Impact of Political Ideologies on Civic Engagement in South Korea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijs.3206Keywords:
Political Ideologies Civic EngagementAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of political ideologies on civic engagement in South Korea.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Political ideologies significantly influence civic engagement in South Korea, where citizens' political leanings often shape their participation in social and political activities. Conservative ideologies are typically associated with formal engagement, such as voting and policy advocacy, while progressive ideologies are linked to grassroots movements and activism on social issues. A key finding is that South Koreans with strong ideological identities are more likely to participate in civic activities, as these beliefs often align with specific causes or political agendas. Furthermore, generational divides play a role; younger progressives tend to engage in digital activism, while older conservatives favor traditional forms of participation.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Civic voluntarism model, social identity theory & theory of planned behavior may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of political ideologies on civic engagement in South Korea. To foster greater civic engagement, practical steps should be taken to encourage participation in ideologically diverse groups. Policymakers should consider reforming electoral systems to ensure that they reflect the diversity of political ideologies within a society.
Downloads
References
Australian Electoral Commission. (2019). Federal election 2019: Report on voter participation. Australian Electoral Commission. https://www.aec.gov.au
Bhat, S. (2021). Digital divide and civic engagement: Access and participation in rural India. Indian Journal of Social Research, 42(2), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974921221100800
Brown, J. (2020). Conservatism and its impact on civic engagement. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323949
Colorado State University. (2023). Trust in elections shapes more than just voter turnout, study reveals. Retrieved from https://source.colostate.edu/political-party-voter-turnout-research/
Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., & Menczer, F. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political communication: Evidence from Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1010
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2020). Volunteering in America: National service trends. CNCS. https://www.nationalservice.gov/
Correa, T., & Camargo, R. (2016). Political ideology and social media engagement: The case of the 2015 Colombian regional elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1186678
Dutch Electoral Council. (2021). 2021 Dutch general elections voter turnout. Electoral Council of the Netherlands. https://www.kiesraad.nl
Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2017-0022
Election Commission of India. (2019). General election 2019: Voter turnout report. Election Commission of India. https://eci.gov.in
Federal Returning Officer. (2021). 2021 federal election: Voter participation in Germany. Federal Returning Officer. https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de
Gaisbauer, F., Pournaki, A., Banisch, S., & Olbrich, E. (2020). Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01666. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01666
Green, D., & Browne, E. (2020). The role of social media in Australian political engagement. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 378-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1823812
IBOPE. (2018). Brazilian elections and voter participation: Trends and analysis. IBOPE. https://www.ibopeinteligencia.com
Independent Electoral Commission. (2019). 2019 South Africa national elections voter turnout. Independent Electoral Commission. https://www.elections.org.za
Independent Electoral Commission. (2019). South Africa's 2019 national election results. IEC South Africa. https://www.elections.org.za
Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques. (2017). French presidential election 2017: Voter turnout analysis. INSEE. https://www.insee.fr
Jones, R. (2018). Socialism and collective political action: The role of civic engagement. Social Justice Review, 22(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socjusrev
Mantovani, M. C., Costa, A., & Ladeira, C. (2013). Political ideology and voter engagement in Brazilian elections: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Science, 11(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.13082857
Mutiga, M. (2020). The rise of digital activism and its impact on Kenyan elections. Journal of African Political Studies, 14(4), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japs.2020.01.004
National Commission for Civic Education. (2020). Civic engagement in Ghana: Voter turnout and participation in democracy. NCGE Ghana. https://www.ncge.gov.gh
National Election Commission of Korea. (2020). 2020 South Korea legislative elections: Voter participation. NEC Korea. https://www.nec.go.kr
Nishimura, H. (2019). Political participation in Japan: Trends and transformations. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1600142
Parliament. (2019). Petitions and political activism in the UK: A report on the Brexit petitions. UK Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk
Pew Research Center. (2020). India’s digital landscape: Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org
Smith, A. (2019). Liberalism and democratic participation: A case for increased civic engagement. Journal of Political Theory, 14(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0898658
Statistics Canada. (2019). Volunteerism in Canada: National survey. Statistics Canada. https://www.statcan.gc.ca
Statistics Netherlands. (2019). Volunteerism in the Netherlands: National statistics. Statistics Netherlands. https://www.cbs.nl
Swedish Election Authority. (2018). Sweden general election 2018: Voter turnout analysis. Swedish Election Authority. https://www.val.se
Williams, P. (2021). Nationalism and civic engagement in modern democracies. International Politics, 28(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159821
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Park Min
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.