Land Tenure Policies and Property Rights Affecting Livestock Production in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jlp.v3i1.2514Keywords:
Land Tenure Policies, Property Rights, Livestock ProductionAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate land tenure policies and property rights affecting livestock production in Bangladesh.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study revealed a significant influence of secure land tenure on livestock productivity, investment decisions, and sustainability. Secure property rights are consistently associated with higher levels of livestock productivity, increased investment in animal husbandry practices, and improved land management strategies among rural households. Moreover, tenure security facilitates long-term investments in livestock genetic improvement programs, leading to higher milk yields and improved household incomes among dairy farmers.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Institutional Theory & Property Rights Theory may be used to anchor future studies on land tenure policies and property rights affecting livestock production in Bangladesh. Promote community-based natural resource management approaches that recognize customary land tenure systems. Empowering local communities to manage their grazing lands can enhance ecological sustainability, reduce conflicts, and improve livelihoods among pastoralist groups. Advocate for the legal recognition of customary land rights and indigenous knowledge systems in national land tenure policies. Acknowledging traditional tenure arrangements can strengthen tenure security, promote social equity, and enhance the resilience of livestock production systems.
Downloads
References
Abebe, G., & Admassie, A. (2016). The impact of land certification on household food security in Ethiopia: Empirical evidence from a household survey. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 25(2), 1-26.
Boudreau, T., & Blackmore, E. (2018). The impacts of property rights and resource management on smallholder cattle production in Ghana. World Development, 106, 20-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.003
Cotula, L., Toulmin, C., & Quan, J. (2007). Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. Routledge.
DEFRA. (2021). Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2020. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/agriculture-in-the-united-kingdom-2020
Deininger, K., & Jin, S. (2018). Tenure security and land-related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 101, 268-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.016
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359.
FAO. (2018). The contribution of livestock to food and nutrition security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/ca0411en
FAO. (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/ca3138en
FAO. (2021). The future of livestock in Africa: Opportunities and challenges for the next decade. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/cb5128en
Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2016). Institutional arrangements and grazing management: Evidence from western Tanzania. Journal of Development Studies, 52(3), 414-431. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1091715
ILRI. (2020). Livestock Data Innovation in Africa (LDIA): Data Needs Assessment for Livestock Research and Development in Africa. International Livestock Research Institute. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110314
ILRI. (2020). Livestock Data Innovation in Africa (LDIA): Data Needs Assessment for Livestock Research and Development in Africa. International Livestock Research Institute. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110314
Lengoiboni, M., & Said, M. Y. (2017). Customary land tenure and pastoralism in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities. Pastoralism, 7(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1186/s13570-017-0091-6
MAFF. (2021). Statistical Tables of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Japan 2020. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. Retrieved from https://www.maff.go.jp/e/tokei/kikaku/nenji_e/attach/pdf/index-10.pdf
Muma, J. B., & Munyeme, M. (2016). Factors associated with foot and mouth disease vaccination compliance and non-compliance in Zambia. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports, 7, 149-156. DOI: 10.2147/VMRR.S119102
Mwangi, E., & Dohrn, S. (2020). Impact of land tenure on livelihoods: evidence from Kenya. Land Use Policy, 97, 104707. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104707
Nkonya, E., & Kato, E. (2019). The impact of land tenure security on agricultural productivity in Uganda: Evidence from the Uganda Census of Agriculture 2008/2009. The World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-8894
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Shumba, E. M., & Mazvimavi, K. (2017). Policy effects on land tenure and livestock management in southern Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(6), 506-519. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1315163
Takahashi, R., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2019). Property rights, collective action, and livestock development: Lessons from the Ethiopia livestock and fishery value chain initiative. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101950. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101950
USDA. (2021). Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf
USDA-ERS. (2021). Organic Market Overview. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/organic-agriculture/organic-market-overview/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Rishit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.