Implications of Climate Change Litigation for Environmental Law and Policy in Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlp.2644Keywords:
Implications, Climate Change Litigation, Environmental Law, PolicyAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine implications of climate change litigation for environmental law and policy in Ghana
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study found that the implications of climate change litigation for environmental law and policy in Ghana underscore the urgent need for robust legal frameworks and adaptive policy responses to address the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. While Ghana has made strides in enacting environmental legislation and participating in international climate agreements, the increasing frequency and severity of climate-related impacts necessitate greater legal clarity, enforcement mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement to enhance climate resilience and adaptation efforts. Climate change litigation provides a crucial avenue for affected communities, civil society organizations, and environmental advocates to hold governments and corporations accountable for their contributions to climate change and their obligations to protect the environment and uphold human rights.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Legal Mobilization Theory, Policy Diffusion Theory & Ecological Modernization Theory may be used to anchor future studies on implications of climate change litigation for environmental law and policy in Ghana. Encourage strategic litigation that targets key actors, industries, and policy arenas to maximize the impact of legal interventions on environmental protection and climate action. This involves identifying leverage points within existing legal frameworks and leveraging innovative legal strategies, such as public trust doctrines and rights-based approaches, to advance environmental objectives. Foster greater integration of climate change litigation outcomes into national and international environmental policy-making processes. Governments and intergovernmental organizations should proactively incorporate legal precedents, court decisions, and settlement agreements into policy development, implementation, and evaluation.
Downloads
References
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.
Brazil. (2010). Lei nº 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010.
Brazil. (2012). Lei nº 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012.
Central Pollution Control Board. (2020). National Water Quality Inventory.
Chen, L., & Johnson, M. (2018). Judicial Activism and Climate Change Litigation: A Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 401-420.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2020). National Air Pollutant Emissions Trends.
Federal Environment Agency, Germany. (2021). National Emission Ceilings and Air Quality.
Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2007). National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) Act.
Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE. (2021). Renewable Energy Sources in Germany.
Garcia, A., & Lee, S. (2016). Legal Strategies for Climate Change Litigation: A Case Study Analysis. Georgetown Environmental Law Review, 28(1), 89-112.
Gardner, T., & Telesetsky, A. (2017). Climate Change Litigation as a Catalyst for Action. In D. A. Farber & M. C. Mazaroff (Eds.), Climate Change Law (Vol. I, pp. 141-164). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gardner, T., & Telesetsky, A. (2017). Climate Change Litigation as a Catalyst for Action. In D. A. Farber & M. C. Mazaroff (Eds.), Climate Change Law (Vol. I, pp. 141-164). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Glicksman, R. L. (2019). Climate Change Litigation and the Public Trust Doctrine: Another Approach to Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environmental Law, 49(2), 415-444.
Glicksman, R. L. (2019). Climate Change Litigation and the Public Trust Doctrine: Another Approach to Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environmental Law, 49(2), 415-444.
Glicksman, R. L., & Finkel, A. M. (2020). Climate Change and Environmental Law: An Introduction. Environmental Law, 50(1), 1-31.
Government of Ghana. (1994). Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1994 (Act 490).
Government of Ghana. (2014). National Climate Change Policy.
Johnson, R., & Smith, E. (2019). Public Perception of Climate Change Litigation: A Survey Study. Environmental Politics, 28(4), 623-640.
Kenya Forest Service. (2021). Kenya Forest Cover.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Little, Brown and Company.
Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2017). Climate Change Litigation and Policy Innovation: A Longitudinal Analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 72, 1-12.
Martinez, D., & Patel, N. (2017). The Role of Climate Change Litigation in Advancing Environmental Justice. Ecology Law Quarterly, 44(2), 315-336.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge University Press.
Mexico. (2018). Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente.
Ministry of the Environment, Japan. (2020). Environment White Paper 2020.
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological Modernization Theory in Debate: A Review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49.
Osofsky, H. M., & Biber, E. (2011). The Consequences of Consequential Damages: Public Trust Liability for Climate Change-Induced Harm. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 30(1), 111-166.
Osofsky, H. M., & Biber, E. (2011). The Consequences of Consequential Damages: Public Trust Liability for Climate Change-Induced Harm. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 30(1), 111-166.
Preston, B. L. (2019). The Role of Litigation in Climate Change Policy. In E. Kennedy, B. Croke, M. Donnelly, & J. A. Skinner (Eds.), Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations (pp. 417-429). Springer.
SecretarÃa de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2020). Estrategia Nacional de Cambio Climático 2020-2030.
Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Climate Change Litigation on Environmental Policy. Environmental Law Review, 19(2), 213-230.
South African National Biodiversity Institute. (2021). Protected Area Expansion.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). UNEP in Nigeria.
Zhang, Q., & Park, J. (2019). The Role of International Courts in Climate Change Litigation: A Comparative Assessment. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 28(2), 241-260.
Zhang, Y., Ding, D., & Xie, Y. (2017). Evaluating the impacts of the Clean Air Act Amendments on long-term trends of surface ozone concentrations in the United States. Atmospheric Environment, 156, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.008
Zheng, X., Zhang, Q., He, K., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Fine particle pollution: A global assessment of human exposure and its health burden. Environment International, 139, 105730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Joseph Akua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
