Firm-Level Determinants of Export Performance in Kenya’s Manufacturing Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.2529Keywords:
Export Propensity, Export Intensity, Self-Selection Hypothesis, Total Factor Productivity, Manufacturing SectorAbstract
Purpose: This study aimed at investigating the firm-level determinants of export performance (export propensity and export intensity) in Kenya’s manufacturing sector using firm-level panel data obtained from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys for the periods 2007, 2013 and 2018.
Methodology: The study adopted a quantitative non-experimental research design. The Heckman Two-Stage estimation procedure was employed to jointly establish the firm-level determinants of export propensity and export intensity in Kenya’s manufacturing sector.
Findings: Based on the estimation results, firm-level total factor productivity, firm size, human capital, cost of material, electricity cost and foreign ownership had positive and significant effects on firms’ export propensity while labor productivity negatively influenced export propensity. Firm age, capital intensity and research did not have significant effects on export propensity. On the other hand, export intensity was positively influenced by firm-level total factor productivity, foreign ownership, firm size, firm age, human capital and research. Labor productivity had a negative effect on firms’ export intensity. Whereas the effect of energy cost on export intensity was weakly significant at 10 percent level of significance, there was no significant effect of cost of material on export intensity.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Employing the new ‘new’ trade theory, the study tested the self-selection hypothesis by analyzing the determinants of export propensity and intensity. According to the self-selection hypothesis, one of the key positive determinants of export propensity and export intensity is firm-level total factor productivity. The study findings validated the self-selection hypothesis since the results revealed firm-level total factor productivity as a positive and significant determinant of both export propensity and export intensity for Kenya’s manufacturing firms. According to the study's conclusions, the government and enterprises must focus on policies that increase firm-level total factor productivity, firm size, human capital, and research in order to improve firms' export performance.
Downloads
References
Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics, 150, 241-275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0
Benfratello, L., Bottasso, A., & Piccardo, C. (2022). 'R&D and export performance: exploring heterogeneity along the export intensity distribution. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 49(2), 189-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00209-1
Bernard , A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of international economics, 47(1), 1-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(98)00027-0
Bernard, A. B., & Wagner, J. (2001). Export entry and exit by German firms. Review of World Economics, 137(1), 105-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02707602
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., & Lawrence, R. Z. (1995). Exporters, jobs and wages in US manufacturing. Brookings papers on economic activity, 67-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2534772
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(3), 105-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.3.105
Bigsten, A., & Gebreeyesus, M. (2009). Firm productivity and exports: Evidence from Ethiopian manufacturing. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1594-1614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902953058
Bresnaham, L., Coxhead, I., Foltz, J., & Mogues, T. (2016). Does freer trade really lead to productivity growth? Evidence from Africa. World Development, 1-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.007
Cameron , A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge university press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811241
Camino-Mogro, S., Ordeñana-Rodríguez, X., & Vera-Gilces, P. (2023). Learning-by-exporting vs. self-selection in Ecuadorian manufacturing firms: Evidence from different industry classifications. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2094451
Charles , S. W., & Richard, L. S. (2020). Applied International Economics. New York: Routledge.
Chebor, T. K. (2020). Export Intensity and Manufacturing Firm Characteristics in Kenya. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nairobi.
Dong, G., Kokko, A., & Zhou, H. (2022). Innovation and Export Performance of Emerging Market Enterprises. International Business Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102025
Esaku, S. (2020). Trade liberalization and productivity growth: A firm-level analysis from Kenya. Review of Economic Analysis. doi:https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v12i4.1791
Faria, S., Rebelo, J., & Gouveia, S. (2020). Firms’ export performance: a fractional econometric approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(2), 521-542. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11934
Feng, L. L., & Swenson, D. L. (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of International Economics, 101, 86-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004
Fonchamnyo, D. C. (2014). (2014). Determinants of export propensity and intensity of manufacturing firms in Cameroon: an empirical assessment. Applied Economics and Finance, 1(2), 30-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v1i2.413
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (Seventh international ed. ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Guner, B., Lee, J., & Lucius, H. W. (2010). The impact of industry characteristics on export performance: a three country study. International Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives, 5(2), 126-142.
