Resource Allocation Influence on Performance of County Government Funded Water Projects in Kisii County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jppa.3134Keywords:
Resource Allocation, Performance, M&E Practices, County Government Funded Water ProjectsAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine how resource allocation influences performance of M&E practices on county government funded water projects in Kisii County.
Methodology: The study will adopt a descriptive survey design. The study target population includes 201 county water staff managing 90 water projects across the county. The census method was used to research the 201 staff involved in water projects. The primary data was collected by use of questionnaires and Key Informant interviews. Quantitative data was analyzed by employing descriptive statistics and inferential analysis, and the results were presented by tables and figures. Whereas, qualitative data was done through narrative analysis and presented in form of verbatim and narrations.
Findings: findings indicated that a mere 12.9% of the participants agreed that the county government allocated a specific budget for M&E activities, while 12.4% strongly agreed. However, a significant 38.2% disagreed with this allocation. Similarly, the budget's adequacy came under scrutiny, with only 3.5% deeming it sufficient, while 37.6% disagreed. Infrastructure provision for M&E activities raised uncertainty among 8.8% of respondents, and only 16.5% agreed on its adequacy. Furthermore, while the allocation of adequate human resources for M&E garnered strong agreement (31.8%), it was met with disagreement by 14.7% of participants.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This study was anchored in the change theory. The county government of Kisii County can capitalize on this finding by prioritizing adequate resource allocation for M&E activities. This capitalizing may involve dedicating specific budgets, ensuring infrastructure provision, and allocating sufficient human resources. Policymakers and project managers should closely evaluate the resource allocation process, addressing concerns raised by participants in the study. Adequate resources lay the foundation for streamlined operations, data collection, and stakeholder engagement. By recognizing the strategic significance of resource allocation, the county government can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of water project implementation.
Downloads
References
British Council. (2017). Youth Employment in Kenya: Literature Review.
Caitlin, B. M., & Linda, K. (2018). Diagnosing monitoring and evaluation Capacity in Africa. African Evaluation Journal.
Cedare, M. E. (2015). Monitoring and Evaluation in Water and its relation to the Millennium Development Goals. UN Water.
Chege, F. ,., & Dr. Omondi, B. (2020). MONITORING AND EVALUATION AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE IN KENYA:THE CASE OF NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS IMPLEMENTING EDUCATION PROJECTS IN NAIROBI COUNTY. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management , 3(6), 312-337.
Chukwuma, O. M. (2016). Community Participation in the Rural Water Supply Sector of Enugu State, Nigeria. American Journal of Water Resources, 4(3), 58-67.
Cleophas et al. (2017). Effect of Contractor Capacity and Monitoring and Evaluation on Completion of Water Projects among Water Services Boards in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Management, Science & Technology, 5(1), 163-167.
David, M., & Mike, O. (2015). Engaging Stakeholders for Project Success. PMI (Project Management Institute) White Paper.
Equileap. (2019). Gender Equality in Kenya:Assessing 60 leading companies on workplace equality. Speciak Report.
Esteves, J., Pastor, J., & Casanovas, J. (2002). A Framework Proposal for Monitoring and Evaluating Training in ERP Implementation Projects.
GLAAS. (2022). STRONG SYSTEMS AND SOUND INVESTMENTS EVIDENCE ON AND KEY INSIGHTS INTO ACCELERATING PROGRESS ON SANITATION DRINKING-WATER AND HYGIENE. UN WATER.
Gladysz, K. D., & Gurtner, M. R. (2021). Effect of Stakeholder Involvement on Performance of The Government Projects in Poland. Stratford Peer reviewed Journals and Books.
Government of Lebanon. (2019). Lebanon Digital Transformation: Strategies to Actions.
Hlatshwayo, N., & Govender, K. (2015). Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in South Africa. Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, 2(2), 91-99.
IFRC(International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent societies. (2011). Project/programme monitoring and evaluation (M&E) guide. Switzerland.
Ika, L., & Jan, S.-M. (2014). Why do Projects Fail in Africa. Journal of African Business, 15(3), 151-155.
Internationl Labour organization (ILO). (n.d.). Basic Principles of Monitoring and evaluation.
Joe, G., Jammie, S., Mary, A., & Don, B. (2010). Methodology for Monitoring and Evaluating progress in Water supply, sanitation and water resources management in West Africa. The Global Water Institute, International Institute for Environment and Development,ITAD Water.
KNBS. (2019). KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS QUARTERLY LABOR FORCE REPORT.
Mgoba, S., & Kabote, S. (2020). Effectiveness of participatory monitoring and evaluation on achievement of community-based water projects in Tanzania. Applied Water Science.
National Council for Law Reports. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya.
PMBOK® Guide. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (7TH ed.).
Roba, Q. M., & Odollo, L. (2022). MONITORING AND EVALUATION PRACTICES ON PERFORMANCE OF WATER PROJECTS IN MARSABIT COUNTY, KENYA. International Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship, 210-228.
Senelwa, D. A. (2021). PROJECT LEVEL MONITORING,EVALUATION AND REPORTING MANUAL. The Anaya Senelwa International Limited(TASIL).
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Scientific Research: An academic Publisher, 6.
UNDP. (2009). HANDBOOK ON PLANNING,MONITORING AND EVALUATING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS. NEW YORK: UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME.
UNESCO. (2006). Gender Inequalities in Kenya.
United Nations Development Group . (2017). THEORY OF CHANGE.
USAID. (2020). Gender Fact Sheet Kenya.
USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation. (2000). RECENT PRACTICES IN MONITORING AND EVALUATION:Measuring Institutional Capacity.
WASREB. (2022). A Performance Report of Kenya’s Water Services Sector – 2020/21. Nairobi, Kenya: Water Services Regulatory Board.
Waweru, S. W., & Dr Kimathi, D. (2022, October 19th). PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION PRACTICES ON PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENT WATER AND SANITATION PROJECTS IN MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA. Social Sciences & Humanities Open(3), 96-105.
WellAware. (2023). The Challenges & Successes of Implementing Clean Water Projects in East Africa. Well Aware.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mutuku Mary Miombe, Dr. Josephat Kwasira, PhD, Dr. Benard Lango, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
