Factors Contributing to Extreme Polarization of the Society in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijs.1825Keywords:
Extreme polarization, Society, PoliticsAbstract
Purpose: The study sought to analyze the factors contributing to extreme polarization of the society in South Africa
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The results show that polarization is strongly path dependent and sensitive to stochastic variation. Second, polarization depends strongly on the initial distribution of opinions in the population. In the absence of extremists, polarization may be mitigated. Noisy communication can drive a population toward more extreme opinions and even cause acute polarization. Finally, the apparent reduction in polarization under increased cultural complexity arises via a particular property of the polarization measurement, under which a population containing a wider diversity of extreme views is deemed less polarized.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The social comparison theory and Robert Tallisie theory may be used to anchor future studies in the political sector. The study results will also benefit other stakeholders such as the policy makers as well as researchers and scholars from different parts of the world. The top management of politics in the country will also use the study findings to improve the society and ensure high and stable performance in all their activities and programs. The study recommends that the adoption of effective social protection development policies in the society will help to improve efficiency in their major operations and activities. This work has implications for understanding the population dynamics of beliefs opinions and polarization as well as broader implications for the analysis of agent-based models of social phenomena.
Downloads
References
Baldassarri, D., & Page, S. E. (2021). The emergence and perils of polarization. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 118(50), e2116863118.
Barbieto Iglesias, R., & Iglesias Alonso, Ã. (2021). Political emotions and digital political mobilization in the new populist parties: the cases of Podemos and Vox in Spain. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 246-267.
Chae, J. (2015). "Am I a better mother than you?" Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of the social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503-525.
Eichengreen, B. (2018). The populist temptation: Economic grievance and political reaction in the modern era. Oxford University Press.
Hirsch, A., & Levy, B. (2018). Elaborate scaffolding, weak foundations: Business-government relations and economic reform in democratic South Africa.
Jønch-Clausen, K., & Kappel, K. (2015). Social epistemic liberalism and the problem of deep epistemic disagreements. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18, 371-384.
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022). Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560-576.
Levin, S. A., Milner, H. V., & Perrings, C. (2021). The dynamics of political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), e2116950118.
Mashau, T. D. (2018). Unshackling the chains of coloniality: Reimagining decoloniality, Africanization and Reformation for a non-racial South Africa. HTS: Theological Studies, 74(3), 1-8.
Ncube, M., Shimeles, A., &Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2013). South Africa's quest for inclusive development.
Phoenix, D. L. (2019). The anger gap: How race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.
Silva, J. A., Matyas, C. J., & Cunguara, B. (2015). Regional inequality and polarization in the context of concurrent extreme weather and economic shocks. Applied Geography, 61, 105-116.
Southall, R. (2016). The new black middle class in South Africa. Boydell & Brewer.
Southall, R. (2019). Polarization in South Africa: toward democratic deepening or democratic decay?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 194-208.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). Social comparison in identity theory. Communal functions of social comparison, 39-59.
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Springer Science & Business Media.
Talisse, R. B. (2013). A pragmatist philosophy of democracy. Routledge.
Talisse, R. B. (2015). Value pluralism: A philosophical clarification. Administration & Society, 47(9), 1064-1076.
Venter, Z. S., Shackleton, C. M., Van Staden, F., Selomane, O., & Masterson, V. A. (2020). Green Apartheid: Urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103889.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nelson Madjozi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
