Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Evidence from India

Authors

  • Rahul Sharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.2443

Keywords:

Trade Openness, Income Inequality Evidence

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the trade openness and income inequality: evidence from India

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings:  Trade openness in India has complex effects on income inequality. While it can foster economic growth and reduce poverty by creating employment opportunities, it also has the potential to exacerbate income disparities. Trade openness may lead to job displacement and income losses for low-skilled workers, widening the gap between rich and poor. Additionally, globalization may favor certain sectors or skill groups over others, concentrating wealth among the elite.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Stolper-samuelson theorem, factor endowment theory & new trade theory may be used to anchor future studies on the trade openness and income inequality: evidence from India. Encourage the diversification of India's export basket to include more value-added products and services. Invest in education and skill development programs to enhance the human capital of the workforce, thereby improving their competitiveness in the global market

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168.

Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press.

Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2020). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua - PNAD Contínua. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/9173-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios-continua-mensal.html?=&t=resultados

Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2020). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua - PNAD Contínua. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/9173-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios-continua-mensal.html?=&t=resultados

Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics. (2020). Household Income, Expenditure, and Consumption Survey 2018/2019. Retrieved from http://www.capmas.gov.eg/Pages/StaticPages.aspx?page_id=5033

Central Statistics Agency. (2020). Statistik Pendapatan dan Pengeluaran Rumah Tangga 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/08/21/323f9269be6b656f7cf65e58/statistik-pendapatan-dan-pengeluaran-rumah-tangga-2019.html

Federal State Statistics Service. (2020). Income of Population and Consumption per Capita in the Russian Federation. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/en/

Hausmann, R., & Fernandez-Arias, E. (2000). Foreign direct investment: Good cholesterol? Inter-American Development Bank.

Helpman, E. (2006). Trade, FDI, and the organization of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 589-630.

Milanovic, B. (2003). The two faces of globalization: Against globalization as we know it. World Development, 31(4), 667-683.

National Institute of Statistics and Geography. (2018). Medición de la Pobreza. Retrieved from https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/mnap/2018/

National Institute of Statistics. (2015). National Survey on Households' Budgets. Retrieved from http://www.ins.nat.tn/fr/publications/Enqu%C3%AAtes_et_documents_de_travail/ES-EP-2015.pdf

Office for National Statistics. (2021). Effects of taxes and benefits on UK household income: financial year ending 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/theeffectsoftaxesandbenefitsonhouseholdincome/financialyearending2020

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018). Highlights of the Philippine Poverty Statistics: First Semester of 2018. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases

Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Institute for International Economics.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2019). Household Income and Expenditures Survey. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

Statistics South Africa. (2020). Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 2: 2020. Retrieved from http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/P02112ndQuarter2020.pdf

Subramanian, A., & Wei, S. J. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 151-175.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-270.html

Downloads

Published

2024-04-02

How to Cite

Sharma, R. . (2024). Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Evidence from India. International Journal of Economics, 9(1), 42 – 53. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.2443