Determination of Optimal Plant Density of Adapted Maize Varieties in the Low and Mid-altitude Ecologies of Tanzania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ija.2314Keywords:
Plant Density, OPV, Grain Yield, Anthesis Days, Silking Days, MSVAbstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to validate the commonly recommended plant density in the target zone to maximize maize production and productivity. The commonly recommended plant density is 44,444 plants/ha for decades. However, there is no recent study done to validate this practice if it optimizes productivity under current climate and soil fertility variability. A blanket recommendation has been used for decades without validation for optimum productivity that farmer can realize.
Methodology: The factorial experiment was used with the total of 18 treatment combinations in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications according to Gomez, A and Gomez, K (1983). The open pollinated varieties (OPV) commonly grown by small scale farmers were planted in three different plant densities of 44,444, 53,333 and 66,666 plants per hector with inter and intra row spacings of 0.75mx0.3m, 0.75mx0.25m and 0.75mx0.2m respectively. Field management was done as usual following the recommended agronomic practices.
Findings: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done using GENSTAT (9th edition) statistical programme software and presented in a tabular form. The results indicated no significant difference in all parameters analysed except for 50% anthesis days (AD) and 50% Silking days (SD) both at 0.1% levels. The overall site mean for grain yield was found to be 6.43t/ha, 7.31t/ha and 6.11t/ha for the plant density of 44,444plants/ha, 53,333plants/ha and 66,666plants/ha respectively. Therefore, based on these findings the optimum plant density was found to be 53,333/ha unlike the commonly used plant density of 44,444 plants/ha.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This study contributes to existing experience and practice commonly recommended by extension officers in many parts of the country without performing a site-specific study to determine the optimum spacing for particular environment. This, study also open up an avenue for further research to validate various research technologies. Plant population, in addition to plant height, maturity class, and row spacings, affects the geometry of plant spacing and leaf distribution. All these factors may affect light and CO2 penetration in the canopy, as well as water use rate (Tharp, B and Kells, J, 2001)
Downloads
References
Abuzar, M., Sadozai, G., Baloch, S., Baloch, A., Shah, I., Javaid, T. and Hussain, N. (2011). Effect of Plant Population Densities on Yield of Maize. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(4): 692-695.
Al-Naggar, M., Shabana, R., Atta, M., and Al-Khalil, T (2015). Maize response to elevated plant density combined with lowered N-fertilizer rate is genotype-dependent. Crop J. 3, 96-109.doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.002
Bakhtiar, K., Marwat, B., Saeed, M., Hussain, Z., and Ali, H. (2011). Impact of tillage, plant population and mulches on weed management and grain yield of maize, Pak. J. Bot., 43 (3): 1603-1606.
Bozorgi, R., Doustan, Z., Sadeghi, M., Keshavarz, A., Faraji, A., Tarighi, F. and Azarpour, E. (2011). Study effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and yield components of maize cultivar, SCI704). World Appl. Sci. J., 13(1):147-151.
Casini, P. (2012). Maize production as affected by sowing date, plant density and row spacing in
The Bolivian Amazon. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev. 106, 75-84. Chinyere, P. 2013. Plant Spacing, Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Local and Improved Maize Cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences.
Deng, J., Ran, J., Wang, Z., Fan, Z., Wang, G., Ji, M., (2012). Models and tests of optimal density and maximal yield for crop plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 15823-15828.
Duvick, D. (2005). The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv. Agron. 86, 83-145. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(05)86002-X
Gobeze L., Ceronio, M.G. and Daniel, V. R. 2012. Effect of Row Spacing and Plant Density on Yield and Yield Component of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Irrigation, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, (2):263-271.
Gomez, K and Gomez, A (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. John Willey and Sons, (1983) New York.
Kaliba, A., Verkuijl, W., Mwangi, A., Mwilawa, P., Anandajayasekeram, M and Moshi, A (1998). Adoption of Maize Production Technologies in Central Tanzania. Mexico, D.F: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), the United Republic of Tanzania and Southern Africa Centre for Cooperation in Agricultural Research.
Liu, W., and Tollenaar, M. (2009). Response of yield heterosis to increasing plant density in maize. Crop Sci. 49, 1807-1816. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0422
Mugabe, P., Renkamp, T., Ryback, C., Mbwana, H., Gordon, C., Sieber, S and Lohr, K (2022).Governing COVID-19: Analyzing the effects of policy responses on food systems in Tanzania. Agriculture and Food Security Journal
NAERLS and FDAE (2017). Agricultural Performance Survey of 2016 Wet Season in Nigeria. Zaria: NAERLS Press.
Sangoi, L. 2000. Understanding Plant Density Effects on Maize Growth and Development: An Important Issue to Maximize Grain Yield. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, 31(1):159-168.
Tharp, B and Kelss, J (2001). Effects of Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) population and Row spacing on light interception, corn yield and common lambsquarters (Chemopodium album) Growth. Weed technology journal: Vol.15:413-418. Cambridge University Press (2001).
URT - The United Republic of Tanzania, 2014. Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security, and Cooperatives: Agriculture Climate Resilience Plan 2014-2019.
Workayehu, T. 2000. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates and Plant Density on Grain yield of Maize. African Crop Science Journal, 8(3):1-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jacob Gidale Kiyyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
