E-Governance and Service Delivery by Rwanda National Public Service Commission

Authors

  • Uwingeneye Gertrude Mount Kenya University
  • Malgit Amos Akims, PhD Mount Kigali University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/jppa.3010

Keywords:

E-governance, E-administration, E-participation, Service Delivery

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the effect of E-governance and service delivery by Rwanda National Public Service Commission. The specific objectives of this study included, determining the effect of E-administration on service delivery by Rwanda National Public Service Commission and determining the effect of E-participation on service delivery by Rwanda National Public Service Commission. The three theories that provided the basis of this research are the following: Stakeholders Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory.  Chose these ideas because of what they have to say about how services are provided in a tech-driven setting. In order to accomplish these goals, an analysis of relevant literature was conducted.

Methodology: Data were gathered from 47 randomly selected workers of the Rwanda National Public Service Commission using a census sample approach. Data was gathered using a combination of questionnaires and document analysis. As part of the study, SPSS 25 was used.

Findings: The Rwanda National Public Service Commission found a high level of correlation (R = 0.844) between the predictors of service delivery and administration, and participation. With an R-squared value of 0.712, these variables account for around 71.2% of the variance in service delivery. Their unstandardized coefficients emphasize the impact of each predictor on service delivery. With a coefficient E-administration also has a notable positive effect, with a coefficient of (β = 0.404, t = 4.646, and p-value = 0.000). Similarly, E-participation contributes positively, with a coefficient of (β = 0.505, t = 5.973, and p-value = 0.000). All coefficients are statistically significant, underscoring their crucial roles in enhancing service delivery, as indicated by their p-values being below the conventional threshold of 0.05.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that Rwanda National Public Service Commission should enhance the user interface and accessibility of online platforms, expand online services while integrating with other government systems, and improve cybersecurity protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does e-government impact e-participation? The influence of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 27, 1-20.

Ackah, M., Nunoo-Mensah, J., & Yiadom, A. (2023). E-government and transparency in Ghana: The role of the Right to Information online portal and the Integrated Tax and Customs Management System (ICUMS). International Journal of Public Administration, 46(7), 521-534.

Adnan, M., Ghazali, M., & Othman, N. Z. S. (2022). e-Participation within the Context of e-Government Initiatives: A comprehensive systematic review. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, 100015.

Akmentina, L. (2022). E-participation and engagement in urban planning: Experiences from the Baltic cities. Urban Research & Practice, 1–34.

Alqudah, M. A., & Muradkhanli, L. (2021). Electronic management and its role in developing the performance of e-government in Jordan. Electronic Research Journal of Engineering, Computer and Applied Sciences, 3, 65-82.

Baloi, D., & Mentz, J. (2023). Analysing the South African e-government legal framework: A focus on inclusivity and citizen participation. South African Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 1-10.

Banga, K., Rodriguez, A., & Velde, D. (2020). Digitally enabled economic transformation and.

Erdogan, B., & Tatoglu, E. (2022). E-government service quality in Turkey: A perspective from citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101533.

Freeman, R., Dmytriyev, S., & Phillips, R. (2021). Stakeholder Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770.

Gordon, J. (2023). Stakeholder Theory of Corporate Governance - Explained - What Does it Mean for Officer and Director Decision Making?

Hengyun, L., Fang, M., & Bing, P. (2020). How does review disconfirmation influence customer online review behavior? A mixed-method investigation.

Johnson, C. (2020). E-Governance and Public Service Efficiency in Europe. European Journal of Public Administration, 28(1), 54-77.

Kelly, A., & Palaniappan, S. (2023). Using a technology acceptance model to determine factors influencing continued usage of mobile money service transactions in Ghana. J Innov Entrep 12, 34.

Lee, B. (2021). Trust and E-Governance in Enhancing Public Service Delivery. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(2), 112-130.

Lefevre, C., & Tremblay, L. (2023). User Experience and Interoperability Challenges in French E-Government. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 382-394.

Lefevre, C., & Tremblay, L. (2023). User Experience and Interoperability Challenges in French E-Government. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 382-394.

Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2023). How does e-government use affect citizens’ trust in government? Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management. 60(7), 103844.

Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2023). Technology Acceptance Model: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book.

Mbaidin, H., Alomari, K. M., & Al Jbour, R. S. (2021). The impact of e-services quality on citizens' satisfaction: An applied study at Al Ain Municipality, UAE. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(5S), 123-135.

Mertes, A., Fischer, D., Brüesch, C., & Andermatt, K. C. (2022). The perceived advantages of e-participation and its impact on citizens’ willingness to engage: findings from the Canton of Zurich. Swiss Yearbook of Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 131-148.

Moon, M., Park, J., & Kim, Y. (2023). E-government 2.0 revisited: The rise of citizen participation and open data. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101601.

Muller, R. (2023). Shareholder and stakeholder theory in governance.

Mulyana, Y., & Jamaludin, M. (2023). Effects of government electronic service quality on citizen satisfaction with integrated service delivery in urban areas. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 10(1), 24-33.

NCST. (2023). National Council for Science and Technology, Rwanda. Fostering Innovation to Solve Key National Social and Development Problems. Quarterly Newsletter.

NEC. (2020). Africa as the Next Frontier for eGovernment. Nippon Electric Company. Available at.

Nyorekwa, T., Munu, L., & Zjos, M. (2022). Digital divides or dividends? Assessing the inclusiveness of basic services in Rwanda’s digitalisation agenda.

Omosa, L., Wafula, G., & Okoth, A. (2022). E-government service delivery in Kenya: The case of Huduma Centers and eCitizen. International Journal of E-Government Research, 18(4), 1-18.

Pham, L., Limbu, Y., Thu, M., & Nguyen, N. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: evidence from a newly emerging country.

Ramachandran, R. (2020). Theories of Stakeholder Management.

Republic of Rwanda. (2022). Rwanda ICT sector profile 2022. Republic of Rwanda, Ministry of ICT and Innovation, Kigali.

Riany, K. G. (2021). Influence of Electronic Administration on Public Service Delivery among State Agencies in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 39–43.

Sepasgozar, F. M., Ramzani, U., Ebrahimzadeh, S., Sargolzae, S., & Sepasgozar, S. (2020). Technology acceptance in e-governance: A case of a finance organization, Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

Smith, A. (2022). Digital Governance and Service Delivery Improvements in Developing Nations. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 14(3), 45-67.

Tan, C., & Weill, P. (2023). Singapore's e-government journey: Lessons for citizen-centric service delivery. MIS Quarterly Executive, 22(2), 121-132.

Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F., Tejada, Á., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. echnology in Society.

The World Bank Group. (2020). Rwanda Economic Update: Accelerating Digital Transformation in Rwanda.

The World Bank. (2020). Rwanda Digital Acceleration Project (P173373).

Twum-Darko, M., Ncede, N., & Tengeh, R. (2023). Stakeholder engagement: A service delivery-based strategy formulation process in the public sector of South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478).

Uwizeyimana, D. (2022). Analysing the importance of e-government in times of disruption: The case of public education in Rwanda during Covid-19 lockdown. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91, 102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102064.

Vanger, E. T., & Atsunkare, N. (2021). E-administration and administrative efficiency of the Taraba State Civil Service. Sapientia Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Development Studies (SGOJAHDS), 4(2), 438–449. ISSN: 2695-2319 (Print); 2695-2327 (Online).

Wang, E. (2021). Citizen-Centric E-Governance in Asia: Enhancing Public Services. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 32(2), 89-107.

World Economic Forum. (2023). Rwanda digital transformation: Charting the future of global data access.

Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. (2021). The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice.

Zwane, Z., & Matsiliza, N. (2022). Stakeholders’ involvement in service delivery at eDumbe Municipality, Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation 3(0), a45.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-21

How to Cite

Uwingeneye, G., & Akims, M. (2024). E-Governance and Service Delivery by Rwanda National Public Service Commission. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 9(3), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.47604/jppa.3010

Issue

Section

Articles