Haidar, J. I. (2012). Trade and productivity: Self-selection or learning-by-exporting in India. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1766-1773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.005
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
Jakšić, S., Erjavec, N., & Cota, B. (2019). The role of foreign direct investment and labor productivity in explaining Croatian regional export dynamics. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 3(27), 835-849. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0583-2
KAM. (2018). Manufacturing in Kenya Under the ‘Big 4 Agenda’: A Sector Deep-dive Report. Nairobi.: KAM.
KAM. (2019). Closing the manufacturing gap through the Big 4 Agenda for shared prosperity. Nairobi: KAM.
KAM. (2021). From surviving COVID-19 to thriving: Manufacturing sector rebound for sustained job and investment growth. Nairobi: KAM.
KAM. (2022). Manufacturing manifesto 2022-2027. Nairobi: KAM.
Kasahara, H., & Lapham, B. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of international Economics, 89(2), 297-316.
KCCB. (2021). Tackling Youth Unemployment through revamping the manufacturing Sector in Kenya: Post COVID. Nairobi: KCCB. Retrieved from http://www.cjpc.kccb.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/REPORT-ON-ADDRESSING-YOUTH-UNEMPLOYMENT-THROUGH-MANUFACTURING.doc
Kiendrebeogo, Y. (2020). Learning by exporting or self-selection into exporting? Middle East Development Journal, 12(2), 304-325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2020.1756105
Krammer, S. M., Strange, R., & Lashitew, A. (2018). The export performance of emerging economy firms: The influence of firm capabilities and institutional environments. International Business Review, 27(1), 218-230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.07.003
Krugman, P. (1979). A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of political economy, 87(2), 253-266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/260755
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied Linear Regression Models ( 4th ed. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
López Rodríguez, J., & Serrano Orellana, B. (2020). Human capital and export performance in the Spanish manufacturing firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 1(15), 99-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-04-2019-0143
Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on aggregate industry productivity and intra-industry reallocations. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
Mubarik, M. S., Devadason, E. S., & Govindaraju, C. (2020). Human capital and export performance of small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 5(47), 643-662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-03-2019-0198
Mulliqi, A., Adnett, N., & Hisarciklilar, M. (2019). Human capital and exports: A micro-level analysis of transition countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 7(28), 775-800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1603319
Okado, A. D. (2013). Export propensity and intensity of Kenyan manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking (JEIEFB), 2(2), 638-654.
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of applied econometrics, 11(6), 619-632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199611)11:6%3C619::aid-jae418%3E3.0.co;2-1
Pham, T. T. (2015). Does exporting spur firm productivity? Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 84-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/ae32-1e
Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least Squares Regression Analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 31(2), 350–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x
Reis , J., & Forte, R. (2016). . The impact of industry characteristics on firms’ export intensity. International Area Studies Review, 19(3), 266-281.
Reis, J., & Forte, R. (2016). The impact of industry characteristics on firms’ export intensity. International Area Studies Review, 3(19), 266-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865916646560
Republic of Kenya. (2007). Kenya Vision 2030: A Competitive and Prosperous Kenya. Nairobi: Government printer.
Republic of Kenya. (2012). National Industrialization Policy Framework for Kenya: 2012-2030. Sessional Paper No. 9 of 2012. Nairobi: Government Printer. Retrieved from http://www.industrialization.go.ke/images/downloads/policies/the-national-industrialization-policy.pdf
Republic of Kenya. (2017). The National Export Development and Promotion Strategy for Kenya: 2017-2022. Nairobi: Government Publisher. Retrieved from https://www.trade.go.ke/sites/default/files/NEDPS_Integrated_Strategy_1.pdf
Rialp-Criado, A., & Komochkova, K. (2017). Innovation strategy and export intensity of Chinese SMEs: The moderating role of the home-country business environment. Asian Business & Management, 16, 158-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-017-0018-2
Roberts, M. J., & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The decision to export in Columbia: an empirical model of entry with sunk costs. American Economic Review, 87, 545-564.
Schwiebert, J. (2018). A sample selection model for fractional response variables. Working Paper Series in Economics(No. 382 ).
Vu, H. V., Holmes, M., Tran, T. Q., & Lim, S. (2016). Firm Exporting and Productivity: What If Productivity Is No Longer a Black Box. Baltic Journal of Economics, 16(2), 95–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2016.1187382
Wagner, J. (2001). A note on the firm size–export relationship. Small business economics(17), 229-237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012202405889
World Bank. (2021). World development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dorothy Ngina Kimolo , Dr. Jennifer Njaramba, Dr. Laban Chesang’
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
