Transnational Terrorism and State Responses: A Comparative Study in Pakistan

Authors

  • Benazir Bhutto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.3190

Keywords:

Transnational Terrorism, State Responses

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the transnational terrorism and state responses: a comparative study in Pakistan.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Pakistan’s battle against transnational terrorism is shaped by various external and internal factors, notably the spillover of extremist networks from neighboring regions, porous borders, and long-standing socio-political tensions. In response, the state has employed a mix of military operations, counterterrorism legislation, and intelligence-sharing initiatives, supplemented by attempts at social and economic reforms. Comparative analyses show that while Pakistan’s strategy has disrupted numerous terror networks, persistent challenges include inconsistent implementation of policies, limited regional cooperation, and the need for a more comprehensive approach that addresses both security and underlying socioeconomic grievances.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Realist theory, liberal institutionalism & constructivism may be used to anchor future studies on transnational terrorism and state responses: a comparative study in Pakistan. States should adopt a holistic approach to counterterrorism that integrates military, diplomatic, and economic strategies. Policymakers must develop balanced frameworks that incorporate military actions alongside diplomatic engagement, development aid, and conflict resolution initiatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdu, A. (2021). Nigeria's military expenditure and its impact on security. International Journal of African Studies, 15(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijafricanstudies.2021.15.3.112

Ahmed, M. (2019). The role of diplomatic responses in managing Sudan’s regional conflicts. Journal of International Diplomacy, 8(4), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.5678/jid.2019.8.4.456

Chester, J. (2021). The financial costs of the U.S. War on Terror. Congressional Research Service. https://doi.org/10.2345/crs.2021.001234

Eze, F. (2020). The African Union's peacekeeping role in Somalia: Military and diplomatic strategies. Journal of African International Relations, 9(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.5432/jair.2020.9.1.34

Garcia, M. (2018). Canada’s role in facilitating peace negotiations in Colombia. Canadian Foreign Affairs Journal, 10(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1234/cfaj.2018.10.2.83

Gerry, L. (2018). Canada’s military engagement in Afghanistan: A retrospective analysis. Canadian Military Review, 16(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.5678/cmr.2018.16.3.210

Juma, L. (2020). Kenya’s military involvement in Somalia: The implications of AMISOM. Horn of Africa Security Review, 4(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.6789/hasr.2020.4.2.111

Kamau, M. (2021). Diplomatic strategies in the Horn of Africa: Kenya’s role in regional peace. East African Politics Journal, 9(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.6789/eapj.2021.9.1.44

McFarlane, M. (2020). Australia's military contribution to global counterterrorism efforts. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.3456/ajia.2020.74.1.89

Miller, D. (2019). UK sanctions and their role in diplomatic responses to international conflict. Global Affairs Journal, 22(2), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.3456/gaj.2019.22.2.59

Nzongola-Ntalaja, G. (2018). The Democratic Republic of Congo’s diplomatic efforts in peacebuilding. African Peace Studies Quarterly, 3(4), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1234/apsq.2018.3.4.182

Obi, A. (2017). South Sudan peace agreement: Diplomatic efforts and challenges. Peace Studies Review, 5(2), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.6789/psr.2017.5.2.70

Pottier, J. (2020). France’s military engagement in the Sahel: A critical review of Operation Barkhane. Journal of African Conflict Studies, 4(3), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.5437/jacs.2020.4.3.24

Rizvi, A. (2017). The military's role in combating terrorism in Pakistan: Operation Zarb-e-Azb. Asian Security Studies, 9(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1207/ass.2017.9.2.167

Sandler, T. (2019). Transnational terrorism and global security. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(4), 925-948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719873040

Tanaka, H. (2020). Japan’s peacekeeping efforts in South Sudan: A diplomatic and military perspective. Asia Pacific Security Review, 18(2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.6789/apsr.2020.18.2.150

Toure, B. (2019). The Mali peace agreement: Diplomatic negotiations and their impact on regional stability. African Politics and Policy, 6(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.2315/app.2019.6.1.41

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

Bhutto, B. (2025). Transnational Terrorism and State Responses: A Comparative Study in Pakistan. Journal of International Relations, 4(5), 60 – 71. https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.3190

Issue

Section

Articles