Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Family Structure in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijs.1824Keywords:
Family, Industrial revolution, Career, MarriageAbstract
Purpose: The study sought to analyze the impacts of industrial revolution on the family structure in Nigeria
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The results show that there has been a change of family structure since the pre industrialization era and the post industrialization era. The historical process of industrialization changed the ways in which families were structured and interacted. Family bonding are decreasing and divorce rate is increasing rapidly. These shift not only affected the roles of spouses and parents but also those of children. Industrialization changed gender roles and Enlightenment philosophies that inspired new ideals of equality, personal freedom, and individualism.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The modernization theory, Talcott Parsons' theory and the classic sociological theory may be used to anchor future studies in the sociology sector. The study results will also benefit other stakeholders such as the policy makers as well as researchers and scholars from different parts of the world. The top management of both public and private industries in the country will also use the study findings to improve families and ensure high and stable performance in all their activities and programs. The study recommends that the adoption of effective social protection development policies in the family structure will help to improve efficiency in their major operations and activities.
Downloads
References
Anak Agung Sagung, M. A., & Sri Darma, G. (2020). Revealing the digital leadership spurs in 4.0 industrial revolution. Asri, AASMAN, & Darma, GS, Revealing the digital leadership spurs in, 4, 93-100.
Bhambhani, C., & Inbanathan, A. (2018). Not a mother, yet a woman: Exploring experiences of women opting out of motherhood in India. Asian journal of women's studies, 24(2), 159-182.
Cowan, R. S. (2018). The "Industrial Revolution" in the home: household technology and social change in the twentieth century. In The Routledge Companion to Modernity, Space and Gender (pp. 69-85). Routledge.
Cowie, P., Townsend, L., & Salemink, K. (2020). Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution?. Journal of rural studies, 79, 169-176.
Elnakat, A., & Gomez, J. D. (2015). Energy engenderment: An industrialized perspective assessing the importance of engaging women in residential energy consumption management. Energy Policy, 82, 166-177.
Evans, R. J., & Lee, W. R. (2015). The German Family (Routledge Revivals): Essays on the Social History of the Family in Nineteenth-and Twentieth-Century Germany. Routledge.
Fithratullah, M. (2021). Representation of Korean values sustainability in American remake movies. Teknosastik, 19(1), 60-73.
Gilman, N. (2018). Modernization theory never dies. History of Political Economy, 50(S1), 133-151.
Glenn, E. N. (2016). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. Mothering, 1-29.
Haraway, D. J., & Goodeve, T. N. (2018). Race: Universal donors in a vampire culture: It's all in the family. Biological kinship categories in the twentieth-century United States. In Modest_Witness@ Second_Millennium. FemaleMan© _Meets_OncoMouseTM (pp. 213-265). Routledge.
Meyer, J. W. (2018). A World Society Perspective. State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn, 123.
Miralles, C. S. (2015). Neglecting the 19th century: Democracy, the consensus trap and modernization theory in Spain. History of the Human Sciences, 28(3), 51-67.
Omwami, E. M. (2015). Intergenerational comparison of education attainment and implications for empowerment of women in rural Kenya. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(8), 1106-1123.
Stearns, P. N. (2020). The industrial revolution in world history. Routledge.
Stockemer, D., & Sundström, A. (2016). Modernization theory: How to measure and operationalize it when gauging variation in women's representation?. Social Indicators Research, 125, 695-712.
Winther, T., & Wilhite, H. (2015). Tentacles of modernity: Why electricity needs anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 30(4), 569 577.
Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Opportunities and challenges. International journal of financial research, 9(2), 90-95.
Zabriskie, P. (2016). Representing female artistic labour, 1848-1890: refining work for the middle-class woman. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Todabi Ajabi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.