An Evaluation of Stakeholder Involvement in the Development of Communication Plans Used in the Diffusion of Improved Maize Varieties among Farmers in the Semi-Arid Lower Eastern Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.3037Keywords:
Participatory Communication, Stakeholder Involvement, Development, Communication Plans, Improved Maize VarietiesAbstract
Purpose: While it is acknowledged that increased adoption of agricultural innovations is today hinged on increased and proper application of participatory communication approaches, the adoption of improved maize varieties in the semi-arid Lower Eastern Kenya has remained low at less than 30 percent despite the application of the approach. Proper application of the approach requires adequate involvement of stakeholders in communication activities that include the assessment of the communication needs and the formulation of the communication strategies at all stages of the development and diffusion of an innovation. The purpose of this study was therefore, to assess the level of stakeholder involvement in the development of communication plans used in the diffusion of improved maize varieties among farmers in the semi- arid region of Lower Eastern Kenya
Methodology: Qualitative data was collected from farmers, agricultural scientists, agricultural extension officers and documents. It was analysed using a thematic analysis method in accordance with apriori themes and sub-themes developed by the researcher from the literature, principles of participatory communication approaches and the concerns of the research questions.
Findings: The study revealed a critical gap in stakeholder involvement during the development of the communication plans which could hinder the formulation of an effective communication strategy.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: In order to improve the adoption rates of improved maize varieties in the semi-arid Lower Eastern Kenya, stakeholders should adequately be involved in the development of communication plans to enable them to uncover their information deficits and identify their existing communication networks necessary for sustained adoption of the maize seeds. This involvement facilitates free and open dialogue which leads to conscientization in which individuals and communities develop a critical understanding of their social reality through reflection and action; ownership where participants accept the initiative and become active participants and; praxis (practice) in which the imitative is fully accepted and used.
Downloads
References
Ali, A. C., & Sonderling, S. (2017). Factors affecting participatory communication for development: the case of a local development organization in Ethiopia. Journal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), 80-97.
Anyaegbunam, C., Mefalopulos, P., & Moetsabi, T. (2004). Participatory Rural Communication Appraisal Starting with the People: A Handbook. Food & Agriculture Org.
Bessette G. (2020), Participatory Development Communication and Natural Resources Management. Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, 2020 ISBN: 978-981-15-2013-6
Balit, S. (2007). Communication for isolated and marginalized groups. Communication And Sustainable Development, 101.
Bessette G. (2004). Involving the Community: A Guide to Participatory Development Communication. Ottawa: IDRC Books.
del Mar Ramis, M., Gandia, V., Bellot-Arcís, C., Cibrian, R., Peredes-Gallardo, V., & Gandia, J. L. (2018). Evaluation of Invisalign treatment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. Evaluation, 2(1), 13-19.
Freire, Paulo., (2006). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th Anniversary Ed. New York: Continuum
Kamau G. (2007). Researching with Farmers: A study of KARI participatory research practices in context, PhD Thesis, Wageningen University
Lundy, M. M., Gottret, M. V., & Ashby, J. A. (2005). Learning alliances: An approach for building multistakeholder innovation systems. ILAC Brief.
Maharani Dita Novita. 2002. An Evaluation of the Participatory Communication Approach for the Development of the Kotagede Area: A Case Study of the Rekompak-JRF Heritage Extension Programme in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Ateneo de Manila UniversityManila University.
Mefalopulos P., 2003 Theory and Practice of Participatory Communication: The case of the FAO Project “Communication for Development in Southern Africa” PhD Dissertation, University of Texas,
Melkote, S. and Steeves, H. Leslie., 2001. Communication for Development in the Third World: Theory and Practice for Empowerment (2nded.). New Delhi: Sage.
Mozammel and Schechter.,2005. Communication for Development and Social Change, Sage Publication.
Naidoo, L,.2010. The Participatory Development Communication Approach of Thusong Service Centres in Tshwane. M.A. Thesis, Northwest University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Ngumbo, L. N. (2015). Participatory communication in Poverty Reduction in Kenya: A study of Murang’a County (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Rizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G. et al. Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Org. Agr. 14, 57–84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2014). The role and place of Communication for Sustainable Social Change (CSSC). International Social Science Journal, 65.
Tufte, T. & Mefatopulos, P, (2009. Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide, World Bank Working Paper No. 170. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Emily Keles Muli, Prof. Maurice Sakwa, PhD, Dr. Masaya H. Chakava, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
