Dynamics and Issues in Land Administration Systems in South South Cities, Nigeria

Authors

  • Mbee Daniel Mbee University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Tonte Davies Joseph University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijes.1729

Keywords:

Land, Systems, Administration, Urban, Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose: The land administration system in Nigeria has undergone changes over the years. The quest for a sustainable land administration system is borne out of the interest associated with land ownership. This study investigates the dynamics and issues that affect the land administration system in the south-south geopolitical zone, of Nigeria.

Methodology: A survey research method was used in the study. Registered practicing planners constituted the study population and the data for the study were gathered using a questionnaire and secondary data. There were 522 registered practicing town, planners, in the south-south geo-political region at the time of this study and the researchers adopted a census of all the planners as participants in the study. However, only 414 of the censused population correctly filled out and returned copies of the questionnaire. Both qualitative and quantitative tools were used in analyzing the data.

Findings: This study demonstrates that political interference, cultural practice, institutional frameworks, finance, existing laws, data quality, manpower and adoption of standards threaten the land administration system in south south geopolitical zone, of Nigeria. However, the financial constraint has the highest mean score of 3.40 and ranks first among the various challenges while data quality scored 2.97 and ranked 7th position among the several issues confronting the land administration system. As revealed by the study, institutional framework and existing laws in the land both ranked 6th position with a mean score of 3.18. The study empirically showed that there is no significant difference in the challenges of land administration systems in by states since the p-value (0.372) is greater than the critical level of alpha (0.05).

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: To enhance the smooth administration of land in Nigeria, the study recommended that government should adequately fund the agencies that are statutorily saddled with the responsibility of designing land administration systems to guarantee interest in land and promote urban development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abolade, A; Dugeri, T. & Adama, J.U., (2018). Challenges of Digitalizing Land Administration System in Nigeria, AfRES afres2018, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).

Adeniyi, P. 2013. "Improving land sector governance in Nigeria-Implementation of the land governance assessment framework". Synthesis Report, Lagos, Nigeria. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLGA/Resources/LGAF_Nigeria_Final_Report-November 2011.pdf .

Adjekophori, B., Ojeh,; Paul, P.; Anyanwu, M.; & Mustapha 4, (2020). Evaluating the processes and constraints of land administration system in Delta State Nigeria International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management Vol.8, No.2, pp.18-30.

African Union, African Development Bank and Economic Commission for Africa (2014). Guiding Principles on Large-Scale Land-Based Investments in Africa. Addis Ababa.

Barlowe, R. (1978). Land resource economics- The economics of real estate. Eaglewoods Cliff, New Jersey 07632

Bruce, J. W. & Migot-Adholla, S. (eds.), (1993). Searching for land tenure security in Africa. Kendall Press.

Dada, F. (2003). Maps as instruments of land administration in Nigeria. Vantage Press.

Dale, P. F. & McLaughlin J. D. (1998). Land information management. Oxford University Press.

Dale, P. F. (1991). Land information system. In Manguire, D. J., Goodchild, M. F., Rhind, D. W. (eds). Geographic information systems: Principle and applications. Longman Publishers, 2 (8599).

Dale, P.F., and J.D. McLaughlin. 1999. Land Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawidowicz, A. & Zrobeck, R. (2017). Land administration system for sustainable development A Case Study of Poland, Real Estate Management and valuation, 25(1) 112-122

Enemark, S. 2009. "Land Administration System, managing rights, restrictions and responsible in land." Map World Forum, Hyderabad, India, February 10-13, 2009. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.483.9398&rep=rep1&type=pdf

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2007. "Good governance in Land tenure and Administration". FAO Land Tenure Studies No.9. Rome: FAO.

Food and Agricultural Organization FAO. (2007). Land Cover Classification System. Free Press.

Gandhi, P.S. (2016). Land Administration and Its Impact on Economic Development. A PhD Thesis, University of Reading.

