Role of Mediation in Territorial Disputes in East Asia

Authors

  • Wei Cheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/jcm.2627

Keywords:

Mediation, Territorial, Disputes

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the role of mediation in territorial disputes in East Asia.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: In East Asia, mediation plays a pivotal role in addressing territorial disputes by fostering diplomatic dialogue and negotiation. It aims to de-escalate tensions and find mutually acceptable solutions, preventing conflicts from worsening. Despite challenges like historical animosities and power imbalances, mediation remains a crucial tool for managing territorial disputes in the region.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Structural realism, constructivism & regional institutionalist theory may be used to anchor future studies on mediation in territorial disputes in East Asia. Mediation offers a constructive mechanism for de-escalating tensions and facilitating dialogue between disputing parties. Promoting mediation as a preferred method for resolving territorial disputes in East Asia can enhance regional peacebuilding efforts and promote a rules-based international order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, A. (2021). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order (3rd ed.). Routledge.

African Union. (2019). African Union Annual Report. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731670.013.5

ASEAN. (2020). ASEAN Regional Forum. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean/asean-regional-forum-arf/

ASEAN. (2021). Association of Southeast Asian Nations Annual Report. Retrieved from https://asean.org/

AU PSC. (2021). African Union Peace and Security Council Annual Report. Retrieved from https://au.int/en/psc

Bercovitch, J., & Jackson, R. D. (2009). Conflict resolution in the twenty-first century: Principles, methods, and approaches. University of Michigan Press.

CARICOM. (2021). Caribbean Community Annual Report. Retrieved from https://caricom.org/

Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). The role of mediation in territorial disputes: A case study of the East China Sea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 19(2), 123-145.

Chen, X. (2021). Mediation and international territorial disputes: Assessing the case of the South China Sea. Cambridge University Press.

Dixon, W. J. (2012). Territorial disputes and their resolution: The case of Ecuador and Peru. Routledge.

ECJ. (2020). European Court of Justice Annual Report. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_16533/en/

ECOWAS. (2020). Economic Community of West African States Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.ecowas.int/

ECOWAS. (2021). Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Retrieved from https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-agencies/peace-and-security/

ECOWAS. (2021). Economic Community of West African States Annual Report. Retrieved from

EEAS. (2018). Western Balkans Strategy. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/western_balkans_strategy_-_a credible enlargement perspective_en_0.pdf

GCC. (2020). Gulf Cooperation Council Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.gcc-sg.org/en-us/Pages/default.aspx

Huang, Y., & Oatley, T. (2018). Power transition, threat perception, and the security dilemma: China's rise and East Asian security. Security Studies, 27(2), 246-275.

IBC. (2021). International Boundary Commission Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/

ICJ. (2021). International Court of Justice Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/annual-reports

IGAD. (2020). Intergovernmental Authority on Development Annual Report. Retrieved from

Johnston, A. I., & Ma, Y. (2020). Strategies for mediating maritime territorial disputes: Learning from the South China Sea. Brookings Institution Press.

Jones, D. M. (2018). The mediation handbook: Research, theory, and practice. Routledge.

Kim, J., & Moon, H. (2019). Third-party mediation in territorial disputes: Comparative case studies from East Asia. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 37(3), 263-281.

Kim, S. (2022). China and East Asian security: A changing regional dynamic. Routledge.

Li, M., & Zhao, H. (2018). Mediation strategies in the South China Sea disputes: A qualitative content analysis. Asian Security, 14(2), 145-167.

Mares, D. R. (2017). The Role of the Organization of American States in Resolving Territorial Conflicts in Latin America. DOI: 10.1017/qua.2017.66

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA). (2020). Japan's Efforts for Peace and Stability in the International Community. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/2020/html/chapter3/c030101.html

OAS. (2020). Organization of American States Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.oas.org/en/about/annualreport.asp

OCHA. (2021). United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.unocha.org/annualreport

Park, C. (2019). The South China Sea dispute: Navigating diplomatic and strategic tensions. Palgrave Macmillan.

Park, S., & Lee, J. (2017). Track-two diplomacy in mediating territorial disputes: Insights from East Asia. International Negotiation, 22(3), 396-418.

PIF. (2020). Pacific Islands Forum Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.forumsec.org/

SADC. (2020). Southern African Development Community Annual Report.

Suzuki, S. (2016). Multilateral mediation mechanisms in East Asia: A comparative analysis. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 4(2), 217-239.

U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). Conflict and Stabilization: Territorial Disputes. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/conflict-and-stabilization-territorial-disputes/

UN. (2020). United Nations Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/annualreport/

Wagner, A. J. (2016). Third party dispute resolution in an intergovernmental context: The case of the United Nations. Negotiation Journal, 32(1), 61-85.

Waltz, K. (2018). Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press.

Wang, J., & Lin, C. (2023). The role of third-party mediation in territorial disputes in East Asia. Asian Perspective, 47(2), 261-281.

Wendt, A. (2018). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Wu, X., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Non-traditional mediators in territorial disputes: A qualitative study of grassroots initiatives in East Asia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(4), 784-806.

Yang, W., & Liu, Y. (2018). International mediation in East Asian territorial disputes: A cross-national analysis. Security Studies, 27(3), 498-521.

Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Mediation in Territorial Disputes: Opportunities and Challenges. East Asia Policy Review, 14(2), 45-62.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Cheng, W. (2024). Role of Mediation in Territorial Disputes in East Asia. Journal of Conflict Management, 4(3), 1 – 13. https://doi.org/10.47604/jcm.2627

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Wei Cheng

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.