Dynamics of Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Communication in the Era of Multiculturalism and Cosmopolitanism in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijs.2325Keywords:
Cultural Diversity, Intercultural Communication, Multiculturalism, CosmopolitanismAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate dynamics of cultural diversity and intercultural communication in the era of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Brazil showcases a vibrant blend of cultural diversity and cosmopolitanism, where various traditions coexist. While cosmopolitanism fosters openness to global perspectives, social and economic inequalities persist, impacting access to opportunities. Ethnic and racial tensions remain, particularly affecting marginalized communities. In summary, Brazil's multicultural landscape presents a dynamic mix of cultural influences, but challenges related to inequality and cultural identity preservation persist.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Cultural pluralism theory, cosmopolitanism theory & contact theory may be used to anchor future studies on dynamics of cultural diversity and intercultural communication in the era of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism. Organizations, educational institutions, and community programs should prioritize intercultural competence training. Advocate for multicultural policies that recognize and celebrate cultural diversity within societies.
Downloads
References
Adewole, D. A., & Mkhize, S. M. (2018). Intercultural Communication in Nigeria: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2006-2023.
Adewole, D. A., & Mkhize, S. M. (2018). Intercultural Communication in Nigeria: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2006-2023.
Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015-1050.
DOI for the Gudykunst and Kim (2017) reference: 10.4324/9781351231637
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communication and Cross-Cultural Adaptation: An Integrative Theory. Routledge.
Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Polity.
Hofstede, G. (2020). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
Jain, M., & Patel, S. (2020). Intercultural Communication Trends in India: Insights from Student Mobility Programs. Journal of Global Mobility, 8(1), 65-80.
Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Routledge.
Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communication and Cross-Cultural Adaptation: An Integrative Theory. Routledge.
Kimani, N., & Mugambi, I. (2016). Enhancing Intercultural Communication in Kenya's Tourism Industry: A Case Study of Cultural Villages in Nairobi County. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism, and Leisure, 5(1), 1-13.
Klyukanov, I. E. (2013). Intercultural communication: A concise introduction. Routledge.
Kymlicka, W. (2010). Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford University Press.
Molefe, K., & Kgatla, S. (2017). Post-Apartheid South Africa: Initiatives and Challenges in Intercultural Communication. African Communication Research, 10(1), 51-68.
Molefe, K., & Kgatla, S. (2017). Post-Apartheid South Africa: Initiatives and Challenges in Intercultural Communication. African Communication Research, 10(1), 51-68.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. Boston Review, 20(6), 3-6.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. The Boston Review, 20(6), 3-6.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174.
Silva, A. B., & Santos, R. M. (2019). The Role of Intercultural Communication in Brazilian Business Organizations: A Study of Current Practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 73, 112-125.
Smith, J., Brown, L., & Johnson, A. (2019). Diversity and Inclusion in the American Workplace: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 48(3), 242-263.
Tadesse, T. B., & Hailemariam, S. (2019). Intercultural Communication and Peacebuilding in Ethiopia: The Role of Government Initiatives. African Communication Research, 12(2), 239-257.
Taylor, L. M., & Smith, P. R. (2016). The Impact of Intercultural Communication on International Trade: Evidence from the UK. International Business Review, 25(2), 421-434.
Yamamoto, S., & Nakamura, M. (2018). Intercultural Communication Training in Japanese Corporations: A Growing Trend. Cross-Cultural Communication, 14(1), 1-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
