Procurement Ethics and Corruption: An Examination of Italy and Zimbabwe

Authors

  • Vimbai Mutasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/gjppm.2953

Keywords:

Procurement Ethic, Corruption

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the procurement ethics and corruption: an examination of Italy and Zimbabwe.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: The study on procurement ethics and corruption in Italy and Zimbabwe reveals significant contrasts between the two countries. In Italy, procurement processes are more structured, with stringent regulations aimed at curbing corruption, yet challenges persist, particularly in the enforcement of these regulations. In contrast, Zimbabwe faces more profound issues with systemic corruption deeply embedded in its procurement practices, exacerbated by weaker institutional frameworks and lack of transparency.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Principal-agent theory, institutional theory & ethical decision-making theory may be used to anchor future studies on analyze the procurement ethics and corruption: an examination of Italy and Zimbabwe. Organizations in both Italy and Zimbabwe should implement robust ethical training programs for procurement officials to promote integrity and accountability. Policymakers in Italy and Zimbabwe should collaborate to develop comprehensive anti-corruption frameworks that address the unique challenges faced in each country’s procurement landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AFA. (2021). Annual report on public procurement and corruption in France. Retrieved from https://www.agence-francaise-anticorruption.gouv.fr

ANA0. (2022). Public procurement and corruption in Australia: An overview. Retrieved from https://www.anao.gov.au

Bundesministerium des Innern. (2019). Annual report on public procurement and corruption in Germany. Retrieved from https://www.bmi.bund.de

Chirisa, I., & Nyoni, T. (2020). Leveraging technology for ethical procurement in Zimbabwe: A path to reducing corruption. African Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.25159/1994-7891/6236

Chirisa, I., & Nyoni, T. (2020). Leveraging technology for ethical procurement in Zimbabwe: A path to reducing corruption. African Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.25159/1994-7891/6236

COA. (2020). The state of public procurement in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.coa.gov.ph

Coccia, M., & Wang, J. (2020). The effect of corruption on public procurement efficiency: Evidence from Italy. Public Procurement Law Review, 29(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppl.2020.03.004

Coccia, M., & Wang, J. (2020). The effect of corruption on public procurement efficiency: Evidence from Italy. Public Procurement Law Review, 29(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppl.2020.03.004

EACC. (2021). Ethics and anti-corruption report on public procurement in Kenya. Retrieved from https://www.eacc.go.ke

Franceschini, F., & Galati, A. (2022). Procurement corruption and public trust in Italy: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13350

Ghana Integrity Initiative. (2020). Corruption in public procurement: A report on the state of procurement in Ghana. Retrieved from https://www.gihoc.org

Giannetti, R., Petrucci, F., & Rossi, G. (2019). Anti-corruption measures in public procurement: An evaluation of effectiveness in Italy. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(3), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12203

Kostnadsrevisjon. (2021). Procurement integrity in Norway: A review of practices and challenges. Retrieved from https://www.revisjon.no

Maposa, R., & Mafa, K. (2023). Barriers to ethical procurement in Zimbabwe’s construction industry. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 41(3), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2209325

Moyo, T., & Mabhena, R. (2021). Procurement ethics and service delivery in Zimbabwe: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(4), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2020-0170

National Audit Office. (2020). Investigating the impact of public procurement fraud. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk

NEITI. (2021). The impact of corruption on public procurement in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.neiti.gov.ng

Office of the Auditor General. (2020). Public service integrity and procurement. Retrieved from https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca

Public Service Commission. (2021). Report on public procurement irregularities in South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.psc.gov.za

Riksrevisionen. (2022). Public procurement and transparency in Sweden: An evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.riksrevisionen.se

Tosi, A., & Merlo, A. (2021). Public procurement corruption and its impact on economic growth in Italy: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2021.1973069

Transparency International India. (2020). Corruption in public procurement: A study of perceptions. Retrieved from https://www.transparencyindia.org

Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions in public procurement in India. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl

Transparency International. (2021). Global Corruption Report: Corruption in the public sector. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/gcr

U.S. Department of Justice. (2021). Annual report on public procurement fraud. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/1234567/download

Downloads

Published

2024-09-21

How to Cite

Mutasa, V. (2024). Procurement Ethics and Corruption: An Examination of Italy and Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Purchasing and Procurement Management, 3(3), 40 – 53. https://doi.org/10.47604/gjppm.2953

Issue

Section

Articles