Preferences for Print and Electronic Resources and Factors Influencing Resource Choice among Students and Faculty in Kenya Medical Training College Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijts.4032Keywords:
Print Resources, Resource Preference, Kenya Medical Training CollegeAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine students' and faculty members' preferences for print and electronic resources and the factors influencing their resource choices in Kenya Medical Training College (KMTC) libraries.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted among students and faculty in nine selected Kenya Medical Training College (KMTC) campuses. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the study sites, with proportionate sampling employed for students and a census conducted for all available lecturers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to preferred resource formats, preferred online databases, and the factors influencing resource choice. Findings were presented using tables and figures.
Findings: The study concluded that students and faculty at KMTC did not demonstrate an exclusive preference for either print or electronic resources. Instead, resource preference is determined by the nature of the learning task and the perceived advantages of each resource format. While electronic resources are increasingly preferred because of their accessibility, convenience, and flexibility, print resources continue to play an important role in supporting intensive reading and academic learning.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that KMTC should continue investing in both print and electronic library resources to sustain a balanced hybrid library environment that accommodates diverse user preferences.
Downloads
References
Blummer, B., & Kenton, J. M. (2021). Academic and Research Libraries’ Portals: A Literature Review from 2003 to the Present. Research Anthology on Collaboration, Digital Services, and Resource Management for the Sustainability of Libraries, 847–874.
Clark, J. C., Stormes, S., & Sauceda, J. (2018). Format preferences of performing arts students: A multi-institution study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5), 620–626.
Cumaoglu, G., Sacici, E., & Torun, K. (2013). E-book versus printed materials: Preferences of university students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 121–135.
Fisher, A. A., Laing, J. E., Stoeckel, J. E., & Townsend, J. W. (1998). Handbook for family planning operations research design (2nd ed.). Population Council.
Halloumeh, K. A., & Jirjees, J. M. (2016). Electronic versus Print Journals in Academic Libraries in Abu Dhabi: Preference & Problems. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 4(04), 113.
Iqbal, Q., Tariq, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2021). Student’s Challenges in Access to Digital Resources in Higher Education Institutes of Pakistan.
Kenya Medical Training College. (2021). Library monthly report: Makindu Campus. Unpublished internal document. Retrieved from KMTC Makindu Campus Library archives
Pather, R. (2004). A comparative study of the costs and benefits of journal ownership versus full-text electronic access in the Faculty of Science at the University of Natal, Durban, Libraries. [PhD Thesis].
Toor, S. I., Ashfaq, A., & Ilyas, M. (2021). Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore. Global Mass Communication Studies Review, VI (I), 70-78.
Yebowaah, A.F., & Plockey, D.D.F. (2017). Awareness and use of electronic resources in University libraries: A Case Study of University for Development Studies Library. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 James Musovya, Raphael Mutiso, Luciah Jonah, Nicholas Kwinga, Zachary Ombasa, Emma Nthei, Loise Mwangi, Gilbert Nguutu, Redempta Mutisya, Urbanus Mutiso Muthusi, Luciana Kaloki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
