Level of Funding and Performance of Monitoring and Evaluation System of Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus Programme in Msambweni Sub- County, Kwale County
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/gjhs.1635Keywords:
Funding, Annual Budgets, Monitoring and Evaluation System, Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus ProgrammeAbstract
Purpose: The study sought to determine influence of funding on performance of Monitoring and Evaluation system of Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus Programme in Msambweni Sub- County, Kwale County
Methodology: A descriptive survey design was used. A total of 36 staff working in the HIV Programme were targeted because they are familiar with the M&E activities of the programme. All thirty-six staff working in the programme were used in this study as respondents. The researcher used Census survey in each facility because the number of subjects was manageable. Data was collected from the respondents using semi- structured questionnaires. The data was sorted, assessed for completeness and edited for errors, coded, and then entered into the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 where it was analysed using descriptive statistics. Descriptive statistics that were used include percentages and frequencies. Data presentation was done using tables, charts and graphs.
Findings: Results revealed that the budget allocated for most of the respondents is minimal and does not favour the monitoring and evaluation system. The study concluded that lack of sufficient budget allocation has a negative impact on the performance of the monitoring and evaluation system.
Unique contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends for more money to be generated in to the budget allocated to favour the monitoring and evaluation system. Lastly but not least the study recommends that training should be encouraged on services delivery to the programme since it have got a very high impact on monitoring and evaluation system.
Downloads
References
Auriacombe, C. (2011). Role of theories of change and programme logic models in policy evaluation. African Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 36-53.
Bao, J., Rodriguez, D. C., Paina, L., Ozawa, S., & Bennett, S. (2015). Monitoring and Evaluating the Transition of Large-Scale Programs in Global Health. Global Health: Science and Practice, 3(4), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00221
Barasa, A., & Kagiri, A. (2018). Factors affecting implementation of result-based monitoring and evaluation in non-profit organizations in Kenya: A case study of habitat for humanity Kenya. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 3(1), 52-72.
Bennett, S., Ozawa, S., Rodriguez, D., Paul, A., Singh, K., & Singh, S. (2015). Monitoring and evaluating transition and sustainability of donor-funded programs: Reflections on the Avahan experience. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.05.003
Boyce, M. R., Attal-Juncqua, A., Lin, J., McKay, S., & Katz, R. (2021). Global Fund contributions to health security in ten countries, 2014-20: Mapping synergies between vertical disease programmes and capacities for preventing, detecting, and responding to public health emergencies. The Lancet Global Health, 9(2), e181-e188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30420-4
Curry, D. W. (2019). Perspectives on Monitoring and Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(1), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018775845
Field, E., Vila, M., Runk, L., Mactaggart, F., Rosewell, A., & Nathan, S. (2018). Lessons for health program monitoring and evaluation in a low resource setting. Rural and Remote Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH4596
Franklin, M., Lomas, J., & Richardson, G. (2020). Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations. PharmacoEconomics, 38(7), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00907-5
Gaibo, G., & Mbugua, J. (2019). Influence of monitoring and evaluation practices on the implementation of county governments' infrastructural development projects in Marsabit County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(5), 184-217.
Gooding, K., Makwinja, R., Nyirenda, D., Vincent, R., & Sambakinsi, R. (2018). Using theories of change to design monitoring and evaluation of community engagement in research: Experiences from a research institute in Malawi. Wellcome Open Research, 3, 8. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13790.1
Guinea, J., Sela, E., Gómez-Núñez, A. J., Mangwende, T., Ambali, A., Ngum, N., Jaramillo, H., Gallego, J. M., Patiño, A., Latorre, C., Srivanichakorn, S., & Thepthien, B. (2015). Impact oriented monitoring: A new methodology for monitoring and evaluation of international public health research projects. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu034
Jain, S., & Zorzi, N. (2017). Investing for Impact: The Global Fund Approach to Measurement of AIDS Response. AIDS and Behavior, 21(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1620-6
Kabonga, I. (2019). Principles and Practice of Monitoring and Evaluation: A Paraphernalia for Effective Development. Africanus: Journal of Development Studies, 48, 21. https://doi.org/10.25159/0304-615X/3086
Kawonga, M., Blaauw, D., & Fonn, S. (2012). Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: A case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10(1), 2.
Maleka, E. N. (2017). Monitoring and evaluation of sport-based HIV/AIDS awareness programmes: Strengthening outcome indicators. SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 14(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2016.1266506
Micah, N. J., & Luketero, S. W. (2017). Monitoring and Evaluation Systems and Performance of Non-Governmental Based Maternal Health Projects in Bungoma South Sub-County, Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(23), 11-11. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p11
Mpofu, M., Semo, B., Grignon, J., Lebelonyane, R., Ludick, S., Matshediso, E., Sento, B., & Ledikwe, J. H. (2014). Strengthening monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and building sustainable health information systems in resource limited countries: Lessons learned from an M&E task-shifting initiative in Botswana. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 1032. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1032
Nabukalu, J., Asamani, J., & Orem, J. (2020). Monitoring sustainable development goals 3: Assessing the readiness of low-and-middle-income countries. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9(7), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.134
Njeru, I., & Luketero, S. (2018). Influence of monitoring and evaluation strategies on performance of medical camp projects in hospitals in Kenya: A case of Embu North Sub-County. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(1).
Opulu, A., & Muchai, S. (2021). Effects of Monitoring and Evaluation on Implementation of Infrastructural Projects Funded by Vihiga County Government, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 11, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.11.04.2021.p11222
Peersman, G., Rugg, D., Erkkola, T., Kiwango, E., & Yang, J. (2009). Are the Investments in National HIV Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Paying Off? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 52 Suppl 2, S87-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181baede7
Pham, M. D., Romero, L., Parnell, B., Anderson, D. A., Crowe, S. M., & Luchters, S. (2017). Feasibility of antiretroviral treatment monitoring in the era of decentralized HIV care: A systematic review. AIDS Research and Therapy, 14(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-017-0131-5
Rabarison, K. M., Bish, C. L., Massoudi, M. S., & Giles, W. H. (2015). Economic Evaluation Enhances Public Health Decision Making. Frontiers in Public Health, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00164
Tulchinsky, T. H., & Varavikova, E. A. (2014). Chapter 11 - Measuring Costs: The Economics of Health. In T. H. Tulchinsky & E. A. Varavikova (Eds.), The New Public Health (Third Edition) (pp. 575-611). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415766-8.00011-2
Vincent, K., & Phiri, M. (2019). WHO SAID MONITORING AND EVALUATION IS NOT ROOTED IN FIRM THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS? A REVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURE.
Warren, A., Cordon, R., Told, M., de Savigny, D., Kickbusch, I., & Tanner, M. (2017). The Global Fund's paradigm of oversight, monitoring, and results in Mozambique. Globalization and Health, 13(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0308-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rachael Mwende Musyoka , Dr. Serah W. Kimaru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.