Impact of Economic Sanctions on Diplomatic Relations: A Comparative Analysis in United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.2603Keywords:
Economic Sanctions, Diplomatic Relation, Comparative AnalysisAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of economic sanctions on diplomatic relations: a comparative analysis
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Economic sanctions wielded by the United States impact diplomatic relations in multifaceted ways. While they can isolate adversaries economically, they often strain diplomatic ties, escalating tensions. Success hinges on factors like target country resilience and international support. Unilateral actions may undermine US diplomatic credibility. Diplomatic efforts, like negotiations and exemptions, are vital for mitigating consequences and fostering conflict resolution.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theory of economic coercion, theory of reciprocity and tit-for-tat & theory of economic interdependence may be used to anchor future studies on impact of economic sanctions on diplomatic relations: a comparative analysis. Diplomatic practitioners should prioritize sustained engagement and dialogue as essential tools for managing the diplomatic fallout of economic sanctions, leveraging both traditional and non-traditional diplomatic channels. Policymakers should adopt flexible and context-specific approaches to economic sanctions, recognizing that a one-size-fits-all approach may not effectively achieve diplomatic objectives.
Downloads
References
African Union Commission. (2020). Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. https://au.int/en/agenda2063/about
ASEAN Secretariat. (2020). ASEAN Key Figures 2019. https://asean.org/storage/2020/07/ASEAN-Key-Figures-2019.pdf
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.
Davis, Z. S. (2008). Targeted sanctions and diplomatic initiatives: Addressing the incentives of nuclear proliferators. Contemporary Security Policy, 29(1), 150-175.
Drezner, D. W. (2003). The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization, 57(3), 643-659.
ECLAC. (2020). Trade and Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/events/files/trade_and_integration_in_latin_america_and_the_caribbean_2019.pdf
European Commission. (2020). Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) - EU relations. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/regions/africa-caribbean-pacific-acp_en
Garcia, M. (2015). "Soft Power Diplomacy: Mitigating the Diplomatic Fallout of Economic Sanctions." International Relations Journal, 28(2), 210-228.
Gulf Research Center. (2020). GCC Annual Report 2020. https://www.grc.net/gcconline/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GRC_GCC-Annual-Report-2020.pdf
Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., & Elliott, K. A. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3rd ed.). Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Johnston, D. (2020). China's Belt and Road Initiative in Sub-Saharan Africa: Indebted development. New Political Economy, 25(3), 349-366. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1645207
Kim, S. (2017). "Network Analysis of Diplomatic Relations: Before and After Economic Sanctions." Global Politics Review, 12(1), 78-95.
Lee, S. H. (2016). "Comparative Analysis of Economic Sanctions: North Korea vs. Russia." Comparative Politics Review, 30(4), 567-586.
Lektzian, D., & Souva, M. (2007). The threat and imposition of economic sanctions, 1971-2000. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24(1), 3-25.
Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Statistical Bulletin of China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation (2019). http://images.mofcom.gov.cn/www/202101/20210122154127635.pdf
Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2020). South Asia. https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/South_Asia_July_2020.pdf
Nguyen, T. (2018). "Longitudinal Analysis of Diplomatic Relations under Economic Sanctions." Journal of International Affairs, 40(3), 345-362.
Office for National Statistics. (2020). UK trade: September 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/internationaltrade/bulletins/uktrade/september2020
Pacific Alliance. (2020). What is the Pacific Alliance? https://alianzapacifico.net/en/pacific-alliance/
Pape, R. A. (1997). Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work. International Security, 22(2), 90-136.
Pape, R. A. (1997). Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security, 22(2), 90-136
Patel, A. (2019). "Negotiating Diplomatic Solutions: Lessons from the Iran Nuclear Deal." Diplomatic Quarterly, 35(2), 210-229.
Smith, J. R., et al. (2017). "Diplomatic Responses to Economic Coercion: A Case Study Analysis." Journal of Diplomatic Studies, 25(1), 120-138.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). (2020). USAID in Africa. https://www.usaid.gov/africa
U.S. Department of State. (2020). U.S. Relations with Sub-Saharan Africa. https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-sub-saharan-africa/
U.S. Department of State. (2020). United States Relations with the European Union. https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-european-union/
Wang, Y. (2018). "Economic Sanctions and Diplomatic Relations: A Quantitative Analysis." International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 456-475.
Whitfield, L., & Therkildsen, O. (2019). South Africa's influence and governance in Sub-Saharan Africa: From liberation to neoliberalism, from Mandela to Zuma. Third World Quarterly, 40(6), 1150-1168. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1574383
World Bank. (2020). West Africa Economic Outlook. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/westafrica/publication/west-africa-economic-outlook-october-2020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Isabella Davis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
