The Rise of Network Governance and the Changing Nature of Leadership Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlg.3299Keywords:
Corruption, Public Administration, Transactional Relationships, Personnel Management, Public Policy, Political Economy, D73, H89, L14, M12, Z18Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the rise of network governance and the changing nature of leadership power.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. The study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: Preliminary empirical review revealed that network governance transformed leadership power from traditional hierarchical control to relational, collaborative, and adaptive roles. Leaders operated in complex environments that demanded negotiation and trust-building rather than authority. The study highlighted the urgent need to realign leadership development and governance frameworks to match the demands of dynamic, network-based systems.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Network Governance theory, Transformational Leadership theory and Complexity Leadership theory may be used to anchor future studies on the rise of network governance. The study recommended revising leadership theories to reflect relational and adaptive roles in network governance. It suggested that training should focus on collaboration, cultural intelligence, and managing complexity.
Downloads
References
Agranoff, R. (2017). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy017
Bailey, D., & Woodhouse, D. (2022). Leadership and governance in the Brexit process: A fragmented state. Leadership, 18(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221105630
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Evangelista, R., & Bruno, F. (2022). WhatsApp and political engagement in Brazil: A new terrain for leadership power? Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2043104
Evangelista, R., & Bruno, F. (2022). WhatsApp and political engagement in Brazil: A new terrain for leadership power? Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2043104
Ezeanya-Esiobu, C. (2019). Leadership, governance, and the rise of network organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Organization Review, 19(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00445-6
Fonseca, L. M., & Cunha, J. S. (2022). Innovation, leadership, and performance in Brazilian companies: Network governance as a key driver. Management Decision, 60(5), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0013
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2018). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the networked political landscape. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1436974
Gallup. (2023). How employee preferences are reshaping leadership power. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(2), 101631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101631
Gao, J., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2017). Overcoming the liability of “outsidership”: A cross‐national study of venture capital investment in emerging economies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0056
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2019). Accelerating digital innovation inside and out: Agile teams, ecosystems, and ethics. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1443969
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686885
Morris, J. C. (2022). Network governance and leadership: An empirical review of public sector transformations. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13462
Nakano, D., & Watanabe, C. (2020). Co-evolution of innovations in a network society: Leadership challenges in Japan’s Society 5.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119921
Nhema, A. (2022). Youth leadership, network governance, and political change in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Innovation and Digital Economy (IJIDE), 13(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIDE.2022040103
Ospina, S. M., Foldy, E. G., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2020). Emergent leadership: Constructing leadership and power in networked settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101317
Park, S., & Hyun, H. (2021). Empowering leadership, network structures, and employee engagement: A UK study. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101449
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2015). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0053
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2017). Network governance and the differentiated polity: Selected essays. Public Health, 143, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx036
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). Governance on a bumpy road from enchantment to disenchantment: A narrative analysis of interactive governance. Public Administration, 96(2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12325
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Yamakawa, T., & Ostrom, E. (2021). Reframing leadership practices in Japanese organizations: From hierarchy to networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 30(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12301
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nathan Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
