Enhancing Social Sustainability in Automotive Supply Chains: A Framework for Effective Grievance Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijscm.3373Keywords:
Labor Management Relations, Human Rights Law, Automobiles, Social Responsibility, SustainabilityAbstract
Purpose: The automotive industry operates within complex, globalized supply chains characterized by multi-tiered structures and extensive outsourcing, often lacking visibility and accountability for potential human rights violations. Increasingly, regulatory frameworks place explicit obligations on original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), including the requirement to install an effective grievance mechanism along the supply chain. This paper explores how grievance mechanisms can be integrated into automotive supply chain practices to strengthen social sustainability.
Methodology: A qualitative approach was employed, and expert interviews were conducted with a diverse group of stakeholders from the automotive industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), regulatory bodies, suppliers, and unions to provide a well-rounded view of grievance mechanisms in supply chains. The data was analyzed by employing Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis with MAXQDA software to systematically code and identify key themes critical for an effective grievance framework.
Findings: This paper proposes a practical framework for OEMs to address human rights and ethical issues across global networks. It offers a common structure adaptable to industry players, emphasizing accessibility, confidentiality, and trust. It also recommends combining OEM-specific mechanisms with an industry-wide collaboration platform to standardize processes, share best practices, and enable collective action. The study findings support that grievance mechanisms play a crucial role in social sustainability by providing workers with secure channels to report violations. Integrating grievance data into OEMs’ risk assessments enhances proactive risk mitigation.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This research uniquely addresses the gap in academic literature and practice related to social sustainability in supply chains, particularly in grievance mechanisms. In practice, the automotive industry faces fragmented and inconsistent implementation of grievance mechanisms, with the absence of a standardized framework. This paper fills these gaps by developing a comprehensive, industry-specific grievance mechanism framework that ensures accessibility, consistency, and effectiveness across all supply chain tiers.
Downloads
References
th United States of America. (2021). An Act To ensure that goods made with forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China do not enter the United States market, and for other purposes. In Public Law [Legislation]. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ78/pdf/PLAW-117publ78.pdf
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). 2025. About AIAG. https://www.aiag.org/about-aiag
Ajmal, M. M., Khan, M., Hussain, M., & Helo, P. (2018). Conceptualizing and incorporating social sustainability in the business world. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1408714
Amnesty International. (2016, January 19). This is what we die for: Human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo power the global trade in cobalt. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/3183/2016/en/
Amnesty International. (2024, October 15). Recharge for rights: Ranking the human rights due diligence reporting of leading electric vehicle makers. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act30/8544/2024/en/
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). (2024). Antitrust compliance policy. https://www.aiag.org/about/antitrust-compliance-policy
Barron, P. (2023). Social sustainability in development: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century (1st ed.). World Bank Publications.
Blanchard, K. (2024). Intersectionality, marginalised groups & disasters: Bridging the gap – The role of specialised NGOs in inclusive disaster risk reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/media/100886/download?startDownload=20241117
BMW Group. (2025). BMW Group Report – More the ever 2024. https://www.bmwgroup.com/en/report/2024/downloads/BMW-Group-Report-2024-en.pdf
Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276
Borroughens, E., Rys, J., & Wüllenweber, J. (2023, June 8). Enabling socially responsible sourcing throughout the supply chain. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/enabling-socially-responsible-sourcing-throughout-the-supply-chain
Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers.
Bradant, S., & Savourey, E. (2021). The French law on the duty of vigilance: Theoretical and practical challenges since its adoption. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2020.30
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Capgemini Research Institute. (2023). Automotive supply chain: Pursuing long-term resilience. https://prod.ucwe.capgemini.com/de-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/09/Web-Version-of-the-Report-Supply-Chain-in-Automotive.pdf
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
Choudhury, B. (Ed.). (2023). The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A commentary. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375673
Clifford Chance. (2023). Global antitrust challenges for industry climate alliances and cooperation on environmental sustainability. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2023/06/global-antitrust-challenges-for-industry-climate-alliances-and-cooperation-on-environmental-sustainability.pdf
Council of the European Union. (2024, November 19). Products made with forced labor: Council adopts ban [Press release]. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/11/19/products-made-with-forced-labour-council-adopts-ban/
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Davidov, G., Langille, B., & Lester, G. (Eds.). (2024). The Oxford handbook of the law of work. Oxford University Press.
Davis, R., Rees, C., & Ruggie, J. G. (2021). Ten years after: From UN Guiding Principles to multi-fiduciary obligations. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(2), 179–197.
