IS DISTANCE e-LEARNING OPTION ACCEPTABLE BY NIGERIANS AMIDST COVID-19 PANDEMIC?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1193Keywords:
COVID-19 Pandemic, Distance e-learning, Nigeria's education systemAbstract
Purpose: In Nigeria, the current COVID-19 Pandemic stands-still virtually all formal learning activities, especially in Government owned institutions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the perception and readiness of Nigerians on adapting Distance e-Learning option during and even after the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Methodology: The study applied a quantitative cross-sectional design approach. A closed-ended e-questionnaire was designed using google form and distributed in a snowball fashion-wise via online platforms. Three categories of the audience were targeted: teachers, students and parents. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. ANOVA was used to analyze the collective decision across the three categories.
Findings: The findings revealed that there is no difference amongst the three groups in their final decisions on willingness to adapt (F (0.187), p-value 0.83), and kick-start distance learning (F (0.469), p-value 0.63). Poor internet infrastructure and unstable electricity supply were some of the challenges identified.
Unique contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: The study highlights the willingness of Nigerians in adapting distance e-learning approach as a viable alternative to traditional face-face learning amidst COVID-19 Pandemic and beyond. Administrative involvements are crucial to actualizing this educational dream of Nigerians.
Downloads
References
2. Al Lily AE, Ismail AF, Abunasser FM, Alhajhoj Alqahtani RH. Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in Society. 2020 Nov 1;63:101317.
3. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H, Aborajooh EA, et al. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 Oct 2 [cited 2020 Nov 28];20. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530879/
4. Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guà rdia L, Koole M. Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigit Sci Educ. 2020 October 1;2(3):923-45.
5. Doghonadze N, Aliyev A, Halawachy H, Knodel L, Adedoyin AS. The Degree of Readiness to Total Distance Learning in the Face of COVID-19 - Teachers' View (Case of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iraq, Nigeria, UK and Ukraine) | Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 2];5(2). Available from: https://jebs.ibsu.edu.ge/jms/index.php/jebs/article/view/197
6. Adeoye IA, Adanikin AF, Adanikin A. COVID-19 and E-Learning: Nigeria Tertiary Education System Experience.pdf. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. 2020;V(V).
7. UNESCO. COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response [Internet]. UNESCO. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 17]. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response
8. Oyediran WO, Omoare AM, Owoyemi MA, Adejobi AO, Fasasi RB. Prospects and limitations of e-learning application in private tertiary institutions amidst COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Heliyon. 2020 Nov;6(11):e05457.
9. Ifijeh G, Yusuf F. Covid - 19 pandemic and the future of Nigeria's university system: The quest for libraries' relevance. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2020 Nov;46(6):102226.
10. Salamat P, Ahmad L, Bakht G, Saifi I. Effects of e-learning on students' academic learning at university level. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 2018 July 9;2(2).
11. Elfaki NK, Abdulraheem I, Abdulrahim R. Impact of E-Learning vs Traditional Learning on Student's Performance and Attitude. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2019;8(10):76-82.
12. Zare M, Sarikhani R, Salari M, Mansouri V. THE IMPACT OF E-LEARNING ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND CREATIVITY. Journal of Technical Education and Training [Internet]. 2016 Jun 28 [cited 2020 Dec 30];8(1). Available from: https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/1152
13. Hossein Z, Rogaye M, Mehdi B. THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ON PROMOTION OF CREATIVE THINKING. Innovation & creativity in human science. 2013 January 1;3(2):39-59.
14. Alkhalaf S, Drew S, Alhussain T. Assessing the Impact of e-Learning Systems on Learners: A Survey Study in the KSA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012 January 1;47:98-104.
15. Zinn KL. Computer-assisted learning and teaching. In: Encyclopedia of Computer Science. GBR: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2003. p. 328-36.
16. Dabbagh N. Pedagogical Models for E-Learning: A Theory-Based Design Framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning. 2005;1(1):25-44.
17. Aparicio M, Bacao F, Oliveira T. An e-Learning Theoretical Framework. Educational Technology & Society. 2016;19(1):292-307.
18. Jonassen D, Grabinger RS, Harris N. Analysing and Selecting Instructional Strategies and Tactics. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2008;3:29-47.
19. Lominadze TN, Papiashvili RG, Asatiani TM. Instructional strategies for e-learning. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT). 2011. p. 1-4.
20. Ali SA. Top 4 Proven Instructional Design Strategies to Enhance eLearning for Corporate Training - eLearning [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from: https://elearning.adobe.com/2017/11/top-4-proven-instructional-design-strategies-to-enhance-elearning-for-corporate-training/
21. Worldometer [Internet]. 2020. Available from: www.worldometers.info "º coronavirus
22. NCDC. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://ncdc.gov.ng/
23. Shulman LS. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher. 1986;15(12).
24. Youm J, Corral J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Among Medical Educators: What Is Our Readiness to Teach With Technology? Academic Medicine. 2019 Nov;94:S69-72.
25. Dietrich L. Unpack TPACK in your Classroom. In: Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018 [Internet]. Power Learning Solutions; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 17]. Available from: https://techandcurriculum.pressbooks.com/chapter/tpack/
26. Mishra P, Koehler M, Kereluik K. The Song Remains the Same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS. 2009 Sep;53(5):48-53.
27. Alhabeeb A, Rowley J. Critical success factors for eLearning in Saudi Arabian universities. Intl Jnl of Educational Mgt. 2017 March 13;31(2):131-47.
28. Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 Pandemic. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2020 May 22;1-20.
29. Salloum SA, Al-Emran M, Shaalan K, Tarhini A. Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Educ Inf Technol. 2019 January 1;24(1):509-30.
30. Olasunkanmi I. Nigerian university students find online learning painful: here's why [Internet]. The Conversation. 2020 [cited 2020 September 17]. Available from: http://theconversation.com/nigerian-university-students-find-online-learning-painful-heres-why-143919
31. Aliyev A, Halawachy H, Knodel L, Adedoyin AS. The Degree of Readiness to Total Distance Learning in the Face of COVID-19 - Teachers' View (Case of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iraq, Nigeria, UK and Ukraine). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 6];5(2). Available from: https://jebs.ibsu.edu.ge/jms/index.php/jebs/article/view/197
32. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail N, Ross H, Wohltjen H, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013 Dec;11(1):4.
33. Almaiah MA, Jalil MA, Man M. Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. J Comput Educ. 2016 December 1;3(4):453-85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.