“A Policy Framework: Integrating Virtual and Augmented Reality into UAE School Curricula”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijts.3520Keywords:
Technological Change and Growth, Innovation, Government Policy, Analysis of Education, Economic Development, Diffusion of VR and AR Technologies, Education and Research InstitutionsAbstract
Purpose: The goal of this study is to identify an actionable policy framework for integrating Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR) into UAE School Curricula. The research investigated existing policy initiatives, identified gaps in policy and infrastructure, and reviewed international best practice examples to create a relevant framework for integration. The research is aligned with the UAE initiatives of embedding AI (i.e. Vision 2031) to produce recommendations for an actionable policy proposal.
Methodology: The study adopted a mixed-method research design, taking into account both quantitative and qualitative data. A survey questionnaire is used to collect the qualitative data from the 50 respondents working in 10 different schools in the UAE. The sample included School Teachers, students, Principal, department head, Curriculum Specialist and Technical Support Specialist. Whereas the qualitative data is collected from the 8 participants, such as EdTech Consultant, school IT Directors, Teachers, Policy Analyst, Curriculum Developer and Principals who are part of these schools, as well as the UAE education ministry. The quantitative data is analysed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 22 and Excel. The findings from the SPSS are presented in the form of tables, whereas the qualitative data are analysed using thematic analysis.
Findings: The survey results showed that integrating VR/AR into UAE school curricula is moderately positive, with a mean score of 3.11 (Std Dev 0.865). Respondents largely recognise VR/AR’s potential to enhance learning experiences (50% strongly agree, 32% agree), boost student engagement (58% strongly agree), and prepare students for future careers (52% strongly agree). Key considerations include addressing infrastructure gaps (mean 2.46), providing critical teacher training (mean 3.42), managing costs (44% agree/44% strongly agree on needing government funding), and ensuring equitable access (concerns with a mean 2.52). Whereas the interview results found that policy frameworks should address factors such as high cost, technical skills, and resistance to change, necessitating policy frameworks, partnerships, and targeted support.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theoretically, the study is informed by Constructivist Theory and Skinner’s Behavioural theory, as the study is seen to examine the factors that influence VR/AR adoption in education in the UAE. Validation was achieved by evaluating the perception of the stakeholders through surveys and interviews, contextualising the two models to the educational context of the UAE. Practically, recommendations include providing targeted teacher professional development on VR/AR pedagogies, developing content aligned to the curriculum, and developing partnerships between schools and technology providers for effective implementation. Practitioners should concentrate on user-centred design in the VR/AR experience and support technical needs. Within policy, recommendations to policymakers include building a national VR/AR integration plan, establishing infrastructure and equity guidelines, creating data privacy and security standards, and cultivating public-private partnerships. Policy efforts should align with the goals of UAE Vision 2031, particularly around its focus on innovation and preparing students for a technology-driven future, and use it as a guide to systematic VR/AR adoption in UAE schools.
Downloads
References
Al Ali, A. I. Z. (2024). Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. https://caa.ae/PORTALGUIDELINES/MBRSG%20-%20IE%20
Al Mohsen, F., & Mohebi, L. (2024). Effectiveness of Field Experience Program in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in the Light of Vision 2030. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 339. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.16
Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analysing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
Alrowaily, M. A. (2022). Augmented reality and behavioural change: a technology acceptance study. https://figshare.mq.edu.au/ndownloader/files/34544447
Doerner, R., & Horst, R. (2022). Overcoming challenges when teaching hands-on courses about Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality: Methods, techniques and best practice. Graphics and Visual Computing, 6, 200037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gvc.2021.200037
Egunjobi, D., & Adeyeye, O. J. (2024). Revolutionising Learning: The Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI on Education. ResearchGate, Oct. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2734
Green, R. (2023). Descriptive statistics. In Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (pp. 41-55). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Hinduja, P. (2021). From behaviourism to constructivism in the teaching-learning process. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 9(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0922109204
Hojeij, Z., Alsuwaidi, S., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Scoping the literature on Professional Development for Educators and Educational Leaders in the UAE. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 9(3), 216-251.
Iqbal, M. Z., Mangina, E., & Campbell, A. G. (2022). Current challenges and future research directions in augmented reality for education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(9), 75. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1480120
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022). Augmented reality and virtual reality in education: Public perspectives, sentiments, attitudes, and discourses. Education Sciences, 12(11), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110798
LaValle, S. M. (2023). Virtual reality. Cambridge University Press.
Liono, R. A., Amanda, N., Pratiwi, A., & Gunawan, A. A. (2021). A systematic literature review: learning with visuals by the help of augmented reality helps students learn better. Procedia Computer Science, 179, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.12.019
Market.us (2024). AR and VR in the education market. Available at: https://market.us/report/augmented-and-virtual-reality-in-education-market/ (Accessed: 23 September 2025).
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023a). Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024b). How personalised and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(6), 18185-18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
Mohamed, T. I., & Sicklinger, A. (2022). An integrated curriculum of virtual/augmented reality for multiple design students. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11137-11159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11069-6
Mustafa, F., Bin Daud, M., Bin Yussuf, A., Kasasbeh, N., & Abu Khurma, O. (2025). The Practice of Augmented Reality in Islamic Education and the Level of Motivation Among UAE Secondary School Students. Social Sciences, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/
Perifanou, M., Economides, A. A., & Nikou, S. A. (2022). Teachers’ views on integrating augmented reality in education: Needs, opportunities, challenges and recommendations. Future Internet, 15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
Rabbani, L. M., Alarabi, K. S., Alsalhi, N. R., & Sa’deh Al Marashdi, H. (2023). Behaviourist vs. Constructivist views of feedback: Provisions and implications. Arts Educa, 36. https://artseduca.com/submissions/index.php/ae/article/view/137
Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual reality, 25(1), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
Schulte, P., & Shemakov, R. (2024). The Future of Digital Infrastructure: Case Studies of Global Corporate Strategies in Augmented Reality. In Global perspectives in the metaverse: Law, economics, and finance (pp. 119-143). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54802-4_7
Shihab, R. S. O. (2022). The Gap Between the Rhetoric and the Reality of Inclusion Policy: The Theoretical Framework and Challenges of Effective Implementation at one Private American School in Dubai-A Case Study (Master’s thesis, The British University in Dubai). https://www.proquest.com/openview/bcbad327d42b2309e6e709c1f02aca7f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., & Akinkuolie, B. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540
Squires, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In Varieties of qualitative research methods: Selected contextual perspectives (pp. 463-468). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63. https://hal.science/hal-03741840v1
Tene, T., Marcatoma Tixi, J. A., Palacios Robalino, M. D. L., Mendoza Salazar, M. J., Vacacela Gomez, C., & Bellucci, S. (2024, June). Integrating immersive technologies with STEM education: a systematic review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1410163). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1410163
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., ... & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Titchiev, I., Caftanatov, O., & Talambuta, D. (2023). Challenges associated with using AR technology in education. Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 93(3), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.56415/csjm.v31.19
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments (pp. 35-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zhang, W., & Wang, Z. (2021). Theory and practice of VR/AR in K-12 science education—a systematic review. Sustainability, 13(22), 12646. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12646
Zhao, X., Ren, Y., & Cheah, K. S. (2023). Leading virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in education: bibliometric and content analysis from the Web of Science (2018–2022). Sage Open, 13(3), 21582440231190821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231190821
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maitha Rashed Al Fandi Al Shamsi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.