AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRACTICE OF RESULTS-BASED MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: THE CASE OF KENYA

Authors

  • Prof. David. M Minja Kenyatta University

Keywords:

Resource Based Management, Public Sector, Managerial/Leadership Styles, Challenges and Strategies

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the study was to assess the practice of resource based management in the public sector, a case of Kenya.

Methodology: The research adopted an exploratory-survey design.

Findings: Results revealed that leaders in public service adopted directive style of management. Results also found that majority of the employees are disempowered by management and to say the least, they are mentally disengaged from the organization. The survey identified ten most common practices seen to be inhibiting the practice of result based management which included organization culture, management paralysis, accountability practice, leader's insatiable desire to take all credit, failure to confront underperforming members of the management team, organizational politics, boss barrier syndrome, indecisiveness and fear of failure by managers, resistance to change and organizational structures and systems and developmental level of employees. Further, results revealed that the strategies for promoting result based management included leadership development for the top management, valuing employees, creation of cultural capital, removing empowerment barriers, promoting accountability, developing high performance teams and participative management.

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This research looks at RBM in public sector which has become a key area of focus in the twenty- first century public management practice. It has looked at the causes of failure to practice RBM in public sector and proposed several strategies to remedy the situation. If successfully adopted, RBM practice will avoid creation of busy but ineffective public sector organizations. There are several ways to address this phenomenon and managers should adopt strategies that best suit their organizational situation and context. In order for an organization to survive and achieve success, it must have a sound set of beliefs on which it premises all its policies and actions. Beliefs must always come before policies, practices and goals. Faithfully adhering to those beliefs is critical to successful leadership and management practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Prof. David. M Minja, Kenyatta University

Associate Professor of Management

References

Alagse (2014). Article. Retrieved on February, 18 WWW.Alagse .com.

Auditor General Report (2002). Canada Auditor General Report. December

Batley, R. (1999). An Overview of Findings, Paper No. 2, workshop on The Changing Role of Government in Adjusting Economies, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, 28.30 March.

Caiden, G. (1991). Administrative Reform Comes of Age. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Coats, D. & Passmore, E. (2008). Public Value: The Next Steps in Public Service Reform. The Work Foundation, London.

Day, P. & Klein, R. (1987). Accountabilities: Five Public Services. Tavistock Publications, London,

DeLeon, L. (1997). Administrative Reform and Democratic Accountability. In Kickert.

Kay, J. (2003). The truths About Markets: Why Some Countries are Rich and Others Remain Poor. London, Allen Lane.

Kotter, J. & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. The free Press. New York.

Mkandawire, T. & Soludo, C. C. (1999). Our Continent, Our Future: African Perspectives on Structural Adjustment. Africa World Press, Trenton.

Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Myers, R. & Lacey, R. (1996).Consumer satisfaction, performance and accountability. International Review of Administrative Sciences 62, 331.350.

Ole Therkildsen, B. (2001). Efficiency, Accountability and Implementation. Public Sector Reform in East and Southern Africa. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development

Olowu, B. (1999). Redesigning African civil service reforms. Journal of Modern African Studies 37(1), 1-23.

Olowu, B. (1998). Strategies for Improving Efficiency in the Democratizing States of Africa. International Review of Administrative Science 64.

Ortiz, F.E., et al. (2004). Managing for Results in the UN System. UN Publication, Geneva.

Philips, A. (2014). Good Management. Ignite Newsletter. Ken Blanchard Group of Companies.

Republic of South Africa, Department of Public Service and Administration. (2005). Development of Interventions to Position the HR Function in the Public Service.

Wright, V. (1997). The paradoxes of administrative reforms. In Kickert.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-29

How to Cite

Minja, P. D. M. (2016). AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRACTICE OF RESULTS-BASED MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: THE CASE OF KENYA. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 1(1), 84–94. Retrieved from https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JHRL/article/view/198

Issue

Section

Articles