Effect of Flow of Information on Student Engagement in Public Universities in Nairobi City County, Kenya

Authors

  • Cecilia Wakarindi Maina Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Prof. Hellen Mberia Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.2126
Abstract views: 85
PDF downloads: 51

Keywords:

Information Flow, Student Engagement, Public Universities

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of flow of information on student engagement in public universities in Kenya

Methodology: The study used a mixed research design with both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The target population was all the students in the public universities within Nairobi City County.  A sample of 384 students was drawn from the five public chartered universities’ main campuses, using a combination of various probability sampling techniques including stratified, simple random sampling and systematic sampling. The academic registrar in each of the university was sampled for interviews using purposive sampling. The research instruments for this study were self-administered questionnaires for students and semi-structured interviews for the registrars. Quantitative data was analyzed using the SPSS software and the inferential statistics used were descriptive, correlation, regression and ANOVA analysis. Qualitative data was analyzed for themes, and triangulation of both quantitative and qualitative data done.

Findings: Lateral communication (student-student) is well established in public universities and students easily share information with one another. Downward (management-student) and upward (student-management) communication was however wanting with students feeling that they are not consulted enough even on issues that directly affect them. This is despite having representation by their student representatives at various levels of the decision-making processes in the university. Students also stated that they could not freely communicate their opinions to the management despite being provided with channels to do so.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study was guided by the Organizational Information Theory (OIT). The study therefore recommended that better ways of engaging students directly, such as meetings could also be considered instead of relying on student leadership representation alone. Public universities should establish clear and comprehensive communication policies that outline the channels, frequency, and modes of communication between the institution, faculty, and students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adey.D & Andrew. M (2002) Getting it Right: A Manager’s Guide to Business Communication. Juta & Co Ltd

Albalawi, H., and Nadeem, M. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Ineffective Formal Communication between Teachers and Students: A Case Study of Mustaqbal University and Jubail University College, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching; Vol. 13, No. 3. doi: 10.5539/elt. v13n3p68

Ariani.D. W (2015) Relationship Model of Personality, Communication, Student Engagement and Learning Satisfaction, Business Management and Education, 13(2):175-202

Butucha.G (2016) Emerging Trends in Student Engagement in the 21st Century Contemporary World, Baraton Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 6(Special Issue), pp 39-43

Czarniawska, B. (2005). Karl Weick: Concepts, style and reflection. Sociological Review 53(s1):267 – 278 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00554. •

Harris.L. L (2011) Secondary Teachers Conception of Student Engagement: engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education 27(2): 376–386.

Hart, A. J. (2016). Exploring the Influence of Management Communication Behaviors on Employee Engagement. Unpublished PhD Thesis, College of Management and Technology, Walden University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/

Lunenburg, F.C. (2010). Formal Communication Channels: Upward, Downward, Horizontal and External. Focus on Colleges, Universities & Schools.

Macey.W.H; Schneider (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement: Industrial Organizational Psychology 1(1): 1–83

Mahto, R. & Davis, P. (2012). Information Flow and Strategic Consensus in Organizations. International Journal of Business and Management. 7.10.5539/ijbm. v7n17p1.

Mbhele, S. (2016) Internal Communication in Achieving Employee Engagement within a South African Government (unpublished thesis), University of Pretoria.

Pongton, P., and Suntrayuth, S. (2019) Communication Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance in Higher Education Institutions. ABAC Journal Vol.39, No.3, pp 90-110.

Reeve, J. (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement, in S. C. Christenson, et al. (Eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science + Business Media, 149–172.

Rousydiy, M and M. Kom.I (2020) Patterns of Organizational Communication to Effect the Distribution of Information”, Sarwah: Journal of Islamic Civilization and Thought, 18(01), pp. 49-70. Available at: http://ejurnal.iainlhokseumawe.ac.id/index.php/sarwah/article/view/830

Saks, A.M (2006) Antecedents & Consequences of Employee Engagement, Journal of Managerial Psychology 21(7): 600–619.

Sarangi, P., and Nayak, B. (2016). Employee Engagement and Its Impact on Organizational Success –A Study in Manufacturing Company, India. OSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) Volume 18, Issue 4.Ver. I (Apr. 2016), PP 52-57

Schemerhorn, J., Osborn, R., Uhl-Bien, M., Hunt, J. (2011) Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey: Wiley

Shehu, D., Osmani, M., Menkshi, E., and Kuçi, A. (2018). Issues of Communication between Academic Staff and Students in the Higher Education Institutions of Albania-a Descriptive Approach. European Journal of Social Sciences. 248-254.

Skinner & Pitzer (2012) Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping and Everyday Resilience, S.L. Christenson et al. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Student

Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

West, R. and Turner, L. H. (2017). Introduction to Communication Theory: Analysis and Applications (6th ed.). Salemba Humanika

Wood, A. (2009). Speaking my language? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 14(1), 92-97.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-02

How to Cite

Maina, C., & Mberia, H. (2023). Effect of Flow of Information on Student Engagement in Public Universities in Nairobi City County, Kenya. International Journal of Communication and Public Relation, 8(4), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.2126

Issue

Section

Articles