The Relationship between Knowledge Sharing Capability and Competitiveness of Chartered Public Universities in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijsm.3042Keywords:
Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Management, Competitiveness, Public UniversitiesAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the relationship between knowledge sharing capability and competitiveness of chartered public universities in Kenya. Universities are knowledge intensive environments, and play a central role in the creation and dissemination of knowledge that they generate. Accordingly, it would be expected that such institutions would adopt proactive approaches to the incubation of knowledge management capability and strategies, and that they would have better insight on how to achieve and optimize the value of their knowledge assets. However, research has shown that this is not the case, and that the approaches adopted by universities are passive and inconsistent. In addition, although there is a strong body of research in the area of knowledge management in commercial environments, and growing interest in knowledge management in public sector organizations, there has been little research on knowledge management capability in universities.
Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive design. The population of the research consisted of 31 chartered public universities authorized to operate in Kenya as at December 2020. The study adopted a census methodology while purposeful and convenient sampling was adopted to select respondents amongst the middle level management staff. The study used both secondary and primary data. A self-administered questionnaire was used as the primary data collection instrument. Out of 155 questionnaires that were sent out, 123 were filled and returned. Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS) was used for data analysis. The study used regression model to estimate the level of significance which yielded a positive and significant influence of knowledge sharing capability on competitiveness of chartered public universities in Kenya.
Findings: The findings pointed out that knowledge sharing capability significantly influenced competitiveness of chartered public universities in Kenya. The public universities should therefore entrench knowledge management practices in their day to day operations in order to remain competitive.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that public universities should embrace knowledge sharing practices in their operations as it enhances competitiveness. One of very important factor in knowledge sharing is that university stakeholders should be accorded with formal, informal and virtual space to interact with each other for knowledge exchange.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, E., & Siddiqi, A. (2005). Knowledge Management In Public Sector Universities of Pakistan. 2005 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, 223–232.
Al-Faris, S. (2010). The role of knowledge management in raising the efficiency of the performance of organizations: a field study on the manufacturing companies of Damascus. Damascus University Journal of Economics, Legal, 26(2), 19–35.
AL-Hakim, L. A. Y., & Hassan, S. (2011). The Role of Middle Managers in Knowledge Management Implementation for Innovation Enhancement. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(1), 86–94.
Al-Khalili, S. M. T. (2006). The role of knowledge management in the Ministry of Education of Jordan Aterbah: an analytical study. Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Al-obaidi, A. H. K., Fahmi, A. M., & Al-hadrawi, H. K. (2018). and Academic Review Advantage for Public universities. 6(1), 44–53.
Bonaccorsi, A. (2016). Addressing the disenchantment: universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, (August 27), 1–28.
Bornemann, M., Graggober, M., Hartieb, E., Hympl, B., Koronakis, P., Primus, A., && Wols. (2003). An Illustrated Guide to Knowledge Management. WissensManagement Forum
Byukusenge, E., Munene, J., & Orobia, L. (2016). Knowledge Management and Business Performance: Mediating Effect of Innovation. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 4(4), 82–92.
Day, G. S. (1994) “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organisations,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4): 37-52.
Donate, M. J., & Canales, J. I. (2012). A new approach to the concept of knowledge strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 22–44.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
Imran, M.K., Ilyas, M., Aslam, U. and Tahreem, F. (2018), “Knowledge processes and firm performance: the mediating effect of employee creativity”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 512-531.
Li, Yuan, Liu, X., Wang, L., & Li, M. (2009). How entrepreneurial orientation moderates the effect of knowledge management on innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(6), 645–660.
Ludwig, G., & Pemberton, J. (2011). A managerial perspective of dynamic capabilities in emerging markets: The case of the Russian steel industry. Journal of East European Management Studies, 16(3), 215–236.
Mohammed, F. (2010). Knowledge management processes and impact in achieving competitive advantage.
Newman, B. D., & Conrad, K. W. (2000). The Framework for Characterizing Knowledge Management Methods, Practices, and Technologies. Knowledge Management Journal. U. Reimer (Ed.), Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM2000) (Vol. 34).
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley.
Qandah, R., Suifan, T.S., Masa’deh, R. and Obeidat, B.Y. (2020), “The impact of knowledge management capabilities on innovation in entrepreneurial companies in Jordan”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, In Press
Rafi, N., Ahmed, A., Shafique, I. and Kalyar, M.N. (2021), “Knowledge management capabilities and organizational agility as liaisons of business performance”, South Asian Journal of Business Studies, In Press,
Servin, G., & De Brún, C. (2005). ABC of knowledge management, NHS National Library for Health: Knowledge Management Specialist Library.
Shaqrah, A. and Alzighaibi, A. (2021), “Linking knowledge management capabilities and the mediating role of the big data capabilities for enterprise value-adding processes”, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, In Press
Skaik, H. A., & Othman, R. (2014). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviour amongst academics in United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 5 (3), 54–70.
Velev, M. (2004). Evaluation and analysis of company competitiveness. Softreyd, S.
Yudina, A. (2006). Terminological aspects of university competitiveness. Gaudeamus Igitur, 4.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203
Zaim, H., Muhammed, S. & Tarim, M. (2019), “Relationship between knowledge management processes and performance: critical role of knowledge utilization in organizations”, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 24-38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Joseph Gachanja, Dr. Jared Deya, Prof. Willy. M. Muturi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
