Corporate Governance, Top Management Capabilities and Performance of Commercial State Corporations in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ejbsm.3248Keywords:
Corporate Governance, Top Management Capabilities, Performance, Commercial State CorporationsAbstract
Purpose: Commercial state corporations refer to a State or county corporation or agency and includes a subsidiary of a state or county agency. Commercial state corporations can perform roles commercially and some non-commercially but which serve a strategic socio-economic objective as may be defined by the president in various instances. Commercial state corporations are central players in the initiative to foster national growth. The objective of this study was to determine the top management in the relationship between corporate governance and performance of commercial state corporations in Kenya.
Methodology: The variables considered in this paper are corporate governance conceptualized as an independent variable and anchored on agency theory, top management capabilities as the intervening variable, anchored on upper echelon theory and performance as the dependent variable. The study used a descriptive research design and a positivist worldview. With the aid of key informants from these corporations, a semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 47 commercial state corporations. The data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, notably Pearson's Product Moment Correlation and regression analysis for hypotheses and other statistical tests.
Findings: The study discovered that top management capabilities positively and statistically intervene the relationship between corporate governance and performance.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The results support assertions of the agency theory that corporate governance is key for organisations that need to achieve superior competitiveness over the long-term and thus outperform rival firms. Stewardship theory (ST), upper echelon theory (UET) and resource dependency theory were applied to expound the empirical connections, hence expanding knowledge of the subject under investigation. Policymakers can utilise the findings to develop favourable technology policies and robust regulatory frameworks to manage competition. Therefore, commercial state corporations must take a keen interest in scanning the market for emerging technologies in the country. The findings enriched the subject matter by reducing the three gaps that were identified by the study first, the constructs of interest; corporate governance, macro environment and top management capabilities to performance had not been studied in the commercial state corporations in Kenya.
Downloads
References
Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011-1025.
Bae, John, Sang-Joon Kim, and Hannah Oh. (2018). Taming polysemous signals: The role of marketing intensity on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance. Review of Financial Economics 33: 29–40.
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107 – 124.
Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(5), 911-931
Bhagat, S and B. Black (2002). “The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Company Performance”, The Journal of Corporation Law, Vol 27, No 2
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182
Bhagat, S and B. Black (2002). “The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Company Performance”, The Journal of Corporation Law, Vol 27, No 2
Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Sanders, W.G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6): 749-778
Clarke, Thomas and dela Rama, Marie, (2008). The Fundamental Dimensions and Dilemmas of Corporate Governance. Thomas Clarke, Marie Dela Rama, eds., SAGE Publications, Volume 4.
Combs. J, Crock. T.S and Shook. C 2005). The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 2:259-286
Donaldson. W. (2003), "Congressional testimony concerning the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Ehsan, S. (2019), “Corporate social responsibility; measurement, and its nexus with earning’s management and corporate governance”, Doctoral dissertation, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad).
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of law and economics, 26, pp 301-325.
Gatamah. K (2002). The corporate enterprise in Africa: Governance, citizenship and social responsibility. Corporate Ownership and Control 1(3):139-144.
Gillis, W. E., Combs, J. G., & Yin, X. (2018). Franchise management capabilities and franchisor performance under alternative franchise ownership strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1)
Hermano, V., & Martín-Cruz, N. (2016). The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3447-3458.
Huynh, K. T., Gudergan, S. P., & Wilden, R. (2018). The interaction between top management teams and board of directors in dynamic capabilities. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 16085.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, C., & Jiang, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach. Journal of Business Research, 87, 46-57
Kakanda, Mohammed and Bello, Ahmed and Abba, Mohammed, (2016). Effect of Capital Structure on the Performance of Listed Consumer Goods Companies in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 7, No. 8
Koryak, O., Mole, K. F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J. C., Ucbasaran, D., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 89-10
Mahuika, N., & Mahuika, R. (2020). Wānanga as a research methodology. ALTERNATIVE: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 16(4), 369-377.
Mugwang'a J. O (2018). Synergy of Top Management Team Characteristics, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: How Performance of Large Manufacturing Firms Changed. Archives of Business Research – Vol.6, No.6
Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 373-382
Nishii, L., Gotte, A., & Raver, J. (2007). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between upper echelon diversity, the adoption of diversity practices, and organizational performance (CAHRS Working Paper #07- 04). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
Okiro, D. K. (2015). Josiah Aduda, Nixon Omoro (March 2015). The Effect of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure on Performance of Firms Listed at The East African Community Securities Exchange.
Pegels, C. C., & Yang, B. (2000). The impact of managerial characteristics on strategic assets management capabilities. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 6(5/6), 97-107.
Sahimi, M., Rizal, A. M., Husin, M. M., & Kamarudin, S. (2017). The role of management capabilities on entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth relationship. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 3013-3015
Salehi, M., DashtBayaz, M. L., & Moghadam, S. M. (2018). The relationship between management characteristics and firm innovation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(7), 1113-1131.
Singh, K. K. (2022). Research methodology in social science. KK Publications
Spithoven, A., & Teirlinck, P. (2015). Internal capabilities, network resources and appropriation mechanisms as determinants of R&D outsourcing. Research Policy, 44(3), 711-725.
Solomon, J. (2013), Corporate Governance and Accountability, 4th Edn, Wiley, Chichester
Tarawneh, M. (2006). A Comparison of Financial Performance in the Banking Sector: Some Evidence from Omani Commercial Banks. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 3, 101-112.
Tseng, S. M., & Lee, P. S. (2014). The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(2), 158-179
Zenger, T.D., & Lawrence, B.S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effect of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2): 355-376.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elvis Songa, Prof. Josiah Aduda, PhD, Dr. Onesmus Nzioka, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
