Revitalising University Presses in Kenya through Digital Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ajikm.3011Keywords:
Offset Technology, Computer-To-Print, Technology Acceptance Model, Digital Rights Management, Disruptive TechnologyAbstract
Purpose: This study explores the extent to which university presses in Kenya have adopted digital publishing technologies to enhance competitiveness and sustainability, highlighting the associated merits and demerits.
Methodology: The study employed a convergent mixed-methods approach with a survey research design. Study participants were selected through a census of 43 university press staff drawn from seven university presses in Kenya. Data was collected using questionnaires and interview schedules.
Findings: Study findings reveal that most university presses in Kenya still use traditional publishing technologies, and their publications are in print format. The benefits of using digital technologies include flexibility, cost-effectiveness, multitasking, accessibility, easy sharing of publications and high-quantity production. The study identified initial investment and maintenance costs, stiff competition, changing demand, unskilled personnel, and piracy as the significant challenges faced by university presses in Kenya in digital publishing.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The authors recommend increased funding for university presses, staff training on digital technologies in publishing, use of official copyright notices by publishers, digital watermarks and acquisition of Digital Rights Management (DRM) software to fight online piracy.
Downloads
References
Association of American University Presses. (2019). The value of university presses. Retrieved March 26 2020, from http://www.aaupnet.org/about-aaup/about-university-presses/the value-of-universitypresses
Association of University Presses. (2019). The value of university presses. Retrieved March 28 2020, from https://www.aupresses.org
Awuor, A. S., Kwanya, T., & Nyambok, G. A. (2019). The influence of infobesity on the information seeking behaviour of undergraduate students in Tangaza University College. KLISC Journal of Information Science & Knowledge Management, 1(1), 1-10.
Baitz, I., & On, D. (2020). COVID-19 impacts post-secondary students learning preferences on different mediums with nonfiction textbooks.
Clare, J. (2014). University presses in the digital age: How Pace University Press and other university presses can survive and thrive. Publishing Research Quarterly, 30(2), 195-211.
Cope, B., & Phillips, A. (2014). The future of scholarly publishing: Open access and the economics of digital publishing. African Minds.
CUEA Press. (2019). About- Services offered by CUEA Press. Retrieved May 10 2019, from https://www.cuea.edu
Das, A. K. (2015). Scholarly communication (Vol. 1). UNESCO Publishing.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, pp. 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Egerton University Press. (2014). Retrieved July 10 2019, from http://www.egertonac.keindex.php/eu.press.html.
Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
Henry, C. (2018). Ecosystem of university presses. Princeton University Press. Retrieved March 15 2020 from https://www.blog.press.princeton.edu
Ifeduba, E. C. (2022). Predictors of e-publishing adoption in environments of uncertainty. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(3), 174-189.
Joint Information Systems Committee. (2021). New University Press Toolkit. Retrieved February 14 2024, from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/new-university-press-toolkit
Kellogg, C. (2012). University of Missouri Press to close after 54 years. Los Angeles Times, p. 24.
Kenyatta University Printing Press. (2013). Retrieved July 4 2019 from http://www.ku.ac.ke/dreged/index-.php/ku.printingpress
Khera, R. (2018). The benefits of E-Publishing. Retrieved May 10 2020, from https://wwwmorebusiness.com/benefits-e-publishing.
Kogos, A. (2011). University presses and provision of learning materials for institutions of higher learning: a case study of University of Nairobi Press, Kenya. MPhil Thesis, Moi University. Retrieved July 10 2019 from https://www. mu.ac.ke
Kwanya, T. (2018). Information seeking behaviour in digital library contexts. In Library Science and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1384-1408). IGI Global.
Kwanya, T. (2020). Publishing and perishing? Publishing patterns of information science academics in Kenya. Information Development, 36(1), 515.
Kwanya, T., Stilwell, C., & Underwood, P. (2014). Library 3.0: Intelligent libraries and apomediation. Elsevier.
Luescher, T. M., & Van Schalkwyk, F. (2018). African university presses and the institutional logic of the knowledge commons. Learned Publishing, 31, 288-298.
Mathur, S., & Singh, V. (2014). Print quality comparison of sheet-fed offset and digital printing. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Computer Technology, 4(3/4), 91-93.
McNamee, M. (2019). Keeping an eye on the horizon: Miles McNamee serves up some takeaways from HighWire's digital disruption seminar. Research Information, (103), pp. 34-35.
Miller, R. C., & Tsai, C. J. (2020). Scholarly publishing in the wake of COVID-19. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 108(2), 491-495.
Mokoginda, C. (2018). Advantages of digital publishing. Why should you go digital? Retrieved May 10 2020 from https://www.magloft.com/blogg/advantages-of-digital-publishing
Mudditt, A. (2016). The past, present, and future of American university presses: A view from the left coast. Learned Publishing, p. 29.
Mukhwana, E. J., & Too, J. K. (2017, March). Chapter six invited address policies to support quality university postgraduate research training. In Science Research and Education in Africa: Proceedings of a Conference on Science Advancement (p. 39). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., & Benade, L. (2021). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. In: The methodology and philosophy of collective writing (pp. 337). Routledge.
Poquiz, J. L. (2023). Measuring the Value of Digital Piracy. Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence, (1).
Sherman, S. (2014). University Presses under Fire: How the Internet and Slashed Budgets have Endangered one of Higher Education's Most Important Institutions. The Nation.
Sunderaraj, R., & Mareeswaran, K. (2017). A study on HRM practices of employees in the printing industry in Sivakasi. International Journal of Engineering Science, p. 4271.
Taylor, M., & Jensen, K. S. (2018). Engaging and supporting a university press scholarly community. Publications, 6(2), 13.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186204.
Wafula, M., Musakali, J., & Muliaro, J. (2019). The extent of adoption of e-publishing by university presses in Kenya. Electronic Publishing, (Short Papers).
Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213228.
Watkinson, C. (2021). University Presses and the impact of COVID-19. Retrieved February 15 2024, from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/166290/leap1352am.pdf
Weng’ua, F. N., Rotich, D. C., & Kogos, E. J. (2017). The role of Kenyan universities in promoting research and scholarly publishing. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 83(2), 23-29.
Yusuf, S. O., Musa, M. A., Diugwi, I. A., Adindu, C. C., & Afeez, B. (2022). A Systematic literature review approach on the role of digitalisation in construction infrastructure and sustainable city development in developing countries ZEMCH Network, United Arab Emirates University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Florence Namarome Weng’ua, Tom Kwanya, Ashah Owano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.