Re-evaluating Corporate Diversity Initiatives: Leveraging Social Identity Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jhrl.3517Keywords:
Diversity, , Social Identity TheoryAbstract
Purpose: Corporate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives have historically aimed to address systemic inequities in the workplace. However, in recent years, these efforts have faced increasing political, legal, and financial challenges, leading many organizations to scale back or reassess their diversity strategies. Critics argue that certain diversity programs, such as mandatory diversity training and affirmative action policies, may unintentionally reinforce stereotypes, generate resistance, and create workplace divisions.
Methodology: This conceptual paper explores how Social Identity Theory can enhance inclusion efforts. By understanding how individuals form social identities and perceive ingroups and outgroups, organizations can implement more effective diversity strategies that foster collaboration rather than division.
Findings: The paper highlights the importance of promoting a superordinate identity that unites employees under shared organizational goals, reducing intergroup tensions.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Organizations can strengthen DEI training by fostering a superordinate identity, leveraging ingroup favoritism for collective success, addressing the double-edged nature of trust, cultivating solidarity through shared experiences, and tailoring communication with scenario-based learning to enhance engagement and inclusion.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading/Addison-Wesley.
Booysen, L. (2007). Barriers to employment equity implementation and retention of blacks in management in South Africa. South African journal of labour relations, 31(1), 47-71.
Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554–594). McGraw-Hill.
Burnett, L., & Aguinis, H. (2024). How to prevent and minimize DEI backfire. Business Horizons, 67(2), 173-182.
Chae, J., Kim, K., Kim, Y., & et al. (2022). Ingroup favoritism overrides fairness when resources are limited. Scientific Reports, 12, 4560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08460-1
Charness, G., & Holder, P. (2019). Charity in the laboratory: Matching, competition, and group identity. Management Science, 65(3), 1398-1407.
Cox, T. (1991). The multicultural organization. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 34–47.
Craig, M. A., Badaan, V., & Brown, R. M. (2020). Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 41-48.
Cruwys, T., Greenaway, K. H., Ferris, L. J., Rathbone, J. A., Saeri, A. K., Williams, E., & Grace, L. (2021). When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 57.
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 14.
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative science quarterly, 46(2), 229-273.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.). (2000). Reducing intergroup bias—The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
Gonzalez, A. (2024, August 31). The corporate retreat from DEI: A short-sighted strategy. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciagonzalez/2024/08/31/the-corporate-retreat-from-dei-a-short-sightedstrategy/
Greenaway, K. H., Wright, R. G., Willingham, J., Reynolds, K. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2014). Shared identity is key to effective communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 171–182.
Gündemir, S., Kanitz, R., Rink, F., Hoever, I. J., & Slepian, M. L. (2024). Beneath the surface: Resistance to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in organizations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 60, 101922.
Harmeling, S. (2023, December 16). I hate to admit Elon Musk raises a fair point on DEI. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanharmeling/2023/12/16/i-hate-to-admit-elon-musk-raises-a-fair-pointon-dei/
Haslam, S. A., Reutas, J., Bentley, S. V., McMillan, B., Lindfield, M., Luong, M., ... & Steffens, N. K. (2023). Developing engaged and ‘teamful’ leaders: A randomized controlled trial of the 5R identity leadership program. PLoS One, 18(5), e0286263.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review. Social and personality psychology compass, 2(1), 204-222.
Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002
Nittrouer, C. L., Arena Jr, D., Silver, E. R., Avery, D. R., & Hebl, M. R. (2025). Despite the haters: The immense promise and progress of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(1), 188-201.
Portocarrero, S., & Carter, J. T. (2022). Diversity initiatives in the US workplace: A brief history, their intended and unintended consequences. Sociology Compass, 16(7), e13001. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13001
Shteynberg, G., & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2013). The power of shared experience: Simultaneous observation with similar others facilitates social learning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 738744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613479807
Spadaro, G., Liu, J. H., Zhang, R. J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Balliet, D. (2024). Identity and institutions as foundations of ingroup favoritism: An investigation across 17 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(5), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231172330
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Schuh, S. C., Jetten, J., & van Dick, R. (2017). A meta-analytic review of social identification and health in organizational contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 303-335.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Tessema, M. T., Hulback, T., Jones, J., Santos-Leslie, R., Ninham, K., Sterbin, A., & Swanson, N.
(2023). Diversity, equity, and inclusion: History, climate, benefits, challenges, and creative strategies. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 11(4), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2023.114044
Unzueta, M. M., & Binning, K. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity?. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(3), 443.
Van Assche, J., Ardaya Velarde, S., Van Hiel, A., & Roets, A. (2023). Trust is in the eye of the beholder: How perceptions of local diversity and segregation shape social cohesion. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1036646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036646
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008.
Weinberg, C. (2023, December 22). Google, Meta, and other tech giants cut DEI programs in 2023. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/22/google-meta-other-tech-giants-cut-dei-programs-in-2023.html
Winkler, R. (2024, February 1). Why companies are scaling back DEI in America. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-02-01/why-companies-are-scaling-back-dei-inamerica
Wrench, J. (2016). Diversity management and discrimination: Immigrants and ethnic minorities in the EU. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ambika Prasad, PhD, Sonya Penanhoat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
