Internal Communication and Employee Productivity in the Ready-Mix Concrete Industry, Kiambu County
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.3257Keywords:
Internal Communication, Employee Productivity, Ready-Mix Concrete IndustryAbstract
Purpose: This research sought to investigate internal communication and employee productivity in the ready-mix concrete industry in Kiambu County.
Methodology: The study was guided by two theories which are: Systems Theory and Organizational Information Theory. For the research methodology, mixed-methodology research design was used in the study which combined both qualitative and quantitative data. The target population of the study was 134 employees. However, only 88 of the employees took part in the study from the Companies-Rhombus Concrete and Sidai Concrete, with systematic random sampling method being used to select them. The research tools used for data collection included questionnaires that had Likert-scale which were distributed to the general employees while Key Informant Interviews were done on the managers. The quantitative data collected was analysed through descriptive and correlation statistics using SPSS and presented using tables and figures, while qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis.
Findings: The findings were internal communication strategies had limited impact on employee productivity, in that text messages WhatsApp, and calling methods had measurable impressions. Broad communication strategies were proven ineffective, but specific platforms and tools directly enhanced communication and general work productivity. Factors such as batching processes, employee skills and equipment setup were stauncher predictors of productivity. Unambiguous communication processes, job satisfaction and actionable feedback, proved to majorly impact productivity outcomes. Internal communication hurdles have a lesser impact on employee productivity, with a minor negative relationship.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Theory: The study was guided by Systems Theory. Organizations through their departments are working to holistically address these issues by implementing enhanced tools, regular meetings, and rational communication channels. However, the research model calls for further research so as to explore new variables affecting productivity reason being the current models fails to account for meaningful variation in productivity levels. Major recommendations entail: employee development through training, real-time communications in organizations, establish and maintain clear communication channels, support honest employee feedback and establish company policies that match current communication needs.
Downloads
References
Alberca, P., & Parte, L. (2018). Operational efficiency evaluation of restaurant firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1959-1977.
Atambo, W. N., & Momanyi, D. K. (2016). Effects of internal communication on employee performance: a case study of Kenya power and lighting company, South Nyanza Region, Kenya. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 2(5), p. 328-340.
Bednárik, J. (2019). Internal Communication and its Impact on the Efficient Functioning of the Company. Political Preferences, (22), 31-42.
Bjarnason, E., Wnuk, K., & Regnell, B. (2011, August). Requirements are slipping through the gaps—A case study on causes & effects of communication gaps in large-scale software development. In 2011 IEEE 19th international requirements engineering conference (pp. 37-46). IEEE.
Coffey, G. (2009). A systems approach to leadership: How to create sustained high performance in a complex and uncertain environment. Springer Science & Business Media.
DiGaetano, R. (2013). Sample frame and related sample design issues for surveys of physicians and physician practices. Evaluation & the health professions, 36(3), 296-329.
Duan, W., Li, H., Sun, J., & Yang, G. (2022). Standardization of the strategy translation process, procedural fairness in budgeting and firm performance. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(3), 100254.
Dutta A, Steiner E, Proulx J, Berisha V, Bliss DW, Poole S, et al. (2021) Analyzing the relationship between productivity and human communication in an organizational setting. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0250301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250301
Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. D., & Swanson, D. (2019). Collaborative capability and organizational performance: Assessing strategic choice and purity. International Journal of Production Economics, 214, 139-150.
Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (2017). Definition of system. In Systems Research for Behavioral Science (pp. 81-92). Routledge.
Hayase, L.K. T. (2009). International communication in organizations and employee engagement (Doctroral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas),
Hayes, A. (2023). Public Relations (PR) Meaning, Types, and Practical Examples. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/public-relations-pr.asp
Jackson, M. C. (2007). Systems approaches to management. Springer Science & Business Media. KLUWER academic publishers.
Kibe, C. W. (2014). Effects of communication strategy on organizational performance: A case study of Kenya Ports Authority. European journal of business and management, 6(11), p. 6-10.
Krambia-Kapardis, M., Zopiatis, A., & Varnavas, A. (2018). Supply chain management and organizational performance: The mediating effects of organizational learning and knowledge management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(5), 1319-1344.
Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2015). Goal-setting theory. In Organizational Behavior 1 (pp. 159-183). Routledge.
Martinez, L. A. M., & Hurtado, S. R. F. (2018). Internal communication issues in the firms: Does it affect the productivity? Rev. Eur. Stud., 10, 1.
Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2002). Leader Communication Strategies Critical Paths to Improving Employee Commitment. American Business Review, 20(2).
Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2017). Project management: a strategic managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 323-338.
Mubarok, E. S., & Darmawan, J. (2019). The influence of training, motivation, and work ethics on the internal communication and their impact on the employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 11(24), 86-93.
Palakurti, N. R. (2023). Governance Strategies for Ensuring Consistency and Compliance in Business Rules Management. Transactions on Latest Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 4(4).
Rakov, M., & De Ridder, J. (2022). Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Present and Futures Study.
Ruesch, J., Bateson, G., Pinsker, E.C., & Combs, G. (2017). Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080932
Sadia, A., Salleh, B. M., Kadir Z. A., & Sanif, S. (2016). The relationship between organizational communication and employees’ productivity with new dimensions of effective communication flow. Journal of business and social review in emerging economics, 2(2), p. 93-100
Saratun, M. (2016). Performance management to enhance employee engagement for corporate sustainability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 84-102.
Smith, L., & Mounter, P. (2008). Effective internal communication. Kogan Page Publishers.
Sumarno, A. and M. Ali Iqbal (2022) “The Effect Of Internal Communication And Employee Well-Being On Employee Performance, Mediated Through Employee Engagement (Study At Pt Wuza)”, Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), pp. 1015–1031. doi: 10.31933/dijms.v3i6.1303
Swaen, B. & George, T. (2024, March 18). What Is a Conceptual Framework? | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/conceptual-framework/
Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711-730.
Verčič, A. T., & Špoljarić, A. (2020). Managing internal communication: How the choice of channels affects internal communication satisfaction. Public relations review, 46(3), 101926. Zagreb, Croatia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101926
Weckowicz, T. E. (2000). Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972): A pioneer of general systems theory. URL:< http://www.univie.ac.at/aoc/rj/bert1.
Welch, M. (2012). Appropriateness and acceptability: employee perspectives of internal communication. Public Relations Review, Volume 38, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 246-254. Lancashire Business School, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 June Wangeci Githaiga, Dr. Musuruve Inimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
