Evaluation of Instructor-Generated Vs. Student-Generated Content in Online Humanities Courses in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijodl.2747Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the evaluation of instructor-generated vs. student-generated content in online humanities courses in South Africa.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Studies comparing instructor-generated and student-generated content in online humanities courses in South Africa indicate that instructor-generated content offers structured and consistent learning materials aligned with course objectives. Conversely, student-generated content enhances engagement, critical thinking, and collaborative skills among learners. Effective use of both approaches, tailored to course topics and student demographics, could optimize online humanities education outcomes in South Africa by balancing instructional guidance with student autonomy and creativity.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Constructivist learning theory, community of inquiry framework & self-determination theory may be used to anchor future studies on the evaluation of instructor-generated vs. student-generated content in online humanities courses in South Africa. Equip educators with pedagogical strategies that leverage both instructor expertise and student autonomy. Inform curriculum design policies that advocate for the integration of diverse content generation methods across humanities disciplines.
Downloads
References
Brazilian scholars. Retrieved from http://www.capes.gov.br/
Chang, H., & Zhu, X. (2021). Instructional design and technology in blended, hybrid, or online courses: A systematic review. TechTrends, 65(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00550-w
Department of Basic Education, South Africa. (2020). National Reading Coalition: Promoting literacy and reading proficiency among primary school students. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.za/
Federal Ministry of Education, Nigeria. (2021). STEM academies and innovation hubs: Fostering interest in science and technology fields among Nigerian youth. Retrieved from https://education.gov.ng/
Garcia (2021). Instructor-generated video lectures versus student-generated presentations in online art history courses: A comparative study. Journal of Digital Arts Education, 8(1), 18-34.
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (2019). Meaningful learning with technology (5th ed.). Routledge.
Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2018). Student-generated blogs in philosophy courses: Facilitating critical discourse and active learning. International Journal of Humanities Education, 12(3), 112-129.
Li, Y., & Pitts, J. P. (2017). Exploring factors influencing undergraduate students’ use of student-generated content in a college course. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de la Jeunesse et des Sports. (2020). Educational reforms in France: Enhancing critical thinking and interdisciplinary learning. Retrieved from https://www.education.gouv.fr/
Ministry of Education and Culture, Indonesia. (2021). Inclusive education policies: Improving access and learning outcomes for students with disabilities in Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/
Ministry of Education, Ghana. (2021). National Digital Learning Program: Enhancing educational access and quality through digital technologies. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.gh/
Nguyen, H., & Kim, D. (2019). Student-generated content for engagement and learning in an undergraduate business statistics course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118798339
Nguyen, H., & Smith, L. (2017). Instructor-generated podcasts versus student-generated discussion forums in sociology courses: A comparative analysis. Journal of Online Social Sciences, 3(1), 27-41.
Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Competency-based education reforms in Vietnam: Impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102287
OECD. (2020). Digital education policy trends: How are OECD countries responding to the digital transformation in education? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/08e4c0aa-en
Patel, R., & Sharma, S. (2019). Instructor-generated case studies versus student-generated projects in cultural studies courses: Enhancing critical thinking and collaborative learning. Journal of Distance Education, 34(2), 88-105.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sakamoto, A., & Kawabata, M. (2018). Effects of flipped learning on cognitive load and learning outcomes in secondary education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 25, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.001
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Silva, L., & Santos, A. (2020). Community-based education: Enhancing knowledge acquisition among vulnerable populations in Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102142
Smith, T., & Jones, R. (2019). Instructor-generated lectures versus student-generated multimedia presentations in online history courses: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(4), 210-228.
Thompson, G., & White, E. (2018). Instructor-generated lecture notes versus student-generated discussion threads in anthropology courses: Evaluating engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Online Anthropology Education, 7(3), 76-91.
UK Government. (2021). STEM education initiatives: Promoting practical skills and knowledge acquisition among students in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 166-189. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brenda Fassie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