Ghebru, H. & Okumo A., (2016) Land Administration Service Delivery and Its Challenges in Nigeria A case study of eight states, working paper 39, International Food Policy Research Institute, Abuja

Hesse, W. J. & Williamson, I. P. (1990). A review of digital cadastral databases in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Surveyor 35, 351-367.

Knox, P. & Steven, P. (2010). Urban social geography- An introduction. Pearson Education Press.

Larsson, G. (1991). Land registration and cadastral systems. Longman Publishers.

Munro-Faure, P. (1999). Valuation and land market issues in tenure reform and land restitution. Sun City.

Mutakyamilwa, F. (2002). Country case study Tanzania, World Bank seminar.

Niklasz, L. Podolcsà k, Ã., Baldwin, R. A., Remetey-Füllöpp, G. (1996). Land administration guidelines with special reference to countries in transition. The Hungrarian Experience, 77-87.

Ogedengbe, P.S. (2016). Exploring the opportunities in efficient land use administration and management for internal revenue generation. Proceedings of the Edo 2016 MCPD

Payne, G. (2012). Holding on: security of tenure-types, policies, practices and challenges. London: ITDG Publishing

Polley, I & Williamson, I. P. (1999). Facilitating digital data transactions using an on-line tool. Geomatica Press, 53, 4, 415- 425.

Rajabifard, A., Chan, T. O. & Williamson, I. P. (1999). The nature of regional spatial data infrastructures. paper presented at AURISA 99.

Richard, T. L. & Frederic, S. (Ed.). (1996). The city reader. Routledge Publishers

Ting, L. & Williamson, I. P. (1999). Cadastral trends- A Synthesis. The Australian Surveyor, 44, 1, 46-54.

Ting, L. & Williamson, I. P. (1999). Land administration and cadastral trends: the impact of the changing humankind-land relationship and global drivers. Proceedings of the joint United Nations and FIG International Conference on land tenure and Cadasrtral infrastructures for sustainable development, Melbourne Publishers. 24-27 October, 1999, 252-275.http://www.geom.unimelb.edu.au/UNConf99/

UN-ECE WPLA (2001). Land administration reviews- Note prepared by Mr. P. Creuzer (Germany) in cooperation with the secretariat.

UN-FIG (1996). Bogor declaration on cadastral Reform. Report from United Nations Interregional Meeting of Experts on the Cadastre.

United Nations (2019). Framework for Effective Land Administration. Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN GGIM) Expert Group on Land Administration and Management.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1996). Land administration guidelines. Meeting of officials on land administration.

United Nations/FIG (1996). Bogor declaration on cadastral reform. http://www.sli.unimelb.au/fig7/

United Nations-FIG (1999). The Bathurst declaration on land administration for sustainable development. Report from the UN-FIG workshop on "Land Tenure and Cadastral Infrastructures for Sustainable Development," NSW, Australia, 18-22 October.

Wessely, R., (2002). Do we need to make society more aware of the benefits of the land administration system, UN/ECE Vienna.

Williamson, I. (2007). Global Challenges for Land Administration and Sustainable Development. Conference Proceedings on "Toward a 2015 Vision of Land - A Celebration of ICLPST's 100 Regular Sessions," held at the International Center for Land Policy Studies and Training, Taiwan.

Williamson, I. P. (1997). The justification of cadastral systems in developing Countries. Geometica

Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A. & Feeny, E. M. (2004). Developing spatial data Infrastructures.

World Bank (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank research report.

Zimmermann, W. (2001). FIG Co-operation with UN organisations and other international Agencies-The approach of the German agency for technical co-operation GTZ. Proceedings to new technology for a New century", technical conference during the FIG Working Week, 8-10 May Seol, Korea.

Zoomers, A. (2000). Current land policy in Latin America. KIT Amsterdam NL.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-02

How to Cite

Mbee , M., & Joseph, T. (2023). Dynamics and Issues in Land Administration Systems in South South Cities, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijes.1729