De Schutter, O. (2014). International human rights law: Cases, materials, commentary (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/63754/frontmatter/9781107063754_frontmatter.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2021, July 16). Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz [Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains ] (No. 46). The Bundestag. Retrieved 26.09.2024 https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Internationales/act-corporate-due-diligence-obligations-supply-chains.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
Dresing, T., & Pehl, T. (2019). Transkription [Transcription]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative Forschung [Handbook qualitative studies] (pp. 1–20). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_56-2
Drive Sustainability. (2018, July 1). Material change: A study of risks and opportunities for the collective action in the materials supply chains of the automotive and electronics industries. https://drivesustainability.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Material-Change_VF.pdf
Drive Sustainability. (2023). Drive Sustainability Homepage – About Us. https://www.drivesustainability.org/#:~:text=Drive%20Sustainability%20is%20an%20automotive,performance%20of%20automotive%20supply%20chains.
Drive Sustainability & Automotive Industry Action Group. (2023). Automotive industry guiding principles to enhance sustainability performance in supply chain. https://www.drivesustainability.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Automotive-Sustainability-Guiding-Principles-4.0v2-Final.pdf
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746
Encinas Bartos, K., Schwarzkopf, J., & Mueller, M. (2024). The role of trainings in improving supplier sustainability performance. World Development, 175, 106482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106482
Ethical Trading Initiative. (2019, January). Access to remedy: Practical guidance for companies. https://www.ethicaltrade.org/sites/default/files/shared_resources/Access%20to%20remedy_0.pdf
European Commission. (2024, July 25). Directive on corporate sustainability due diligence: Frequently asked questions. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/7a3e9980-5fda-4760-8f25-bc5571806033_en?filename=240719_CSDD_FAQ_final.pdf
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024, June 13). Directive 2024/1760 on corporate sustainability due diligence. Official Journal of the European Union, 1–18. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj
Fadrany, R., Löffler, S., Gaia-X Association AISBL, T-Systems, & Software AG. (2024, August 8). Gaia-X Perspektiven #2 / 2024. Gaia-X Perspektiven, 1–5. https://gaia-x-hub.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24-08-20_Doku_Gaia-X-Digital-Clearing-House_FINAL.pdf
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2023, April). The German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains: Implications for businesses in partner countries. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/154774/lieferkettengesetz-faktenpapier-partnerlaender-eng-bf.pdf
Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA). (2022, October). Organising, implementing and evaluating complaints procedures: Guidance on the complaints procedure under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. https://www.bafa.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Supply_Chain_Act/guidance_complaints_procedure.pdf
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. (2023). Grievance mechanism – Guideline for the core elements. https://www.bmas.de/EN/Services/Publications/a433e-5-automotive-industry-guideline-grievance-mechanism.html
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) (2023, November). New Publication – Study on Grievance Mechanisms to promote Human Rights in the Mining Industry. https://rue.bmz.de/rue-en/releases/216308-216308
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed., rev., expanded and updated). Sage.
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
Ford Motor Company. (2025). 2024 Integrated Sustainability and Financial Report. https://corporate.ford.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en-us/documents/reports/2024-integrated-sustainability-and-financial-report.pdfGerman Sector Dialogue Automotive Industry. (2022). Concept of the Mecanismo de Reclamación de Derechos Humanos (MRDH). In Sector Dialogue With the Automotive Industry [Report]. https://ulula.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MRDH_Concept_ENG_Website.pdf
Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591
Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075
Gulley, A. L. (2022). One hundred years of cobalt production in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Resources Policy, 79, 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103007
Haroon, S., Wasif, M., Khalid, R., & Khalidi, S. (2021). Supply chain practitioners’ perception on sustainability: An empirical study. Sustainability, 13(17), 9872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179872
Harrison, J., & Wielga, M. (2023). Grievance Mechanisms in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Providing Effective Remedy for Human Rights Violations? Business and Human Rights Journal, 8(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/BHJ.2022.37.
Harvard International Review. (2020, January 15). The Lithium Triangle - Where Chile, Argentina and Bolivia meet. Retrieved 26.10. 2024 https://hir.harvard.edu/lithium-triangle/
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (Second edition). Sage.
