Influence of the Supply Chain Infrastructure Context on Procurement Policy Implementation among Insurance Companies in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijscm.3993Keywords:
Supply Chain Infrastructure, Procurement Policy Implementation, Institutional Theory, Insurance Companies, KenyaAbstract
Purpose: This study examined the influence of the supply chain infrastructure context on procurement policy implementation among insurance companies in Kenya.
Methodology: The study was grounded theoretically in Institutional Theory and adopted a descriptive cross-sectional survey research design targeting all 52 licensed insurance companies in Kenya as per the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA, 2024) registry, with data collected from Chief Procurement Officers (CPOs), Supply Chain Managers (SCMs), or Operations Managers in each company. The study used a census approach and structured questionnaires with variables measured on a five-point Likert scale. Prior to main data collection, a pilot study involving 10% of the target population validated the research instrument, with Cronbach's Alpha confirming internal consistency. Of the 52 questionnaires administered, 46 were properly completed and returned, representing a response rate of 88.5%. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0, applying descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, including Pearson's correlation, multiple linear regression, and ANOVA. Diagnostic tests, specifically the Variance Inflation Factor for multicollinearity, the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroscedasticity, and the Durbin-Watson statistic for autocorrelation, were conducted before regression analysis and confirmed that the model assumptions were satisfied.
Findings: The regression results showed that the supply chain infrastructure context (β = 0.381, B = 0.275, t = 3.490, p = 0.001) made a positive and statistically significant contribution to procurement policy implementation. Supply chain infrastructure context emerged as the strongest predictor of procurement policy implementation, followed by supplier network structure context, information sharing and integration context, and market dynamics context.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theoretically, the study validates Institutional Theory in explaining how insurance companies adapt procurement policies to regulatory and market pressures, while confirming the need to integrate the Resource-Based View, Technology Acceptance Model, and Transaction Cost Theory to fully account for the infrastructure, network, and information-sharing dimensions of procurement policy implementation. In practice, the study recommends that insurance company management prioritise investment in integrated electronic procurement infrastructure covering the complete procurement cycle, supplier network development, and information-sharing systems. At the policy level, the study recommends that industry regulators and procurement professionals strengthen market risk management guidance to support procurement policy implementation across the sector.
Downloads
References
Ajibola, L. R., Magaji, S., & Musa, I. (2025). Assessing the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks in enhancing stakeholder collaboration for sustainable procurement practices in Nigeria. ISA Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 4(1), 1–18.
Asgari, F., Nazari, A., & Khalili, F. (2024). The effective factors on the equalization of premium rates received in line with the policy of managing financial reserves. Journal of Industry and Development Studies, 12(2), 55–74.
Atiende, M. J., & Ndolo, J. (2025). Transparent procurement practices and performance of medical supply chain in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), 1–18.
Ayeni, T. J., & Adebayo, O. (2023). Legal environment and procurement effectiveness in Nigerian insurance sector. International Public Review Journal, 31(1), 88–102.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 294–303.
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2013). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. ACTS Press.
Muhando, C., Ngala, C., & Machuki, P. (2025). The effect of supply chain integration on the performance of procurement in the county governments of Western Region, Kenya. Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Repository.
Mutangili, S. K. (2025). Public procurement laws under supply chain in Kenya. Journal of Procurement & Supply Chain, 9(1), 1–18.
Odhiambo, W. (2018). Influence of regulatory framework on procurement practices among financial institutions in Kenya. Unpublished master's thesis, Kenyatta University.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40.
Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2024). Digital innovation capabilities and procurement implementation in the insurance industry. Journal of Insurance Issues, 47(1), 55–78.
Tadesse, M., & Fekadu, H. (2023). Funding disbursement and procurement efficiency in Ethiopian health insurance agencies. African Review of Health Policy and Finance, 12(2), 142–159.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Grace Akinyi Otieno , Wycliffe Arani, Mary Andika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.