Humanitarian Intervention and Sovereignty: A Normative Conflict in Canada

Authors

  • Benjamin Wilson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.3188

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the humanitarian intervention and sovereignty: a normative conflict in Canada.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Canada’s approach to humanitarian intervention and sovereignty is shaped by the tension between traditional non-intervention norms and the imperative to prevent mass atrocities. This normative conflict came to the fore when Canada played a pivotal role in framing the “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) concept through the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, essentially recasting sovereignty as a duty to protect citizens rather than a shield against external scrutiny. While many Canadians support humanitarian intervention on moral grounds demonstrated through involvement express concern about the selectivity and potential abuse of humanitarian justifications, echoing broader global fears over infringing on state sovereignty.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Realism, Liberalism & Constructivism theory may be used to anchor future studies on humanitarian intervention and sovereignty: a normative conflict in Canada. Regional organizations should be empowered to take the lead in addressing humanitarian crises within their respective territories, with the support of the international community, to foster legitimacy and respect for sovereignty. Policymakers should work to revise and strengthen international legal frameworks to reflect the evolving dynamics of sovereignty and humanitarian intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amadi, P., & Moyo, N. (2022). Sovereignty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities in the face of foreign influence. Journal of African Studies, 59(4), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jas.12345

Banda, R., & Tafirenyika, R. (2022). Sovereignty and economic dependencies in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Ghana and Zambia. African Economic Review, 51(2), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/aer.12305

Bellamy, A. J. (2021). Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., & Higgott, R. (2021). NATO, sovereignty, and humanitarian intervention: The case of Kosovo. Global Security, 38(4), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1791236

Finnemore, M. (2020). The humanitarian intervention debate: Sovereignty, international law, and the ethical dilemma. Global Politics, 18(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1557233X.2020.1712145

Gowan, R. (2020). Humanitarian intervention in the Syrian Civil War: A critical review of the role of the international community. International Relations Journal, 26(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/irj/irz007

Holmes, R., & Richards, D. (2021). Managing state sovereignty in the globalized world: The Canadian and Australian experience. Global Affairs Review, 46(3), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752424.2021.1876346

Kaya, F. (2020). Humanitarian intervention and sovereignty: A study of Syria. Global Politics, 45(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.globalpol.2020.05.003

Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Sovereignty in the face of globalization: Case studies from developing economies. International Affairs Review, 48(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/iar/ivab034

Morris, E. (2018). Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty in international law. International Law Review, 27(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15383628.2018.1448786

Patel, S., & Kumar, V. (2020). India's foreign policy and humanitarian intervention: Sovereignty concerns in South Asia. Asian Affairs, 51(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1711236

Patel, S., Kumar, V., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Sovereignty and global integration: The case of developing economies. International Political Economy Review, 46(2), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipe.2021.04.003

Schmidt, C., & Boulton, M. (2020). The evolving concept of state sovereignty in developed economies: A European perspective. European Politics and Society Journal, 31(2), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460867.2020.1819087

Thindwa, G. (2022). Humanitarian intervention and sovereignty: African perspectives. African Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1353/asq.2022.0023

World Bank. (2023). World development indicators. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/

Zhang, J., & Lee, K. (2021). The UN and humanitarian intervention: The challenge of sovereignty in decision-making. Journal of International Law, 42(4), 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jil/jgaa042

Zhang, J., Lee, K., & Wang, X. (2020). Economic interdependence and state sovereignty in developed economies: A comparative analysis. Global Governance, 26(3), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1163/19423166-12340016

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

Wilson, B. (2025). Humanitarian Intervention and Sovereignty: A Normative Conflict in Canada. Journal of International Relations, 4(5), 23 – 35. https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.3188

Issue

Section

Articles