INFLUENCE OF THE ADOPTION OF MOBILE MONEY PAYMENT STRATEGY ON ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE OF NANYUKI WATER AND SEWERAGE COMPANY, KENYA
Keywords:
Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Costs, Perceived Trust, Perceived Usefulness, PerformanceAbstract
Purpose: To establish the influence of mobile money payment strategy on the performance of Nanyuki Water and Sewerage Company.
Methodology: The study utilized a descriptive research design.
Findings: The findings revealed that perceived ease of use, perceived costs, perceived trust and perceived usefulness have a positive and significant effect on the performance of NAWASCO. This was also supported by the regression results which revealed that perceived ease of use, perceived costs, perceived trust and perceived usefulness had a positive and significant effect n organization performance as supported by a beta coefficient of 0.111 and a p value of 0.004.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The general public will be informed about the influence of adoption of mobile money payment strategy on organization performance. This follows the maxim that "˜information is power' and hence empowers the users as well as providers of the service gearing towards improved services. Nanyuki Water and Sewerage Company will be informed on the influence of adoption of mobile money payment strategy on organization performance. This will enable the management to make relevant adjustments so as to encourage their clients to pay their water bills using mobile money payment. This will make their operations easier and thus result to improved performance. For the policy makers and agencies like the Central bank of Kenya (CBK), the findings of this study will be important in informing the policy formulation especially with regard to regulating the mobile money transfer services. The research findings add dimension that may help improve policy direction with regard to regulation of MMT as well as factors that spur economic growth. As for scholars and academicians, this study will be important in providing information on the influence of adoption of mobile money payment strategy on organization performance. Nevertheless, the research will also suggests areas of further studies where future scholars and researchers can seek more knowledge or better still corroborate emerging theories.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dolan, J. (2009). Accelerating the Development of Mobile Money Ecosystems. Proceeding of Mobile Money Summit.
Donner, J., & Tellez, C. A. (2012). Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption, impact, and use. Asian Journal of Communication, 18(4), 318-332.
Hernandez, J. & Mazzon, A. (2006). Adoption of Internet Banking: Proposition and Implementation of an Integrated Methodology Approach, International Journal of Bank Marketing 25, (2), 72 - 88.
Hu, X., Li, W., & Hu, Q. (2008). Are mobile payment and banking the killer apps for mobile commerce?. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual (pp. 84-84). IEEE.
Hughes, N., & Lonie, S. (2007). M-PESA: mobile money for the "unbanked" turning cellphones into 24-hour tellers in Kenya. Innovations, 2(1-2), 63-81.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191-204.
Mas, I., & Kumar, K. (2008). Banking on mobiles: why, how, for whom?. CGAP Focus Note, (48).
Mesfin, W., Gronli, T. M., Ghinea, G., & Younas, M. (2015). A Mobile Money Solution for Illiterate Users. In Mobile Services (MS), 2015 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 328-335). IEEE.
Moore, C. & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology, Information Systems Research, 2(3).
Morawczynski, O., & Pickens, M. (2009). Poor people using mobile financial services: observations on customer usage and impact from M-PESA.
Ndiwalana, A., & Popov, O. (2008). Mobile Payments: A Comparison between Philippine and Ugandan Contexts.
Ojanji, N. (2013). The effect of mobile money uptake on financial performance of non-governmental organizations in Kenya (Unpublished Thesis) Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
Rogers, M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation's, New York: Free Press,
Tan, W., Tan, B. I., & Ooi, K. B. (2011). Cash, credit card or mobile phone? Exploring the intention to adopt mobile credit card: A conceptual model. In The 2nd international research symposium in Service Management Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Tobbin, P. E. (2010). Modeling adoption of mobile money transfer: a consumer behaviour analysis. In The 2nd International Conference on Mobile Communication Technology for Development.
Tobbin, P., & Kuwornu, J. K. (2011). Adoption of mobile money transfer technology: Structural equation modeling approach. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(7), 59-77.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.