Factors Affecting Utilization of Evaluations in Selected Non-Profit Organizations in Kenya

Authors

  • paul Saitoti Letoya Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Jane Omwenga Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Keywords:

knowledge, attitude, dissemination practices, evaluation policy, affect utilization of evaluation recommendations, Non-Profit Organizations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this researchwasto establish what factors affect utilization of evaluationrecommendations among Non-government organizations.

Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive,cross-sectional research designwith a quantitativeapproach.A sample size of 48 CRS (63%) and partner organizations' (37%) staff was calculated based on Slovin's sampling formula at a confidence level of 95% from a sample frame of 60. Multi-stage sampling  technique was used with probability proportional to size (PPS) for the first stage,that distributedthe sample between CRS and partner,and systematic random sampling for the second stage that selected individual respondents.An online semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data before the data was exported onto Statistical Package for Social Sciences software where both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was done.Use of technology was informed by the limitation of physical availability of respondents due to them being stationed in remote areas as well as frequent work travel for those based in Nairobi.Descriptive analysis providedcharacteristicsof respondents and responses while Inferential statistics was used to identify relationships among independent variables and between independent variables and dependent variables

Results: Findings from the study showed that there was a negatively significant correlation between knowledge and use of evaluation.Evaluation policy and attitude were found to be significantly and positivelycorrelated with use of evaluation while disseminationpracticewas not correlated with use of evaluations.

Unique contribution to theory, practice, and policy: This concluded that knowledge,attitude, and policy affected utilization of evaluations but dissemination practice did not.The study recommended strengthening and enforcement of evaluation policy,review of the content and facilitation of dissemination forums as well continued sensitization on theimportance and how to implement evaluation recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

paul Saitoti Letoya, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Post graduate student

Dr. Jane Omwenga, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

References

Adano, U. (2008). Building the Bridge from Human Resources Data to Effective Decisions: Ten Pillars of Successful Data-Driven Decision-Making. CapacityProject Knowledge Sharing.

Højlund, S. (2014). Evaluation use in evaluation systems - the case of the European Commission. Sage, 1.

Hughes, L., Leviton, C., & Edward, F. (2014). Research On the Utilization of Evaluations:A Review and Synthesis. Sage.

Hughes, L., Leviton, C., & Edward, F. (2014). Research On the Utilization of Evaluations:A Review and Synthesis. Sage.

Johnson, K., Greenseid, L. O., Toal, S. A., King, J. A., Lawrenz, F., & Volkov, B. (2009). A Review of the Empirical Literature From 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluations, 377-410.

Miller , (., Strath, S., Swartz, A., & Cashin, S. (2010). Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults. Journal of aging and physical activity, 70-158.

Mugenda, A. G., & Mugenda, O. M. (2003). Research Methods ,Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS).

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2006). Research Methods:Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: African Press for Technology Studies (ACTS).

Preskill, H., & Caracellin, V. (1997). Advances in Mixed Method Evaluation:The challenges and Benefits of integrating Diverse Paradigms. New York: Cornell University.

Rahman, S.-u. (1998). Theory of constraints. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18 ,Iss 4 pp. 336 - 355.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Willey Imprint.

Scott, C. (2005). Measuring Up to the Measurement Problem:The role of statistics in evidencebased. London: London School of Economics.

Shrianjani , M. G., Elle, S., & Alwis, D. (2002). Information as a tool for management decision making: a case study of Singapore. Information Research, 7(1).

Stewart, R. (2015). A theory of change for capacity building for the use of research evidence by decision makers in southern Africa. Johannesburg: Policy Press.

Valovirta, V. (2002). Evaluation Utilization as Argumentation. Sage, 60.

Victoria J. Mabin, S. J. (2003). The performance of the theory of constraints methodology: Analysis and discussion of successful TOC applications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 Iss: 6, pp.568 - 595.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-08

How to Cite

Letoya, paul S., & Omwenga, D. J. (2016). Factors Affecting Utilization of Evaluations in Selected Non-Profit Organizations in Kenya. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, 1(2), 82–97. Retrieved from https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJEPM/article/view/108

Issue

Section

Articles