Innovation in Procurement Processes: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and Egypt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/gjppm.2952Keywords:
Innovation, Procurement ProcessesAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the innovation in procurement processes: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Egypt.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: South Korea is highlighted for its advanced e-procurement systems, leveraging technology to enhance transparency, efficiency, and accountability. This has led to significant cost savings and improved supplier management. In contrast, Egypt, while making strides in modernizing procurement practices, faces challenges such as bureaucratic inefficiencies and limited technological adoption.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Diffusion of innovations theory, the resource-based view (RBV) & institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on innovation in procurement processes: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Egypt. Create a framework for exchanging best practices between South Korea and Egypt. Advocate for the development of a comprehensive policy framework that promotes innovation in procurement.
Downloads
References
Agyekum, K., & Mensah, J. (2022). The impact of mobile payment systems on SMEs in Ghana: An empirical analysis. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2021-0085
Awad, K., & Murtaza, H. (2020). Institutional theory in public procurement: Implications for Egypt and South Korea. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1078-1092.
Bekele, W., Kebede, T., & Haile, S. (2022). Precision agriculture in Ethiopia: Advances and challenges. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 12(4), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12300-022-01001-9
Choi, H. (2023). Technological innovations in South Korean public procurement: Implications for emerging economies. International Journal of Procurement Management, 16(1), 88-106.
Drouin, N., Paquin, R., & Hargadon, A. (2020). The impact of agile methodologies on public project management in Canada. Project Management Journal, 51(2), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819888352
El-Gazzar, A., & El-Husseiny, M. (2019). Public procurement reforms in Egypt: Analyzing the innovation gap. Middle Eastern Journal of Public Policy, 6(3), 245-263.
Gupta, R., Singh, R., & Sharma, S. (2020). Impact of technology-driven innovations on supply chain performance in India: A statistical analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 58(14), 4231-4245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1739176
Hassan, S. (2020). Exploring innovation in public procurement in Egypt: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 364-376.
Kagermann, H., Lukas, W., & Wahlster, W. (2020). Industry 4.0: Smart manufacturing for the future. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(5), 907-921. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2020-0021
Kwon, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Assessing the role of e-procurement in South Korea: A model for developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1120-1136.
Lundberg, L., Sörqvist, P., & Stigzelius, I. (2021). Automation in Swedish manufacturing: Trends and outcomes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 143(6), 061012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046524
Mhando, L., Munga, J., & Mjema, E. (2020). Mobile applications and market access for smallholder farmers in Tanzania. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2019.14195
Mohamed, M., & Zaki, R. (2022). Impact of supplier innovation on procurement performance in Egypt. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(2), 150-167.
Moyo, I., & Mwale, S. (2021). The impact of digital technologies on operational efficiency in the mining sector: A case study of South Africa. Journal of Business Research, 129, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.051z
Mzzzugisha, J., Akiiki, J., & Sserwanga, A. (2021). The role of digital health technologies in improving healthcare delivery in Uganda. Health Informatics Journal, 27(4), 14604582211010312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211010312
Muriuki, A., Makena, E., & Ochieng, M. (2021). The impact of mobile technology on agricultural supply chains in Kenya: A case study analysis. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(3), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2020.15021
Nguyen, H., & Pham, T. (2020). Lean manufacturing in Vietnam's textile industry: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107663
Park, C., & Yoo, Y. (2021). Comparative study of public procurement innovations in South Korea and Egypt. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 930-945.
Rahman, M., & Khatun, M. (2022). Lean manufacturing in Bangladesh's ready-made garment industry: An impact assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 60(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1944556
Sari, I., & Prabowo, H. (2021). Digital procurement: Enhancing efficiency and transparency in Indonesia. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-2020-0056
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2019). Case studies in operations management: A review of the literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(5), 632-668. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2018-0027
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2019). Lean solutions: How companies and customers can create value and wealth together. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msr.2019.06.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Blessing Makoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
