Development and Evaluation of Gender-Sensitive Policies and Interventions that Aim to Promote Gender Equality and Justice in Different Sectors and Levels of Society in Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijgs.2356Keywords:
Development, Evaluation, Gender-Sensitive Policies, Interventions, Promote Gender Equality, Justice Different SectorsAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the development and evaluation of gender-sensitive policies and interventions that aim to promote gender equality and justice in different sectors and levels of society.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Gender-sensitive policies and interventions are vital for promoting equality and justice across sectors and society. Effective approaches prioritize intersectionality and aim to reduce disparities while increasing access and participation. Evaluation focuses on outcomes like resource access, reduced disparities, and enhanced decision-making power. Continuous monitoring ensures ongoing effectiveness and relevance.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Feminist theory, social constructionist theory & intersectionality theory may be used to anchor future studies on the development and evaluation of gender-sensitive policies and interventions that aim to promote gender equality and justice in different sectors and levels of society. Involve stakeholders from marginalized communities, including women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and other underrepresented groups, in the design, implementation, and evaluation of gender-sensitive policies to ensure their relevance and effectiveness. Advocate for the adoption of gender-sensitive budgeting practices at all levels of government to ensure that resources are allocated equitably
Downloads
References
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page range. DOI:XX.XXXXXXX
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Catalyst. (2020). Women in Management: Quick Take. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management-quick-take/
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167.
Duflo, E. (2012). Women's empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-1079.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Review Press.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2019). Work-life balance measures for persons of all ages: Extending and enabling choices. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/work-life-balance-measures-persons-all-ages-extending-and-enabling-choices
Holmes, R., & Jones, N. (2019). Gender equality and justice programming: an evidence review. World Development, 115, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.024
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24.
Klasen, S., Minasyan, A., & Grosse, M. (2019). Gender equality in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-dimensional analysis. Social Indicators Research, 143(2), 615-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1950-0
Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429-450.
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls' and women's education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2020). One in Five Children, Adolescents and Youth is Out of School. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/one-five-children-adolescents-and-youth-out-school
UNICEF. (n.d.). Gender Equality Database. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/topic/gender/overview/
United States Census Bureau. (2021). Income and Poverty in the United States: 2020. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-273.html
World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Asahi Isamu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
