Managers’ Toxic Masculinity Erodes Employees’ Work Ethics in Private Institutions of DRC’s City of Bukavu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jhrl.2978Keywords:
Toxic Masculinity, Erodes, Employees, Work Ethics, DRC-Bukavu, Private InstitutionsAbstract
Purpose: This research has explored views of employees in Bukavu (DRC) private institutions regarding ways managers’ toxic masculinity damages employers’ work ethics at workplace.
Methodology: Researchers conducted this qualitative study in the city of Bukavu between April and June 2024 with randomly selected 25 respondents from five private institutions. Respondents were Congolese females and males whose ages varied between 19 and 63. Data was collected via face-to-face focus group discussions, with in-depth interviews. The theories of masculinity and control guided the research. Masculinity posits that managers must exert power and control over their employees at workplace. Managers resorting to toxic masculinity damage the ethics of their workers, which can affect productivity.
Findings: Results reveal how a manager may use toxic masculinity to deride the workers, which kills their appreciation and motivation for work. Managers applying domination, homophobia, giving poor and unfair salaries, abusing employees and discriminating against them are perpetuating toxic masculinity in their institutions. These factors are demotivating and destructive agents for employees’ ethics at work because they convey toxic masculinity through power and control, all causing work unproductivity.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The research suggests that employers should develop progressive masculinity at work by valuing and respecting the workers. The perspective can boost collaboration; sustain commitment and harmony at work. Socializing constructive manliness can create a conducive work environment in private institutions of Bukavu, increase workers’ commitment to work, as well as the production.
Downloads
References
Agius, C. (2022). This is not who we are: gendered bordering practices, ontological insecurity, and lines of continuity under the Trump presidency. Review International Studies 48(2):385–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000590
Agius, C., et al. (2020). Mapping right-wing extremism in Victoria. Applying a gender lens to develop prevention and deradicalisation approaches. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Justice and Community Safety: Countering Violent Extremism Unit and Swinburne University of Technology
Allan, J.A. (2016). Phallic affect, or why men’s rights activists have feelings. Men Masculinities 19(1):22–41
Askey, B. (2018). I’d Rather Have No Brains and Two Balls: Eunuchs, Masculinity, and Power in Game of Thrones.” The Journal of Popular Culture 51 (1), 50–67.
Audickas, L., Dempsey, N. and Keen, R. (2018). Membership of UK Political Parties. House of Commons Library: Briefing Paper No. SN05125, 3 September.
Bale, T., Poletti, M. and Webb, P. (2018). A man’s game? The grassroots gender gap in Britain’s political parties. Political Insight 9(2): 7–10.
Banet-Weiser, S. and Portwood-Stacer, L. (2017). “The Traffic in Feminism: An Introduction to the Commentary and Criticism on Popular Feminism.” Feminist Media Studies 17 (5), 884–888.
Birdsall, N. and Keay, S. (2018). Love Island and other reality TV shows are helping to normalise domestic abuse, The Conversation, 23 July. Available at: https://theconversation.com/love-island-and-other-reality-tv-shows-are-helping-to-normalise-domestic-abuse-100268 (accessed 29 June, 2024).
Childs, S., and Hughes, M. (2018). ‘Which men? How an intersectional perspective on men and masculinities helps explain women’s political underrepresentation. Politics & Gender 14(2): 283–287.
Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Coumarelos, C. et al. (2023). Attitudes matter: the 2021 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS), Findings for young Australians (Research report, 08/2023). ANROWS. doi:10.1080/00918369.2019.1661728
Ekşi, B. (2017). “The Myth of the Tough Men’s Burden: Reproducing a Hegemonic Masculinity at the Turkish National Police.” NORMA 12 (1), 5–22.
Gill, R. (2016). “Post-postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (4), 610–630.
Gough, B. et al. (2016). Men, ‘masculinity’ and mental health: critical reflections. In J. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook on Gender and Health. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.4337/9781784710866
Kimmel, M. and Wade, L. (2018). Ask a Feminist: Michael Kimmel and Lisa Wade Discuss Toxic Masculinity. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(1), 233-254.
Konopka, K. et al. (2019). The Role of Masculinity Threat inHomonegativity and Transphobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 1(28).
McGinley, A. C. (2018). “The Masculinity Motivation.” Stanford Law Review Online 71, 49–59.
Mugisho N. and Umumararungu, K. (2024). Exploring the nexus of oral communication, masculinity, and gender based violence in Congolese households: a qualitative study. Research in Business & Social Science;13 (3): 2147-4478. https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs.
Mugisho, N. & Muthuki, J. (December 2022). The Interconnections between Armed Conflict, Gender-Based Violence and Congolese Masculinities. In Gender & Behaviour Journal, 20 (4): 20839-20857;ISSN (1596-9231).
Mugisho, N.&Umumararungu, C. (2023). Gender-based violence as the outcome of maleness and egotism among Congolese male migrants located in the South African City of Durban. In International Journal of Research in Business and Social Sciences;12 (5): 331-341. Accessed on October 23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2698
Mugisho, N. (2022). Experiences of Gender-Based Violence in a Transnational Context: A Case Study of Congolese Male Refugees Living in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, UKZN, South Africa.
Mugisho, N. & Muthuki, J. (2023). The Interconnections between Witchcraft Accusations, Hegemonic Masculinities, and Gender-Based Violence amongst Congolese Male Refugees in Durban, South Africa. The Journal of Gender & Behaviour: 23 (16): 13-26.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine NASEM (2018). Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994
Pettyjohn M. et al. (2019). “#HowIWillChange: Engaging Men and Boys in the #MeToo Movement—ProQuest.” Psychology of Men & Masculinities 20 (4), 612–622.
Sculos, B. (2017). Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’? Class, Race and Corporate Power 5 (3).
Waling, A. (2019). “Problematising ‘Toxic’ and ‘Healthy’ Masculinity for Addressing Gender Inequalities.” Australian Feminist Studies 34 (101), 362–375.
Wood, J. T. (2019). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, & culture (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Wood, J. T. (2020). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, & culture (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Yoshimura, C. G., & Hayden, S. E. (2017). The effects of gender on communication and workplace relations. In O’Lynn, C.E., &Tranbarger, R. E. (Eds.). Men in nursing: History, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 103-120). Springer Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ndabuli Mugisho (PhD), Christine Kapita Umumararungu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
