The Effect of Gender Differences on Foreign Language Learning

Authors

  • Philemon N. Okio University of Nairobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijl.1872

Keywords:

Gender Differences, Learning Foreign Languages, Academic Abilities, Male, Female Learners, Academic Achievement

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate
the effect of gender differences on foreign language
learning.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop
methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data
or that which can be collected without fieldwork.
Desk research is basically involved in collecting data
from existing resources hence it is often considered a
low cost technique as compared to field research, as
the main cost is involved in executive's time,
telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study
relied on already published studies, reports and
statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed
through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a
contextual and methodological gap relating to the
effect of gender differences on foreign language
learning. Preliminary empirical review revealed that
motivation is the overriding factor to consider while
interpreting study results. The differences in
motivation among males and females of various
ability levels and the differential effect of the
motivation on individuals belonging to these
gender groups are important to decide the kinds
of activities that would most benefit all learners.
Ability and gender are students "˜variables that have
not been widely investigated in foreign language
studying and less taken together
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and
Policy: The Social Constructivist theory,
Socialization theory and the Interactionist theory may
be used to anchor future studies relating to the effect
of gender differences on foreign language learning.
There is need to investigate variables such as ability
and gender into the establishment of policy
frameworks that enable both genders in the foreign
language learning process.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Philemon N. Okio, University of Nairobi

 

 

References

Alhumsi, M. H., Alshaye, R. A., & Sendi, K. K. (2021). The Effect of E-Learning Sessions on

the Development of Reading Comprehension: A Case of EFL Students' Perceptions at

Saudi Electronic University. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(4), 431-

Alunga, J. U., & Jaluo, W. M. (2013). Gender roles and agribusiness in the Kenyan

communities: The case of Likuyani District. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational

Research and Policy Studies, 4(5), 733-738.

Carli, L. L., & Bukatko, D. (2012). Gender, communication, and social influence: A

developmental perspective. In The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 309-

. Psychology Press.

Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective.

Emotion Review, 7(1), 14-21.

Drew, D. E. (2015). STEM the tide: Reforming science, technology, engineering, and math

education in America. JHU Press.

Eliot, L. (2013). Single-sex education and the brain. Sex roles, 69, 363-381.

Ely, R., & Gleason, J. B. (2017). Socialization across contexts. The handbook of child language,

-276.

Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Prez Pereira, M., Wehberg, S., ... &

Gallego, C. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills:

Evidence from 10 language communities. British journal of developmental psychology,

(2), 326-343.

Everitt, J., Best, L. A., & Gaudet, D. (2016). Candidate gender, behavioral style, and willingness

to vote: Support for female candidates depends on conformity to gender norms. American

Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1737-1755.

Gleason, T. R., Theran, S. A., & Newberg, E. M. (2017). Parasocial interactions and

relationships in early adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 255.

Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary

learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70-88.

Hutchison, A. C., Woodward, L., & Colwell, J. (2016). What are preadolescent readers doing

online? An examination of upper elementary students' reading, writing, and

communication in digital spaces. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 435-454.

Iwaniec, J. (2019). Language learning motivation and gender: The case of Poland. International

Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 130-143.

Jiang, Y. (2012). Cyber-Nationalism in China. Challenging Western media portrayals of internet

censorship in China (p. 156). University of Adelaide Press.

Jungert, T., Alm, F., & Thornberg, R. (2014). Motives for becoming a teacher and their relations

to academic engagement and dropout among student teachers. Journal of Education for

Teaching, 40(2), 173-185.

KayaoÄŸlu, M. N. (2012). Gender-based differences in language learning strategies of science

students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2), 12-24.

l Fagot, B., Rodgers, C., & Leinbach, M. D. (2012). Theories of gender socialization. In The

developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 79-104). Psychology Press.

Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support

second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277-290.

Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2014). (S) econd (L) anguage (A) ctivity theory: Understanding

second language learners as people. In Learner contributions to language learning (pp.

-158). Routledge.

Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational

achievement. American sociological review, 77(3), 463-485.

Leonhardt, M., & Overå, S. (2021). Are there differences in video gaming and use of social

media among boys and girls?"”A mixed methods approach. International journal of

environmental research and public health, 18(11), 6085.

Moazen, M., Kafipour, R., & Soori, A. (2016). Iranian EFL Learners' Perception of the use of

Communication Strategies and Gender Effect. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences &

Humanities, 24(3).

Ping, H. A., & Luan, N. L. (2017). Effects of Learners "˜language Proficiency on their Language

Learning Strategies. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL), 6(1), 10-

Rahman, Q., & Anchassi, T. (2012). Men appear more lateralized when noticing emotion in male

faces. Emotion, 12(1), 174.

Sankarakumar, S., Chandrakanthi, S., & Malathy, P. (2012). The Performance of Male and

Female Students of First Year Engineering in Reading Comprehension Tests. Language

in India, 12(5).

Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Trendtel, M. (2015). The school age gender gap in reading

achievement: Examining the influences of item format and intrinsic reading motivation.

Reading Research Quarterly, 50(2), 219-232.

Shi, X., & Langman, J. (2012). Gender, language, identity, and intercultural communication. In

The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 181-194).

Routledge.

Takeda, S., & Homberg, F. (2014). The effects of gender on group work process and

achievement: an analysis through self"and peer"assessment. British Educational

Research Journal, 40(2), 373-396.

Viriya, C., & Sapsirin, S. (2014). Gender differences in language learning style and language

learning strategies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 77-88.

Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and

mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future

directions. Educational psychology review, 29, 119-140.

Zoghi, Masoud, Seyyed Ali Kazemi, and Ali Kalani. "The effect of gender on language

learning." Journal of Novel Applied Sciences 2.4 (2013): 1124-1128.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-27

How to Cite

Okio, P. . (2023). The Effect of Gender Differences on Foreign Language Learning. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijl.1872

Issue

Section

Articles