Effects of Trade Policies and Regulations on Global Livestock Markets and Food Security in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jlp.v3i1.2513Keywords:
Trade Policies, Regulations, Global Livestock Markets, Food SecurityAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of trade policies and regulations on global livestock markets and food security in Kenya.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study revealed that the effects of trade policies and regulations on global livestock markets and food security in Kenya underscore the intricate interplay between local agricultural systems and international trade dynamics. Trade policies, including tariffs, quotas, and sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, significantly influence Kenya's livestock sector by shaping market access, competitiveness, and domestic production levels. While trade liberalization measures may enhance market opportunities and foster economic growth, they also pose challenges to local farmers and food security by exposing them to international competition and market fluctuations.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: New Trade Theory & Institutional Theory may be used to anchor future studies on effects of trade policies and regulations on global livestock markets and food security in Kenya. Efforts should be made to enhance the transparency, coherence, and consistency of trade policies and regulations related to livestock markets. There is a need to adopt a balanced approach that promotes trade while safeguarding food security and sustainable development goals. Policymakers should prioritize measures that enhance the resilience and competitiveness of domestic livestock producers, particularly small-scale farmers and vulnerable communities. This could involve targeted support programs such as access to credit, technical assistance, and market information, aimed at improving productivity, market access, and income generation.
Downloads
References
Anderson, K., & Martin, W. (2017). Agricultural Trade Reform and Food Security: The Impact of Trade Costs. Food Security, 9(4), 715-728. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-017-0692-5
Bouamra-Mechemache, Z., & Fadhuile, A. (2017). The dairy sector in the trans-pacific partnership: Economic and environmental impacts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(5), 1296-1318. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aax039
Carbone, J. C., & Antón, J. (2017). The impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on intra-EU food trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(5), 799-823. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbw022
Cuong, N. V., & Van Huy, N. (2019). Trade policy impacts on livestock production system: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Global Economics, Management and Business Research, 11(1), 48-55.
FAO. (2019). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2019: World Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/ca3140en
FAO. (2020). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2020: World Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/ca9625en
Groom, B., & Koundouri, P. (2020). Livestock markets, trade policy uncertainty and Brexit: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Food Policy, 92, 101829. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101829
Headey, D., & Fan, S. (2020). Reflections on the global food security crisis amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 177-183. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12641
Jaleta, M., & Gebremedhin, B. (2016). The effects of trade policy on livestock sector performance in developing countries: A case study of Ethiopia. Food Policy, 61, 273-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.02.005
Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2012). International Economics: Theory and Policy (9th ed.). Pearson.
Kumar, P., & Wu, J. (2018). Impact of trade policies on food security: A comparative study of India and China. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 3(2), 154-164.
McCorriston, S., & Sheldon, I. (2018). Trade liberalization and livestock markets: The case of beef exports from the United States. Agricultural Economics, 49(3), 305-315. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12404
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Thornton, P. K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A., & Herrero, M. (2018). The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 126, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.01.004
Thornton, P. K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A., & Herrero, M. (2018). The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 126, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.01.004
USDA. (2021). Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf
World Trade Organization. (2020). Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/sps_e.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jackson Mwenda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
