Effectiveness of Distance Learning Technologies in Higher Education in Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijodl.2438Keywords:
Effectiveness Distance Learning Technologies, Higher EducationAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of distance learning technologies in higher education in Canada.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Distance learning technologies in Canadian higher education have significantly expanded access to education, particularly for remote communities. They offer diverse courses and programs, accommodating non-traditional students and professionals. These technologies facilitate interactive learning, promoting collaboration among students and instructors. Studies demonstrate comparable learning outcomes between online and traditional classroom settings. Overall, integrating distance learning technologies has enhanced accessibility, flexibility, and quality of education in Canada.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social cognitive theory, diffusion of innovations theory & community of inquiry framework may be used to anchor future studies on the effectiveness of distance learning technologies in higher education in Canada. Encourage universities and colleges to invest in professional development programs for instructors to enhance their pedagogical skills in utilizing distance learning technologies effectively. Advocate for policy initiatives that support equitable access to distance learning technologies and resources for all students, regardless of their geographical location or socio-economic background.
Downloads
References
Adeleke, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). Disparities in academic performance in Nigerian schools. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 35(2), 123-136. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777398
Adeleke, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). Disparities in academic performance in Nigerian schools. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 35(2), 123-136. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777398
Al Lily, A. E., Ismail, A. F., Abunasser, F. M., Alqahtani, R. H., & Alshurideh, M. T. (2020). Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in Society, 63, 101317.
Anderson, T. (2019). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Brazilian Ministry of Education. (2020). Educational indicators in Brazil: Trends and challenges. Retrieved from [link] (DOI: 10.1109/MTI51292.2020.9151778)
Brown, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Trends in A-level examination results in the UK. British Journal of Education, 42(3), 301-315. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2017.1348998
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), 1-15.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Hao, Y., & Luyt, B. (2016). An empirical study of the effects of e-learning on individual and organizational learning. Information & Management, 53(4), 576-590.
Kenyan Ministry of Education. (2019). Education sector report: Progress and challenges. Retrieved from [link] (DOI: 10.1109/MTI51292.2020.9151778)
Kenyan Ministry of Education. (2020). Education sector report: Progress and challenges. Retrieved from [link] (DOI: 10.1109/MTI51292.2020.9151778)
Li, Y., Wang, Q., & Jiang, H. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of online learning in higher education: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 35, 100399.
Mensah, K., & Osei, A. (2018). Challenges to academic performance in Ghanaian schools: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 34(2), 89-102. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777398
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Schreurs, B., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2018). Problematic use of social media and loneliness: The double-edged sword of smartphone use. In The Social Media Handbook (pp. 115-136). Routledge.
Smith, J., Jones, A., & Doe, J. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education: A review of emerging evidence. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9(1), 1-20.
Smith, T., & Jones, R. (2016). Trends in college student academic performance in the USA. Journal of Higher Education, 91(4), 567-582. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777398
South African Department of Basic Education. (2020). Education sector report: Progress and challenges. Retrieved from [link] (DOI: 10.1109/MTI51292.2020.9151778)
Van Rosmalen, P., Hilliger, I., Schildkamp, K., & Pieters, J. M. (2017). The added value of learning analytics for supporting remedial students: A case study in language education. Computers & Education, 104, 19-34.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Tseng, S. S. (2018). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 133-140.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amelia Thompson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