Hogan Lovells. (2025, April 23). Staying antitrust compliant: New BAFA guidance on sector initiatives in supply chain due diligence. https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/staying-antitrust-compliant-new-bafa-guidance-on-sector-initiatives-in-supply-chain-due-diligence
Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Implementing socially sustainable practices in challenging institutional contexts: Building theory from seven developing country supplier cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x
Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001
International Labour Organization (ILO), & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2021). Child labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@ipec/documents/publication/wcms_797515.pdf
Islam, M. A., & van Staden, C. J. (2022). Modern slavery disclosure regulation and global supply chains: Insights from stakeholder narratives on the UK Modern Slavery Act. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04878-1
Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2011). Exploring corporate strategy: Text & cases (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kabeer, N., Huq, L., & Sulaiman, M. (2020). Paradigm shift or business as usual? Workers’ views on multi‐stakeholder initiatives in Bangladesh. Development and Change, 51(5), 1360–1398. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12574
Kandel, B. (2020, September 1). Qualitative versus quantitative research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, Article 5, 1–5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352550744_Qualitative_Versus_Quantitative_Research
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Sage.
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice and software (2nd ed.). Sage.
Kvam, R. (2019). Meaningful stakeholder engagement: A joint publication of the multilateral financial institutions group on environmental and social standards. https://www.google.de/books/edition/Meaningful_Stakeholder_Engagement/T5XHDwAAQBAJ
Laplate, L. J. (2023). The wild west of company-level grievance mechanisms: Drawing normative borders to patrol the privatization of human rights remedies. Harvard International Law Journal, 64(2), 311–384. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/wp-content/uploads/sites/84/HLI204_crop-4.pdf
Lewry, J. (2023). Building effective grievance mechanisms: Ten things to consider. Kumi Consulting. https://kumi.consulting/insights/building-effective-grievance-mechanisms-ten-things-to-consider/
Ly, A. M., & Cope, M. R. (2023). New conceptual model of social sustainability: Review from past concepts and ideas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075350
MacCarthy, B. L., Ahmed, W. A., & Demirel, G. (2022). Mapping the supply chain: Why, what and how? International Journal of Production Economics, 250, 108688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108688
McCorquodale, R., Smit, L., Neely, S., & Brooks, R. (2017). Human rights due diligence in law and practice: Good practices and challenges for business enterprises. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2017.2
Mensah, J. (2021). Social sustainability: A dwarf among giants in the sustainable development pillars? Asian Journal of Management, 12(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00019
Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Supply chain social sustainability: A comparative case analysis in Indian manufacturing industries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.219
Markulik, Š., Šolc, M., & Blaško, P. (2024). Use of risk management to support business sustainability in the automotive industry. Sustainability, 16(10), 4308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104308
Masoumi, S. M., Kazemi, N., & Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management in the automotive industry: A process-oriented review. Sustainability, 11(14), 3945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143945
Mathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003
Mercedes-Benz Group AG. (2025). Annual Report 2024: Including Combined Management Report MBG AG. https://group.mercedes-benz.com/documents/investors/reports/annual-report/mercedes-benz/mercedes-benz-annual-report-2024-incl-combined-management-report-mbg-ag.pdf
Morais, D. O. C., & Barbieri, J. C. (2022). Supply chain social sustainability: Unveiling focal firm’s archetypes under the lens of stakeholder and contingency theory. Sustainability, 14(3), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031185
Müller-Hoff, C. (2023). Effective grievance mechanisms in European due diligence legislation: Recommendations for the design of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). https://www.germanwatch.org/sites/default/files/effective_grievance_mechanisms_in_european_due_diligence_legislation_2023_2.pdf
Murray, A., Haynes, K., & Hudson, L. J. (2010). Collaborating to achieve corporate social responsibility and sustainability? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021011089220
Nakamba, C. C., Chan, P. W., & Sharmina, M. (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-12-2016-0436
OECD. (2023). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises on responsible business conduct. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en
Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman. (2008). A guide to designing and implementing grievance mechanisms for development projects. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598641478092542645/pdf/108864-WP-CAO-ENGLISH-Implementing-Grievance-mechanisms-PUBLIC.pdf
Owen, J. R., & Kemp, D. (2024). Corporate responses to community grievance: Voluntarism and pathologies of practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05332-0
Peacock, N., & Mohin, T. (2024, June 27). Why companies must address human rights in their supply chain. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/addressing-human-rights-in-supply-chains
Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Rausch-Phan, M. T. (2022). Sustainable supply chain management: Learning from the German automotive industry. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92156-9
Responsible Business Alliance (RBA). (2023). RBA Voices Protocol. https://www.responsiblebusiness.org/media/docs/RBAVoicesProtocol.pdf
Ripley, M. (2020, October). Getting beyond Tier 1: Using a systems approach to improve working conditions in global supply chains. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/wcms_759213.pdf
Rodríguez Garavito, C. (Ed.). (2017). Business and human rights: Beyond the end of the beginning. Cambridge University Press.
