Equity Financing and Firm Value; Short Run and Long Run Dynamics: A Generalized Method of Moments Approach

Authors

  • Dr. Aloys Jared Oganda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.1942

Keywords:

Equity Financing, Firm Value, Manufacturing firms

Abstract

The Kenyan manufacturing sector's contribution to the economy has been declining. It has stagnated at 10% of the gross domestic product (GDP), contributing to an average of 10% from 1964-1973 and marginally increased to 13.6% from 1990-2007 and has been below 10% in recent years further dropping to 8.4% in 2017 and 7.1% in 2020 ultimately hitting its lowest in 2022 of 7.2%. The government has renewed its efforts to revive the sector to grow its contribution to GDP to 20% by 2030. Financing by equity is significant for listed firms. This study applied Dynamic Unbalanced Panel analysis techniques using Secondary data for 10-year period (2010 - 2019) with the study population comprising of 9 listed firms. A census of the firms was done and resulted to 86 observations. Focus was on equity financing moderated by economic growth and earnings volatility on firm value which was proxied by Tobin's Q and EVA. Pecking order guided the study. Longitudinal research design was used as it is appropriate when dealing with panel data. STATA version 15 was used for analysis. Model estimation followed a two Step System GMM testing the study hypotheses at 5 % significance level. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to show the strength and direction of association among the study variables. Equity financing had a negative correlation with Tobin Q (r = -0.2682). The regression weight being (β= -0.1674526; p = 0.002 < 0.005). On the other hand, Equity to assets ratio (EAR) was found to have positive correlation with Ln EVA (r= 0.5218). The regression coefficient was positive but not significant (β = 0.2901601; p = 0.087 > 0.05) and hence concluding that it improved firm value marginally. The study therefore concluded that equity financing structure directly determines value of the firm by eroding Tobin Q and hence equity financing need to be limited. Future studies can consider static panel analysis models and other panel data econometric techniques.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyze the relationship between equity financing and the value of the firm.

Methodology: The study adopted a longitudinal research design. The target population comprised the nine manufacturing firms which were listed on the Nairobi Securities exchange (NSE) for the period 2010 to 2019. The study used secondary data from the published financial statements of the firms. A census of the 9 manufacturing firms was done and this comprised a total of 86 observations due to missing data during the study period hence the Unbalanced Panel Analysis approach. Model Selection followed Arellano &Bond (1991) Panel data procedures. A two-step system GMM was used. STATA Version 15 software was used for data analysis. Unit root tests were conducted using the Im-Pesaran-Shin and Fisher-type tests which allow for unbalanced panels.

Findings: It was found that equity financing as was proxied by equity to assets ratio (EAR) had a weak negative correlation with Tobin Q. The regression weight for EAR with Tobin Q was negative and significant. The null hypothesis was thus rejected.  On the other hand, EAR was found to have a moderate positive correlation with Ln EVA The regression coefficient was positive but not significant hence, the null hypothesis was not rejected.  This objective showed mixed results possibly due to the different performance proxies.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The finding supports the Myers & Majluf model (1984) which posits that outside investors rationally discount the firm's stock price when managers issue equity instead of riskless debt. To avoid this discount, managers should avoid equity whenever possible. It also supports the Pecking Order theory that equity financing should be used as the last option. To the practice, corporate finance managers need to minimize use of equity financing due to its negative effect on firm value. For policy, The National Treasury needs to formulate an incentive driven policy targeting the manufacturing sector due to its critical role in Economic development as can be seen from the industrialized economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, R. & Harrington, C. (2011). Seasoned equity offerings: Characteristics of firms. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1 (3),26-33.

Arellano, M. & Bond, S.R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies 58, 2777297.

Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.

Baker, G. P., M. C. Jensen and K. J. Murphy (1988). 'Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory', Journal of Finance, 43, pp. 593-615.

Baker, G. P., M. C. Jensen and K. J. Murphy (1988). 'Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory', Journal of Finance, 43, pp. 593-615.

Baker, H. & Martin, G. (2011), Capital Structure and Corporate Financing Decisions: Theory, Evidence, and Practice, John Wiley and Sons.

Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Forecasting with panel data. Journal of forecasting, 27(2), 153-173.

Baltagi, B.H., Bresson, G. & Pirotte, A. (2003), Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman-Taylor? A pretest estimator, Economics Letter 79, 361-369.

Banafa, A.S. & Ngugi, J.K. (2015). Determinants of capital structure on profitability of firms in manufacturing sector in Kenya. International Journal of Current Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), pp.175-192.

Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (2000), GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions, Econometric Reviews, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 321-340.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.

Bond, S.R. (2002), Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice, Portuguese Economic Journal, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 141-162.

Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Hunt, A. and Maksimovic, D. (2001), Capital structure in developing countries, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 87-130.

Brounen, D., Jong, A. and Koedijk, K. (2006), Capital structure policies in Europe: survey evidence, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 1409-1442.

Buigut, K. , Soi, N., Koskei, I. & Kibet, J. (2013). The Effect of Capital Structure on Share Price On Listed Firms In Kenya. A Case of Energy Listed Firms; European Journal of Business and (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 Vol.5, No.9

Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. (2002), Testing trade off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-33.

Flannery, M.J. & Hankins, K.W. (2013), Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1-19.

Floegel, J. (1990) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 138, No. 5 pp. 1411-1449.

Frijins, B., Navissi, Rad, T. & Tsai, L. (2006). Stock price performance of seasoned equity offerings: completed vs. withdrawn. Managerial Finance, 32 (3), 234-246.

Hull, J. C., (2015). Options, Futures and Other Derivatives, 9th ed, Pearson, U.S.A

Ibrahim, A., S, Sabo, H., Kabiru, S., & Abubakar, S., I (2020). Equity Financing and Firm Value in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) |Volume IV, Issue VII, July 2020|ISSN 2454-6186

Javed, T., Younas, W. & Imran, M. (2014). Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistani Firms, International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 3, No. 5 ISSN: 2226-3624

KAM (2023). Manufacturing priority agenda; Resetting Manufacturing to achieve Agenda 20BY30. Retrieved 2023, March 22 from www.kam.go.ke.

Khemiri, W. & Noubbigh, H. (2018), Determinants of capital structure: evidence from sub-Saharan African firms, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 70 No. 11, pp. 150-159.

Lee, C.-F., Liang, W., Lin, F.-L. & Yang, Y. (2015), Applications of simultaneous equations in finance research: method and empirical results, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 943-971

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.

Modigliani F., Miller M., (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, The American Economic Review, 48(3): 261-281.

Moradi, A.&Paulet, E. (2019), The firm-specific determinants of capital structure-An empirical analysis of firms before and during the Euro Crisis, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 150-161.

Moulton, B.R., (1986), Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates, Journal of Econometrics 32, 385-397.

Musila, P. (2015). The relationship between equity financing and financial performance of the energy and petroleum companies listed at the NSE, Unpublished thesis.

Ngugi, R. W. (2008). Capital financing behaviour: evidence from firms listed on the Nairobi Stock Exchange. The European Journal of Finance, ISSN: 1351-847X (Print) 1466-4364 (Online).

Nyamoma, N. C., & Sporta, F. (2020). The Effect of Financing Decisions on Shareholders' Value Creation of Manufacturing Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange In Kenya. Unpublished thesis.

Omollo, A. B., Muturi, W. & Wanjare, J. (2018). Effect of Equity Financing Options on Financial Performance of Non-Financial Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya, Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 4 ISSN 2332-7294 E-ISSN 2332-7308.

Ramli, N.A., Latan, H. & Solovida, G.T. (2019), Determinants of capital structure and firm financialperformance"”a PLS-SEM approach: evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia.The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 148-160.

Ray, S. (2012). Efficacy of Economic Value-Added Concept in Business Performance Measurement. Advances in Information Technology and Management 2 (2): 260-267.

Saif-Alyousfi, Y.H, Md-Rus, R., Taufil-Mohd, K. N., Taib, H. M., & Shadar, H. K., (2020). Determinants of capital structure:evidence from Malaysian firms, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, Emerald Publishing Limited 1757-4323.

Sargan, J. (1958). "The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables." Econometrica 26(3): 393-415.

Sauro, M., & Tafirei, M. (2016). EVA and Stock Returns: Are They Correlated? Financial Assets and Investing, 7(2), 34-51.

Stewart, G.B. (1994). The Quest for Value, New York: Harper

Vo, X.V. (2017), Determinants of capital structure in emerging markets: evidence from Vietnam, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 105-113.

Yong, L. (2020). Industrialization as the driver of sustained prosperity. Vienna.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-19

How to Cite

Oganda, A. (2023). Equity Financing and Firm Value; Short Run and Long Run Dynamics: A Generalized Method of Moments Approach. International Journal of Economics, 8(1), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.1942

Issue

Section

Articles