Television Story Angle and the Involvement on Learners with Intellectual Disability in Inclusive Education in Kenya

Authors

  • Jackline U. Lidubwi Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Julius Bosire Technical University, Kenya
  • Dr. Joan Mutua Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.1779

Keywords:

Story Angles, Framing, Inclusive Education, Intellectual Disability

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to examine the influence of television story angle and the involvement on learners with intellectual disability in inclusive education in Kenya. The paper was guided by the framing theory.

Methodology: The study utilized the descriptive cross-sectional research design. A sample of 40 inclusive education schools, 16 Sub-County Education Officers, three television stations, 72 television programmes, three television producers and five key informants from the Kenya Association of the Intellectually Handicapped was drawn. Data was gathered through questionnaires, interview guides and code sheets. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics while thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.

Findings: The study established that while television stations have aired stories about inclusive education, the content aired seemed to portray people with disabilities as objects of pity, curiosity, evil, laughable, and burdensome. These qualities were repugnant to inclusion of learners with disabilities in education and were therefore counterproductive to inclusive education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghan, D. (2007). Media Coverage of Gender and Disability in Kenya: A Situation Analysis. Study Report Submitted to Handicap International.

Auslander G, & Gold N (1999). Disability terminology in the media: a comparison of newspaper reports in Canada and Israel. Soc Sci Med; P48:420-31.

Cohen, A. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (eds). (1993). Framing the Intifada: People and Media. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Elliott, T. R., & Byrd, E. K. (1982). Media and disability. Rehabilitation Literature, 43(11-12), 348-355.

Gamson W, Modigliani A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Social; 95:1-37.

Goffman, E. (1986). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: North Eastern University Press.

Hunt, P. (1991). Discrimination: Disabled people and the media. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-Media.pdf

Jones, S. C., & Harwood, V. (2008). Representations of Autism in Australian print media. Disabil Soc, 24:5-18.

Ndavula, J. O. & Lidubwi, J. U. (2016) Representation of Students with Disability (SWD) in Media: The case of Abled Differently television programme. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, Vol, 16.

UNESCO (2006) EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Paris: UNESCO, p. 74; UNESCO (2011) EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011, Paris: UNESCO, p. 1.

Zalkauskaite, U. (2012). Crystallization of Disability Stereotypes in Lithuanian Media. Socialiniai Mokslai, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 83-91.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-20

How to Cite

Lidubwi, J., Bosire, J., & Mutua, J. (2023). Television Story Angle and the Involvement on Learners with Intellectual Disability in Inclusive Education in Kenya. International Journal of Communication and Public Relation, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.1779

Issue

Section

Articles