Inclusiveness and Social Equity as Strategic Drivers of Co-operatives’ Innovation and Performance: Evidence from Rwamagana District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ejbsm.3886Keywords:
Inclusiveness, Social Equity, Performance, InnovationAbstract
Purpose: The study examined how inclusiveness, social equity, innovation and adaptability influence co-operatives performance and sustainability, drawing on Social Equity Distribution Theory (SEDT), Inclusive Participation Theory (IPT) and Resource-Based View (RBV).
Methodology: Using a survey from 45 co-operatives’ leaders, the research assessed perceptions of fairness, equity and participation in different activities of co-operatives.
Findings: Results show balanced gender (52% women, 48% men) and youth (46%) representation, but persons with disabilities remain significantly underrepresented (7%). While strong democratic literacy and cooperation reflect high social capital, leadership representation for youth and disabled members remains limited. Benefit-sharing emerged as a critical challenge. Although 82% acknowledged the existence of non-discrimination policies, 57% perceived inequities in financial distribution, highlighting a gap between policy and practice. Members emphasized strong internal assets such as participation (91%), solidarity (79%) and trust (84%), but 61% expressed concerns over financial sustainability and weak strategic planning. Adaptability and innovation findings were mixed. While 71% agreed that leadership encourages innovation, only 47% felt that co-operatives effectively adapt to challenges and 42% reported that their suggestions were ignored. This reflects gaps in translating innovative intents into responsive actions. Co-operatives demonstrate strong developmental outcomes:71% credited them as reducing poverty, promoting solidarity (89%), driving national development (71%) and job creation (62%). At personal level, 80% reported improved practices and 65% gained confidence in personal goals. However, market performance remains uncertain (40%).
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Overall, co-operatives are socially impactful but constrained by inequitable benefits sharing, weak disability inclusion and limited competitiveness. It is recommended that sustainability be strengthened by enhancing transparency in benefits sharing, advancing inclusion of marginalized groups, bridging the gap between innovation and adaptability and boosting market competitiveness and expansion through strategic planning. Robust policy implementation is imperative to ensure fairness, foster inclusiveness and achieve lasting socio-economic impact.
Downloads
References
Bell, K., & Reed, M. (2022). The tree of participation: A new model for inclusive decision-making. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab026
Boadu, C., Koomson, F., & Ntiri, R. O. (2024). Social and solidarity economy and social inclusion of co-operatives in the Assin Fosu Municipality, Ghana. Heliyon, 10(5), Article e26868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26868
Borda-Rodriguez, A., & Johnson, H. (2020). Inclusive development and co-operatives. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00278-4
Bronfenbrenner, M. (2017). Income distribution theory. Routledge.
Bucos, T. (2024). Social and solidarity economy: Principles and contributions to sustainable development and social inclusion. European Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 114–127.
Cappelen, A. W., Eichele, T., Hugdahl, K., Specht, K., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), 15368–15372. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410896111
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2016). Rethinking membership and participation in an inclusive democracy: Cognitive disability, children, animals. In B. Arneil & N. Hirschmann (Eds.), Disability and Political Theory (pp. 168–197). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316337756.008
Esfandani, V. (2025). The role of management strategies in fostering innovation and business sustainability development. The Applied Business & Management Review, 1(1).
Frederickson, H. G. (2015). Social equity and public administration: Origins, developments, and applications. Routledge.
Gooden, S., & Starke, A. (2021). Social equity and public administration. In B. Guy Peters & I. Thynne (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Public Administration and Management (pp. 43–53). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100349.00011
Gupta, A., & Gupta, N. (2022). Research methodology. SBPD Publications.
Gupta, J., Pouw, N. R. M., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2015). Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.30
Kahamba, J. S., & Xiuli, X. (2021). Effects of women’s co-operatives on capabilities and gender relations: Empirical evidence from women’s dairy co-operatives in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, 8(4), 62–80.
Kharel, T. R. (2024). The role of co-operative on the socio-economic growth and stability. Journal of Durgalaxmi, 3, 273–289.
Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. (2013). Conducting research in human geography: Theory, methodology and practice. Routledge.
Kumar, A., & Praveenakumar, S. G. (2025). Research methodology. Authors Click Publishing.
Lucas, K., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
Madhani, P. M. (2010). Resource based view (RBV) of competitive advantage: An overview. In P. M. Madhani (Ed.), Resource based view: Concepts and practices (pp. 3–22).
Mitteboga, D. E. (2024). Strategies for co-operative empowerment in Keerom Regency, Papua Province: Enhancing community development and economic resilience. Journal of Management and Economics, 4(10), 1–5.
Rachmad, Y. E. (2022). Inclusive integration theory. Bremer Stadtmusikanten Buch Internationaler Verlag.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Saz-Gil, I., Bretos, I., & Díaz-Foncea, M. (2021). Co-operatives and social capital: A narrative literature review and directions for future research. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020534
Staszowski, E. (2018). Inclusive iteration: Participation as method in design theory and practice. In Public Interest Design Education Guidebook (pp. 179–181). Routledge.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. W. W. Norton & Company.
Theeuwen, A., Duplat, V., Wickert, C., & Tjemkes, B. (2021). How do women overcome gender inequality by forming small-scale co-operatives? The case of the agricultural sector in Uganda. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041797
Xiong, M., Yu, D., & Xiao, H. (2025). The complex role of knowledge diversity in firm's collaborative innovation under inclusive culture. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 28577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13884-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Appoline Kabera Bazubagira, Christine Kapita Umumararungu, Javan Semana, Barahira Anitha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
