Policy Coherence in Multi-Level Governance and Its Influence on the Enforcement of Environmental Protection Laws in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlp.3589Keywords:
Policy Coherence, Multi-Level Governance, Enforcement, Environmental Protection LawsAbstract
Purpose: To aim of the study was to analyze the policy coherence in multi-level governance and its influence on the enforcement of environmental protection laws.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Policy coherence in multi-level governance significantly enhances the enforcement of environmental protection laws by improving coordination, reducing regulatory conflicts, and clarifying enforcement responsibilities across national, regional, and local levels. Jurisdictions with aligned policies record higher compliance rates, more consistent enforcement actions, and better environmental outcomes compared to fragmented governance systems. Conversely, weak policy coherence undermines accountability, leads to uneven enforcement, and limits the effectiveness of environmental protection efforts.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Multi-level governance theory, institutional theory & policy integration theory may be used to anchor future studies on the policy coherence in multi-level governance and its influence on the enforcement of environmental protection laws. Practically, environmental enforcement agencies should strengthen intergovernmental coordination mechanisms. From a policy perspective, governments should adopt integrated environmental policy frameworks.
Downloads
References
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability. World Development, 93, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.010
Awortwi, N., & Helmsing, A. H. J. (2020). Governance, decentralisation and public service delivery. Public Administration and Development, 40(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1884
Bennett, N. J., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance. Conservation Biology, 32(5), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13163
Biber, E. (2019). Law and regulatory policy. Ecology Law Quarterly, 46(3), 593–642. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TX36D9F
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2018). Environmental policy integration. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1424318
Persson, Å. (2020). Environmental policy coherence. Policy Sciences, 53(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09394-4
Scott, W. R. (2019). Institutional theory. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12425
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luciana Barros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
