Renewable Energy Adoption and Carbon Emission Reductions in Copenhagen, Denmark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcs.2971Keywords:
Renewable Energy Adoption, Carbon Emission ReductionsAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the renewable energy adoption and carbon emission reductions in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Renewable energy adoption in Copenhagen, Denmark, has led to significant reductions in carbon emissions, driven by the city’s commitment to transitioning from fossil fuels to clean energy sources such as wind, solar, and biomass. Studies indicate that the integration of these renewable energy sources into Copenhagen's power grid has contributed to a reduction of approximately 35% in carbon emissions over the past decade. This success is attributed to strong government policies, financial incentives, and technological advancements that have supported the widespread adoption of renewables.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Sustainable livelihoods framework, integrated water resources Management (IWRM) & theory of planned behavior may be used to anchor future studies on renewable energy adoption and carbon emission reductions in Copenhagen, Denmark. In practice, Copenhagen's approach to renewable energy adoption should be further refined and documented as a best practice model for other cities. From a policy perspective, Copenhagen should continue to lead in setting ambitious renewable energy targets, while ensuring that policies are adaptable to technological advancements and market changes.
Downloads
References
Acheampong, A. O., & Dzanku, F. M. (2019). Deforestation, agriculture, and climate change in Ghana: Implications for carbon emissions. Environmental Development, 32, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100450
Agora Energiewende. (2020). The energy transition in Germany: State of affairs and the way forward. Agora Energiewende Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4014688
Austin, K. G., Schwantes, A., Gu, Y., & Kasibhatla, P. S. (2019). What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 024007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db
Christensen, T., & Jensen, L. (2021). Public attitudes towards renewable energy policies in Copenhagen. Energy Policy, 149, 112097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112097
Commonwealth of Australia. (2020). Australia’s emissions projections 2020. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources Report. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3749344
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2020). UK greenhouse gas emissions, provisional figures 2019. BEIS Report. https://doi.org/10.5286/UKERC.EDC.000942
Dinda, S. (2018). The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 931-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.017
Eshetu, Z., Guta, D. D., & Mekonnen, A. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies in Ethiopia: A review. Environmental Science and Policy, 108, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.016
European Environment Agency. (2020). The effectiveness of emission standards in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. EEA Report, (8), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.2800/6753
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2018). Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 903-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.008
Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2019). The socio-technical transitions approach: Exploring the sustainability of economic growth. Nature Energy, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0006-3
Government of Canada. (2019). Canada’s official greenhouse gas inventory. Environment and Climate Change Canada Report. https://doi.org/10.25318/3710000201-eng
International Energy Agency. (2020). Renewable energy subsidies: Driving the transition to clean energy. IEA Annual Report, (6), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1787/45354d8f-en
Jensen, T., & Holst, C. (2020). Life cycle assessment of renewable energy adoption in Copenhagen: Challenges and opportunities. Renewable Energy, 145, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.045
Jensen, T., & Holst, M. (2020). Life cycle assessment of electric public transport in Copenhagen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122906
Kim, J., Lee, M., & Park, S. (2019). South Korea’s carbon emissions and climate change policies: Challenges and future directions. Energy Policy, 133, 110878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110878
Larsen, A., Pedersen, K., & Madsen, H. (2020). Econometric modeling of renewable energy adoption and carbon footprint in Copenhagen. Energy Economics, 86, 104655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104655
Litman, T. (2019). Evaluating public transportation benefits and costs: Best practices guidebook. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814920-0.00004-5
Møller, B., & Lund, H. (2018). Large-scale integration of wind energy in Copenhagen and its impact on carbon emissions. Energy, 165, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.052
Møller, J., & Lund, H. (2018). The impact of large-scale wind energy integration on carbon emissions in Copenhagen. Energy Policy, 123, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.005
Nielsen, P., & Andersen, R. (2019). Economic impacts of renewable energy adoption in Copenhagen: An input-output analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 1403-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.089
Nyangena, W., & Mungai, D. N. (2020). Climate change and agriculture in Kenya: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Policy, 20(4), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1730176
Pedersen, K., Madsen, H., & Christensen, T. (2019). Solar energy initiatives in Copenhagen and their impact on carbon emissions. Energy Reports, 5, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.029
Pedersen, L., Madsen, M., & Christensen, P. (2019). Solar energy initiatives and carbon emission reductions in Copenhagen. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 37(2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.012
Qi, T., Weng, Y., Zhang, X., & McLellan, B. (2020). China’s efforts to mitigate climate change through renewable energy development. Energy Policy, 145, 111774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111774
Sarr, S., Faye, M., & Diagne, M. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change policies in Senegal: An assessment. Climate Policy, 20(8), 978-992. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1798717
SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales). (2019). Mexico’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory 2019. SEMARNAT Report. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.035
World Bank. (2019). State and trends of carbon pricing. World Bank Group Report. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Christensen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
