Farmers' Demonstrate Rationality and Transitivity in Variety Choice: Empirical Evidence From two Rice Growing Niches in Coastal Kenya.

Authors

  • Kengo Danda M Agricultural Economist with the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization
  • John M. Kimani Rice Breeder with the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization
  • Lee Sang-Bok Korea-Africa Food and Agriculture Cooperation Initiative (KAFACI), Africa Rice Training Center, Saint-Louis, Senegal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ija.1464

Keywords:

Rice Varieties, Farmers, Producer, Consumer, Choice, Rationality, Seed, Transitivity and Utility

Abstract

Purpose: A cross-sectional survey was designed to study farmers' preference and choice framework for rice varieties in Kwale and Taita-Taveta counties of coastal lowland Kenya.

Methodology: The survey used a multi-stage sampling technique; systematic selection for the study counties/niches, a purposive sampling approach for the study population (rice growers only) and a systematic random sampling for the respondents on an nth occurrence. Data was collected with the aid of a semi-structured questionnaire and key informant interviews from key rice value chain actors; including farmers as producers as well as consumers and agricultural extension service providers (AESPs) and other stakeholders. A total of 137 individual respondents were interviewed using the semi-structured questionnaire while the key informant interviews engaged a total of 29 AESPs. Data analysis focused on exploring on the varieties that farmers grew and whether they had a criteria or pattern for choosing the varieties to grow and seed source.

Findings: Results confirmed that the Kwale rice growing niche had a higher rice variety diversity (more than 12 varieties) while Taita-Taveta had only around seven (7) common varieties. Rice was more traditionally grown in Kwale with low acreage and low yields compared to Taita-Taveta. Common varieties grown were Pachanga, Supa, Kitumbo, Makonde and Kibawa in Kwale while in Taita-Taveta, Japan, Supa and Hybrid 6444 rice varieties were common (with prevalence rating of 44.8%, 25.4%, 22.4%, 20.9 and 17.9% in Kwale respectively and 55.7%, 54.3% and 18.6% in Taita-Taveta respectively). Varieties grown by farmers in Kwale had a long history of seed recycling and were characterized by low productivity (less than 6, 90-kg bags per acre) and subsistent in nature than in Taita-Taveta. The general picture for variety prevalence in both (Kwale and Taita) growing niches was that farmers mostly relied on traditional (own-preserved, farmer-to-farmer exchange or market) seed systems for the recycled rice varieties.  Variety choice by farmers who are both producers and consumers demonstrated a rational and transitive behavior with land resource allocation.

Contribution to theory, practice and policy:  The study provided evidence of an urgent need for strategic interventions towards improving the production system through on-farm researcher-led demonstrations for superior rice varieties, agronomic practices as well as an input subsidy and sustainable market linkages. Formation of farmer producer groups and strategic facilitation of the groups with rice certified seed and mills are proposed as positive drivers to improving rice marketing and increased productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atera, E. A., Onyancha, F. N. and Majiwa, E. B. O. (2018): Production and marketing of rice in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities; In the Journal of Development and Agricultural economics; Vol. 10(3), pp. 64-70, March 2018

Dwicahyani, A. R., Cucuk Nur Rosyidi, C. N. and Pujiyanto, E. (2019): Minimizing gap of utility between consumer and producer in a duopoly market considering outsourcing decision, price, and product tolerance; A production & manufacturing research article: 2019, VOL. 7, NO. 1, 23-43: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2019.1571957

Ghimire, J., Wen-chi, H., Shrestha, R. B. (2015): Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal. In Science Direct; Rice Science, 2015, 22(1): 35−43

Grundmann, S. and Hacker, P. (2021): Theories of choice: the social science and the law of decision making; ISBN-13: 9780198863175

Huffman, W. E. (2010: Household production theory and models; Working Paper No. 10019, June 2010. Iowa State University, Department of Economics; Ames, iowa, 50011-1070

Jeffrey P. Walters, J. P., Archerb, D. W., Sassenrathc, G. F., Hendricksond, J. R., Hansond, J. D., Hallorane, J. M., Vadasf, P. and Alarcona, V. J. (2016): Exploring agricultural production systems and their fundamental components with system dynamics modelling. In Elsebier journal of ecological modelling 333 (2016) 51-65

Kega, V. M., Gikonyo, E. W., Muriithi, C. W., Macharia, J. M. K. and Muthoni, L. (2015): Rice cultivation manual. KALRO, November 2015 ISBN No. 978-9966-30-035-5

Kimani J. M., Tongoona P., Derera J, and Nyende A.B. 2011. Upland Rice Varieties Development Through Participatory Plant Breeding. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 6 (9): 39-49. ISSN1990-6145

Kimani, J.M. 2010. Genetic studies of Quantitative Quality Traits in Rice Under Low and High soil nitrogen and phosphorous Conditions, and a Survey of Farmer Preferences for Varieties. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Plant Breeding. African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribusiness, Faculty of Science and Agriculture.

Lanas, J. G., Gardenas, J. C., Jarrin, V. A. and Fierro, A. P. (2020): Empirical evidence for intransitivity in consumer preferences. Review article

Mesfin, A. H. and Zemedu, M. (2018): Choices of Varieties and Demand for Improved Rice Seed in Fogera District of Ethiopia; In Science Direct; Rice Science, 2018, 25(6): 350-356

Musila, R. N., Sibiya, J., Derera, J., Kimani, J. M., Tongoona, P. and Danda K. (2018): Farmers' perceptions of, and preferred traits in, rice varieties in the coastal region of Kenya and their implications for breeding. In the journal of International Cooperation for Agricultural Development; J Intl Cooper Agric Dev 2018; 16: 1-11

MoA, (2008): National Rice Development Strategy; Government of Kenya

Rapsomanikis, G. 2015: The economic lives of smallholder farmers: An analysis based on household data from nine countries. (FAO, Rome)

Regenwetter, M., Dana, J. and Clintin P. (2011): Transitivity of preference; Psychological Review 2011; In the American Psychological Association 2011, Vol. 118, No. 1, 42-56

Rout, N. R. and Senapati, R. (2005): Population Movement and Changing Consumer Behavior: A Study of Balasore District in India

Thomas, L. (2020): Cross-Sectional Study | Definitions, Uses & Examples; Published on May 8, 2020

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Kengo, M., Kimani, J., & Sang-Bok, L. (2021). Farmers’ Demonstrate Rationality and Transitivity in Variety Choice: Empirical Evidence From two Rice Growing Niches in Coastal Kenya. International Journal of Agriculture, 6(1), 46 – 55. https://doi.org/10.47604/ija.1464

Issue

Section

Articles