Samsung. (2023, December 26). Grievance handling system: Sustainability in supply chain – Environmental health & safety and GHG emissions management. https://www.samsung.com/global/sustainability/popup/popup_doc/AYUqub0KDvUAIx_C/
Samsung. (2024, February 1). Global grievance resolution policy: Version 1.0 April 2024. https://www.samsung.com/global/sustainability/policy-file/AY8FPchqja4ALYMK/Samsung_Electronics_Global_Grievance_Resolution_Policy.pdf
Santos, R. R. D., Guarnieri, P., Do Carmo Jr., O. M., Dos Reis, S. A., Carvalho, J. M., & Peña, C. R. (2019). The social dimension and indicators of sustainability in agrifood supply chains. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(5), 1476–1498. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i5.894
Saloranta, J. (2021). The EU whistleblowing directive: An opportunity for (operationalizing) corporate human rights grievance mechanisms? European Business Organization Law Review, 22(4), 753–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00226-y
Shiffman, J., & Fu, A. (2022, July 22). Exclusive: Hyundai subsidiary has used child labor at Alabama factory. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-hyundai-subsidiary-has-used-child-labor-alabama-factory-2022-07-22/
Schöggl, J. P., Fritz, M., & Baumgartner, R. (2016). Sustainability assessment in automotive and electronics supply chains—A set of indicators defined in a multi-stakeholder approach. Sustainability, 8(11), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111185
Schumann, S. (2018). Quantitative und qualitative empirische Forschung: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag [Quantitative and qualitative empirical research: A contribution to the discussion]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17834-5
Tan, J., Keiding, J.K. (2023). The cobalt and lithium global supply chains – status, risks, and
recommendations. MiMa Report. http://dx.doi.org/10.22008/gpub/32050
Tang, D. (2024, May 20). Senate report finds parts made with China’s forced labor in cars by BMW, Jaguar Land Rover and VW | AP News. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/96ea10d014cb2c2ed7efa208b1f1d1f1
The Guardian. (2024, February 1). Carmakers may be using aluminium made by Uyghur forced labour, NGO investigation finds. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/feb/01/carmanufacturers-toyota-volkswagen-tesla-general-motors-byd-alleged-forced-labour-aluminium-uyghur
The Houses of Parliament. (03/2015). United Kingdom Modern Slavery Act. The Houses of Parliament. Retrieved 15.10.2024 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/pdfs/ukpga_20150030_en.pdf
Thies, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Spengler, T. S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2019). Assessment of social sustainability hotspots in the supply chain of lithium-ion batteries. Procedia CIRP, 80, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.009
Traub-Merz, R. (Ed.). (2017). The automotive sector in emerging economies: Industrial policies, market dynamics and trade unions. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
United States Department of Labor. (2022). Sweat & Toil: Child labor, forced labor, and human trafficking around the world. Bureau of International Labor Affairs. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2022/2022-Sweat-n-Toil-Magazine-Final.pdf
United States Department of Labor. (2023). 2022 findings on the worst forms of child labor. Bureau of International Labor Affairs. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2022/2022-Findings-on-the-Worst-Forms-of-Child-Labor.pdf
Valerio, P. (2024, October 11). Samsung reckons with labor & supply chain strife. EE Times. https://www.eetimes.com/samsung-reckons-with-labor-supply-chain-strife/
Vandenbroucke, S., Pluut, H., Erkens, Y., & Kantorowicz, J. (2024). Do companies walk the talk? Commitments and actions in global supply chain labor standards. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00103-0
Volkswagen AG. (2025). Annual Report 2024. https://uploads.vw-mms.de/system/production/documents/cws/002/940/file_en/dfed3f8c2cd2a5f5616e3371f8674356349e032e/Y_2024_e.pdf
Walk Free. (2023). Global slavery index 2023. Minderoo Foundation. https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/
Wissuwa, F., & Durach, C. F. (2023). Turning German automotive supply chains into sponsors for sustainability. Production Planning & Control, 34(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1893405
World Benchmarking Alliance. (2023). Automotive manufacturing industry rankings. https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/rankings/industry-automotive-manufacturing/
World Commission on Environment & Development. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Xu, M., Cui, Y., Hu, M., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Liang, S., & Qu, S. (2019). Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.307
Zmuda, P., Heinemann, S., & O’Riordan, L. (Eds.). (2015). New perspectives on corporate social responsibility: Locating the missing link. Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06794-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Laura Marx, Prof. Dr. Wulf-Peter Schmidt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
